Great Lakes to rise from the ashes?

FloridaLarry

Well-Known Member
Great Lakes has executed a 5th Amendment - 3rd Forbearance agreement with its lenders on September 23rd. As expected, GLA remains in breach of three financial covenants in the original funding agreement from 2011.

This forbearance lasts until December 1, 2014 or until GLA commits additional breaches (pretty standard language). Their interest rate jumps another 2% per year, and they'll pay additional fees and expenses.

The big new news is the GLA has agreed to enter into a new funding agreement with a 3rd party (unspecified), NLT October 31st, to pay all monies due by December 1st of this year.

Them's the facts, from GLA's filings at the SEC, available at www.sec.gov. Search the EDGAR data base for filings by Great Lakes Aviation.

Speculation: They have a deal pending, or they wouldn't do this with such short time-lines. The contrarian analysis says they're just buying a little more time, and hope for a Hail-Mary 6th Amendment. This would seem unlikely, unless the lenders see light at the end of the tunnel. The lenders have been patient, all the while milking GLA for additional monies & fees.

These filings say nothing about the shape of a re-born GLA, old vs new executives, old vs new business plan, or the weather in Cheyenne WY.
 
I think it would be safe to say that the company providing the infusion of money has done their due dilligence. I don't think they will provide capital based on what GLA management may tell them. I'm sure there may be additional ESA routes GLA may be getting or something of the sorts that would entice a company to lend out money.
 
I think it would be safe to say that the company providing the infusion of money has done their due dilligence. I don't think they will provide capital based on what GLA management may tell them. I'm sure there may be additional ESA routes GLA may be getting or something of the sorts that would entice a company to lend out money.

That surprising considering the pay rates of their pilots and the traction that topic has finally recieved by the media over the past 6 months or so.
 
SilkyD said:
I think it would be safe to say that the company providing the infusion of money has done their due dilligence. I don't think they will provide capital based on what GLA management may tell them. I'm sure there may be additional ESA routes GLA may be getting or something of the sorts that would entice a company to lend out money.

At the lenders' insistence, GLA has hired Huron Consulting (an international company with HQ in Chicago) to advise the airline and its lenders. Among other business areas, Huron is a turnaround specialist. While they claim no specialized practice in airlines, this may well be a plus. GLA operates, in part, like few other airlines. Conventional thinking won't keep them flying - it has led them to where they are today. More of the same isn't likely to be much of a solution! Consultants' jobs includes helping companies think outside their traditional box.

The clock is ticking.
 
Their operating certificate could be the value here. A start up airline might be interested in such a certificate. It's been done before. One that comes to mind is the value jet/air tran merger.

Joe
 
The ValueJet/Air Tran merger had to do with acquiring the name after ValueJet left both Candi Kubek and their reputation in a smoking crater in the Everglades, along with another 109 people.
 
The ValueJet/Air Tran merger had to do with acquiring the name after ValueJet left both Candi Kubek and their reputation in a smoking crater in the Everglades, along with another 109 people.
The full name is now "AirTran, the airline formerly known as ValuJet, now a part of Southwest Airlines," just to annoy @ATN_Pilot .

SilkyD said:


At the lenders' insistence, GLA has hired Huron Consulting (an international company with HQ in Chicago) to advise the airline and its lenders. Among other business areas, Huron is a turnaround specialist. While they claim no specialized practice in airlines, this may well be a plus. GLA operates, in part, like few other airlines. Conventional thinking won't keep them flying - it has led them to where they are today. More of the same isn't likely to be much of a solution! Consultants' jobs includes helping companies think outside their traditional box.

The clock is ticking.
"SEEEEEEEEEYUHHHHHHHHHH"
 
Rumor on "the other site" is that GLA gave FOs a raise from $16 to $22/hr. Not much, but it starts to make it survivable. Haven't heard anything about a Captain raise, but if assume so, since 22 was their captain pay before.
 
It sounds like they are essentially paying one credit card bill using another credit card. Lenders get wet in the shorts when this situation occurs.
 
Rumor on "the other site" is that GLA gave FOs a raise from $16 to $22/hr. Not much, but it starts to make it survivable. Haven't heard anything about a Captain raise, but if assume so, since 22 was their captain pay before.

Everything still shows FOs start at $16 and the CAs are still under $30. Serious question though. Who is actually putting up the cash behind this place to keep it going? Who is the (unspecified) 3rd party. Foreign investors? It all seems a bit on the sketchy side to me.
 
nuclear-cockroach.jpg
 
Back
Top