I'm late to the party, but "move fast and break things" was *always* explicitly the Space X plan. Like, I guarantee you that they are not terribly surprised that the thing didn't work quite the way they had intended. I mean, I'm sure they're disappointed, but that's why there wasn't anything on the damned thing. I'll skip the politics (which are convoluted and frankly hilarious), and whatever one thinks about Musk (which is a total sideshow), but consider for a second the possibility that they launch stuff so that it *will* fail, if a failure is possible, rather than micro-engineer every last thing to the last scintilla and then have it blow up anyway. And of course, as per usual, everyone is a rocket surgeon when there's rocketry or surgery on the splash screen for Fox or MSNBC. I think the reaction to this "failure" is essentially a failure to understand that failure is an expected, predicted part of the process.