Nick
Well-Known Member
Also AA doesn't have up or out anymore I believe?
Correct.
Also AA doesn't have up or out anymore I believe?
I get that - but how can this be considered a win? We knew 50 seaters were too many in number and going to be on the way out. So you give management the keys to more large rjs in exchange to park 50 seaters?
I don't see scope choke I see scope fail big time. I'm sure alpa or whatever union likes to take credit for doing something good but I don't buy it. Why allow more large rjs?
Kirby didn't change anything from the MTA/MOU scope.
Because people are afraid of the M88. Its ridiculous really. I was hoping to progress to WB FO then NB CA but after this last bid it looks like I'll be senior enough to bid straight to a line holding, live in base CA position and I may have no reasonable alternative not to bid over.
I never would have imagined upgrades on those fleets getting so quick and really can't figure out why either, especially the 320
Mid-range 777 F/O
$226/hr
18 days off a month
Schedule control
Secluded bunk with 3-5 hour breaks to ease the pain of a whacky schedule
Or with a 13% raise . . .
99% 320 CA
$256/hr
13 days off a month
Working 80% of weekends and almost all holidays, for the next two years minimum
Coverage days
No say in 05:00 reports or 23:45 releases
In NYC, covering three airports
Factoring in an occasional IOE trip buy for the 777 F/O and/or a greenslip or two throughout the year, the captain position could easily be a paycut.
Yes but what is the seniority number of a midrange 777 FO?
That's a good point; they wouldn't be sliding in at the bottom. Still though, the fact remains that different people reach it at different income levels, but there is a point at which more money is simply not worth any hit in QOL and schedule control.
For a single person in their 30s, despite the 'time value of money', there may not be much of a discernable difference between $170K and $220K.
They are both well above what they would need to live comfortably.
For someone in, say, their 50s and a spouse with a good income, the scenario might be just the same.
If the mid-range 777 F/O type can bring in $203,000 on min guarantee, let alone working the system here and there, more money may not do them any good. Particularly as they'll be sliding up through the tax brackets as they lose a few days off each month.
There's several good reasons Delta has 14,000 pilots and 4 month upgrades while AA and UAL aren't remotely close in terms of movement. Not having Scott Kirby types in management is one of them
You bring up a good point with the 777 FO QOL, but even LAX 777 fell under 3 years. Truly unprecedented times. Kit Darby is finally popping a bottle of champagne.
I see what you keep getting at. The senior 777 guys didnt have the same opportunity we have now unfortunately, for them it doesn't make sense to bid these positions, yet. While us junior pukes need to take them if we want to make that much money as we don't have the abilities seniority wise that the senior WB guys have.Yes but what is the seniority number of a midrange 777 FO?
Keep it up and your are gonna get me triggeredScope Choke is forcing the reduction of total regional airframes and block hours while requiring an increase of mainline airframes and block hours thru strategic contractual language.
Less pilots at the regionals is not a big factor yet. Kirby had success at AA increasing regional airframes while reducing mainline airframes. He's trying to do the same at United.
There's several good reasons Delta has 14,000 pilots and 4 month upgrades while AA and UAL aren't remotely close in terms of movement. Not having Scott Kirby types in management is one of them
Meh. I'm a SEA guy and not happy about VA but I'd still rather be here than UAL. Nothing says your widebodies are safe, we are making way more money and our staffing is better where we have close to the same Captains In widebody positions (2 Captains on over 12 hour flights) vs your 1 Captain (I could be wrong). Now we have jr widebody FOs and way junior Captains. I want 141 777s but I wouldn't leave here to go to United to get that.I see where your coming from here and I agree we need to work on the narrowbodies. However I just want to point out Delta has 86 widebodies larger than the 767 on property right now and United has 141. Something to be said for the long term career and not just quick upgrades. On that note we're all envious of the current upgrade opportunities over there and hoping things improve in that regard here. Retirements timing plays a large factor too. As a Seattle guy the JV stuff on your end hits close to home. I'd be pretty upset to lose my LHR trips to another airline if I was SEA based.
Meh. I'm a SEA guy and not happy about VA but I'd still rather be here than UAL. Nothing says your widebodies are safe, we are making way more money and our staffing is better where we have close to the same Captains In widebody positions (2 Captains on over 12 hour flights) vs your 1 Captain (I could be wrong). Now we have jr widebody FOs and way junior Captains. I want 141 777s but I wouldn't leave here to go to United to get that.
To add even with that loss of LHR we just added 60 FOs and 30 CAs to the category that lost that flight...
Yes but i believe it's not just SEA crews flying it could be wrong.Wasnt the loss of SEA-LHR with the addition of PDX-LHR?
I don't think he was suggesting you leave DL for UA.Meh. I'm a SEA guy and not happy about VA but I'd still rather be here than UAL. Nothing says your widebodies are safe, we are making way more money and our staffing is better where we have close to the same Captains In widebody positions (2 Captains on over 12 hour flights) vs your 1 Captain (I could be wrong). Now we have jr widebody FOs and way junior Captains. I want 141 777s but I wouldn't leave here to go to United to get that.
To add even with that loss of LHR we just added 60 FOs and 30 CAs to the category that lost that flight...
Yep not at all. Just that there are other viewpoints out there regarding how the big 3 stack up. I wouldn't leave Delta either if I was you.I don't think he was suggesting you leave DL for UA.
Agreed, I know he wasn't. I was just pointing out everyone always brings up the widebodies, same as fedex's pension. Let's be honest anyone at any of the big 3 will be just fine.I don't think he was suggesting you leave DL for UA.
What I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around is why is Delta so fast on the upgrade? Normally this would indicate a massive amount of new airplanes but that isn't the case. Why are so many FOs holding out?
Really it's that simple. Anyone at any of them is very well off and it will all be ok haha.Agreed, I know he wasn't. I was just pointing out everyone always brings up the widebodies, same as fedex's pension. Let's be honest anyone at any of the big 3 will be just fine.
Our reserve system largely goes fairly senior depending on base and category. Whenever I had reserve in DTW, during a busy month, I was in Detroit for two or three days and might fly. Or. Not. 12 hour call up on long call, two hours (and oh boy, here comes a thread burner if some particular people read this) for short call.
If you live in DTW and are lazy, RSV is the only way to go.
It's not punative.