USCG pilot in fatal mishap facing court martial

MikeD

Administrator
Staff member
This one is odd. Not a lot of background detail as of yet, but facing an Article 32....essentially a military grand jury hearing........so far, as a result of a July 2010 accident off of Washington state. It's rare that a military accident generates UCMJ charges; the last one I remember off the top of my head being the USMC EA-6B Prowler front-end crew who were involved in the cable car collision in Italy in 1998, resulting in the death of 20 civilians.

JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — More than a year had passed since the U.S. Coast Guard helicopter crash off Washington state killed three of Lt. Lance Leone's colleagues.

The sole survivor and co-pilot, Leone had recovered from his injuries and been cleared, his father said, for flight re-training.

But that never happened. Instead, Leone was charged with negligent homicide and other violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice in connection with the July 2010 accident.

The decision stunned Leone's family and friends as well as the parents of one of the victims, Brett Banks. "We're very upset about it," Banks' mother, Sandra, said by telephone from her home in Green River, Wyo. "We don't think it should be happening. Another family's being destroyed and it's breaking our hearts."

The charges against Leone, which the Coast Guard hasn't publicly specified in detail, will be heard beginning Wednesday in Juneau. Both sides will be allowed to make arguments during the Article 32 hearing with an investigating officer making eventual recommendations to the Coast Guard's commanding officer in Alaska, Rear Admiral Thomas Ostebo, for the next course of action.

Possibilities include dismissal of the charges, administrative action or court martial, Coast Guard spokesman Kip Wadlow said. Leone faces a possible maximum penalty that includes 7 ½ years in prison if convicted on all courts at a court martial.

The 31-year-old Leone, who has earned a long list of Coast Guard awards and accolades, including commendation medals, was the co-pilot of the MH-60 Jayhawk helicopter flying from Astoria, Ore., to the crew's base in Sitka, Alaska, when it crashed off LaPush, Wash., last year. Witnesses told media outlets the helicopter was flying low and hit power cables strung 1,900 feet from LaPush to James Island. Leone was pulled from the water by Good Samaritans.

Lance Leone, who is currently serving in an administrative position, wasn't available for comment. But his father, George, said his son wasn't at the controls and did everything he was supposed to be doing as navigator that day. George Leone claimed the helicopter hit unmarked wires, which had orange warning balls near the poles instead of dotting the span.

"And the sole survivor, they're trying to blame him," said George Leone, who is from Palm Bay, Fla., but has been at his son's home in Sitka lately. "It's just unbelievable."

The lines were maintained by the Coast Guard, and it wasn't the first accident involving them, according to court records: There was a fatal accident in 1961 and another collision in the late-1950s, according to a 1965 federal appeals decision. That decision, in the 1961 case, found the Coast Guard failed to exercise "reasonable care" by not having warning devices installed but said the probability of resulting harm wasn't great enough to find this constituted "wanton misconduct."

Wadlow said he couldn't answer questions about whether or how the lines were marked at the time of the 2010 crash, citing the investigation. He said that issue will be discussed at the hearing.

Leone faces charges of negligent homicide, dereliction of duty and destruction of government property. The charge sheet alleges Leone failed to properly navigate the helicopter to avoid charted hazards and that he negligently failed to ensure it was flying at a higher altitude. It also alleges that he did "without proper authority, through neglect, destroy by causing the crash of CG-6017," an aircraft valued at $18.3 million.

The negligent homicide charges are related to the deaths of Banks, 33, of Rock Springs, Wyo., and Adam C. Hoke, 40, of Great Falls, Mont. There is no charge related to the third victim, the pilot, Lt. Sean Krueger, 33, of Seymour, Conn.
Leone's civilian attorney, John Smith, who is part of his defense team, said the government hasn't explained why that is. Wadlow said the charges were based upon the evidence collected. Ostebo said he couldn't discuss the circumstances surrounding the case.

Sandra Banks said she was told by someone with the Coast Guard in early October that it was a two-pilot helicopter so both Leone and Krueger were considered pilots. She couldn't recall who that person was but said she told him she considered the accident a circumstance of improperly marked lines. He told her there was new evidence.

Story here:

http://news.yahoo.com/cg-crash-survivor-faces-charges-deadly-incident-163127666.html
 
Ouch...were the lines marked? I'm just thinking that even if he was up front, he should have been looking out. Granted there are times we all look down at our charts, take a sip of water, or something else. Buuuuut definitely shouldn't be homicide or muder or w/e it is.

Hope all goes well though!
 
It will be interesting to see how this one finishes out.

A few years ago, there was a Chinook crew that was killed and then found negiligent in thier actions. Despite this ruling by the accident investigation board, the families were successful in thier lawsuit against the utility company that owned the power lines. Eventhough the lines were properly marked and were shown on the hazards map being used. The helicopter actually hit one of the orange balls!

They were low level waving at some women on jet skis......................

