Re: DAL- let's bring Compass to mainline..website and resolu
Isn't this kind of after the fact? It is my understanding that Compass was formed under an agreement with NWA mgt. and NWA ALPA to have a place to put any pilots displaced by planned DC-9 fleet reductions. Isn't the "no-caveat" Compass-NWA(DAL) flow-up agreement still in place?
I would have rather seen these 175s on mainline's property in the first place, but I don't think that was the original concept in forming Compass and purchasing Mesaba in the first place. Essentially, NWA negotiated a form of "B-scale" with the formation of Compass and Mesaba operating 36-jet fleets of E-175s and CRJ-900s respectively.
I think that if I was a COMAIR pilot I'd not be too happy, and DAL mainline guys weren't willing to allow a change in scope or a flow-up type agreement. So, I guess that was a non-starter for the COMAIR guys allowing DAL guys to flowback. Historically speaking these flow-up/down agreements have been a disaster. Delta mainline (without the benefit of hindsight) really screwed the pooch by establishing scope instead of demanding that COMAIR's original CRJ-100s (1992) be placed on their certificate. BAD move, but no one knew what the state of the industry would be 17 years down the road.
What is to stop managment from selling off Compass to another operator (Mesa, Go-Jets, 'cough' Pinnacle/Colgan or some other bottom-feeder? The union cannot prevent a business decision to sell the company, but I am not familiar enough with clauses in the contract to say how a sale of Compass would effect their ability to keep those 175s off the DAL certificate.