Which one of you guys did this?

fholbert

Mod's - Please don't edit my posts!
Date:28-DEC-2018
Time:11:38 LT
Type:
Silhouette image of generic LJ31 model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different

Learjet 31A
Owner/operator:private
Registration:D-CAMB
MSN:31-155
Fatalities:Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 4
Other fatalities:0
Aircraft damage:None
Category:Serious incident
Location:north of Faro -
CS.gif
Portugal
Phase:En route
Nature:Ferry/positioning
Departure airport:London-Biggin Hill Airport (BQH/EGKB)
Destination airport:Faro Airport (FAO/LPFR)
Investigating agency:BFU Germany
Narrative:
The Learjet 31A corporate jet took off took place at 10:22 LT at London Biggin Hill Airport, United Kingdom. Airport of destination was Faro, Portugal. It was a positioning flight without passengers conducted under instrument flight rules. The Pilot in Command (PIC) occupied the left-hand seat and was pilot flying. The co-pilot occupied the right-hand seat and was pilot monitoring. Two employees of the company were seated in the cabin.
After about one hour of flight time, at 11:30 hrs, the aircraft was in Portuguese airspace. During descent, the PIC asked the co-pilot if he agreed to fly a roll about the longitudinal axis of the aircraft. The co-pilot provided the BFU with a written statement that he did not agree to such a flight manoeuvre and had told the PIC so. According to the co-pilot’s statement and the FDR data, the PIC had disengaged the autopilot at 11:36:50 hrs at about 13,200 ft Pressure Altitude (PA) and flown the airplane manually.
At 11:37:10 hrs, at about 11,500 ft PA, two steep turns with a bank angle of about 140° each were flown left and right. At 11:38:15 hrs, the PIC conducted the roll about the longitudinal axis of the airplane, also at about 11,500 ft PA levelling-off occurred 10 s later.
The flight manoeuvre was initiated with 301 kt IAS. During the roll, airspeed decreased continuously. Levelling-off occurred with 251 kt IAS. During the initiation of the flight manoeuvre a maximum load factor of +2.47 g occurred, which decreased continuously to +1.00 g.
During the flight no one was injured. At 11:49 hrs, landing occurred at Faro Airport, Portugal.


In May 2019, the operator charged another company with the routine read-out of the FDR data as part of the Flight Data Monitoring (FDM). After the read-out, the flight manoeuvre was identified due to the exceptionally high roll angle data. On 4 June 2019, the operator reported the occurrence with the BFU.

20181228_LJ31_D-CAMB_7683.jpg
 
The flight manoeuvre was initiated with 301 kt IAS. During the roll, airspeed decreased continuously. Levelling-off occurred with 251 kt IAS. During the initiation of the flight manoeuvre a maximum load factor of +2.47 g occurred, which decreased continuously to +1.00 g.

Living dangerously too, considering design limit load for Transport Category aircraft is +2.50 G (14 CFR 25.337). The owners should inspect the structure and send the results to Bombardier as a static limit proof load test. :)

That being said, I wonder if the +2.47 G was on the initial pull to pitch 20° nose up, because the rest of the roll and vertical accelerations shown in the snapshots actually looked pretty decently executed. :p
 
Last edited:
Back
Top