Look, I'm not saying don't write up something that's unsafe, I'm saying don't ground the plane and waste precious time and money for a yoke clip, or sticker. Its give and take in this industry, take take take take take, and you wonder why companies are going out of business all the time. Use your head, be rational, think for yourself.
Seriously, if your company goes under cause you ensure the airplanes are properly maintained....you're screwed anyway...
I've grounded airplanes for broken yoke clips (Anyone flying the E145 knows this to be a fact too) and missing placards. The last thing I need is to 1) hurt myself or someone else, or 2) get ramped and be found with equipment inoperative.
I don't know about you, but shooting an approach without a chart right where I need it is unsafe, and I'm talking about flying in a crew environment. I can't imagine flying single pilot IFR without my charts accessible and properly readable.
There are lots of people who have "prioritized" what's safe for flight. They are engineers, lawyers, rulemakers and certification specialists. There are reasons parts 23 and 25 exist, and equipment standards exist in part 135 and 121. They have created the minimum equipment lists, dmi procedures, and required items for safe flight. They were sitting at their desks when they wrote this. Not at an outstation wanting to get home, so they are taking the most prudent path. The authorization for an MEL is not hard for an operator to obtain. Heck, I've even heard there is a guy that owns a Barron and keeps himself and the airplane certified for CatII ops.
At our operation, we carry a flyaway kit that contains items that will cause the airplane to be stranded at a faroff destination. Sure some single engine cessna has basic equipment and very few complex systems to break. However, if you need it to go fly, you gotta have it.
If someone gets their crap late or arrive late, then so be it. If you "carrying" items is needed for the company to get by, it's time to look for a new place to work.