This might be one of those moves. Get the blame moved out of the lap of the owner of the cables (Coast Guard).

Who knows?

That having been stated: IF they were screwing around; If you can't do the time........
 
Ouch...were the lines marked?

From the article, that is unclear.

I'm just thinking that even if he was up front, he should have been looking out. Granted there are times we all look down at our charts, take a sip of water, or something else. Buuuuut definitely shouldn't be homicide or muder or w/e it is.

Hope all goes well though!

It depends. It doesn't matter that he was up front, it matters what he was doing at the time duty-wise. If he was on the controls as PF, he may not have seen the wires, depending on a number of factors and circumstances such as time of day, visibility, etc; even with the best lookout. If he was PNF, he would be navigating, both visually as well as electronically; watching the route and for hazards, and too there are a number of factors that would go into whether they were seen or not. Am curious to see the more in-depth information as it comes out.
 
Weird, but who knows what went on. Maybe chalk it up to younger crew members in the back, and upset families that want to hold the A/C CDR and flight deck crew responsible. Do I agree with legal proceedings? No, but it is a lot of responsibility those guys shoulder. Might sound a little cliche, but those young hard charging airmen in the back are precious cargo for all of us, especially their families back home. I can see how someone may be pissed if the SIR found that there was some sort of buffoonery going on up front when they crashed. Not saying there was, just IF there was....
 
Weird, but who knows what went on. Maybe chalk it up to younger crew members in the back, and upset families that want to hold the A/C CDR and flight deck crew responsible. Do I agree with legal proceedings? No, but it is a lot of responsibility those guys shoulder. Might sound a little cliche, but those young hard charging airmen in the back are precious cargo for all of us, especially their families back home.

I'm very curious where this crosses the line from accident, and becomes a crime. And why a crime only as it relates to the back-end flightcrew and not the pilot? Remember, he was the co-pilot, NOT the AC, as the AC perished. Still, he was upfront so I get your point there. It's just interesting that something like this would be taken this route, as this is very uncommon to have homicide UCMJ charges.
 
I'm very curious where this crosses the line from accident, and becomes a crime. And why a crime only as it relates to the back-end flightcrew and not the pilot? Remember, he was the co-pilot, NOT the AC, as the AC perished. Still, he was upfront so I get your point there. It's just interesting that something like this would be taken this route, as this is very uncommon to have homicide UCMJ charges.

I'm only guessing with the rest of you here but:
From the military's standpoint, the people in the back are the responsibility of the crew with access to the controls whether AC, PF or PNF. Making the pilot responsibile for thier deaths makes sense to me (criminal? I don't know...Homicide, it's a stretch). They are going to have to show criminal intent for homicide, right? Of course if they were screwing around, the intent could be thier disregard for safety.

Also, I can see why the other pilot wasn't listed; because he would be just as responsible for the crash. They both hold the ball on this one.

Perhaps he would be charged too if he were alive. Here again this is IF they were screwing around.
 
We also don't know if this pilot had anything in his system, if he was fully qualified to by flying, etc. If a pilot survives a mishap, they have a full flight physical with a full test of blood, urine, etc. Not enough details as of yet I think to understand why this is happening. Granted it could be just as the EA-6B Prowler mishap in Italy though I believe they got off thanks to one fantastic flight physiologist. They may have gotten busted for destroying some evidence after the flight though.
 
We also don't know if this pilot had anything in his system, if he was fully qualified to by flying, etc. If a pilot survives a mishap, they have a full flight physical with a full test of blood, urine, etc. Not enough details as of yet I think to understand why this is happening.

Hence my curiousity for more info. As you and Dustoff mention, there are factors which could potenitally lead to this direction, but so far, the details of such haven't been released one way or another.

Granted it could be just as the EA-6B Prowler mishap in Italy though I believe they got off thanks to one fantastic flight physiologist. They may have gotten busted for destroying some evidence after the flight though.

They were charged for the negligent homicide initially, and that did indeed get acquitted. The destruction of evidence charge came later for destroying the flight recording device tape, IIRC. And also, I don't believe the backseat ECMOs were charged with anything, which I can understand.

Speaking of EA-6B accidents and having medicines or other drugs in the system, the EA-6B night landing accident on the USS Nimitz in 1981 comes to mind which killed 14, where the pilot was determined to have been taking over the counter cold medicine, thought to have been a factor due to the antihistimines.
 
The physiologist, if that's the right term for him, who testified on the crew's behalf is down at NAS Pensacola. It's a big ticket mishap that is always analyzed.
 
As bunk said, it's impossible to draw a reasoned opinion without his bloodwork and even moreso his statements to investigators. My initial reaction is that it's political BS, but if the family of one of the guys in back is upset by the charges, one wonders where the pressure is coming from, if not from the aforementioned statements and toxicology. Certainly worth watching.
 
Welcome to the NEW and IMPROVED US military. This is a very clear example as to why I... not got out... ran the eff away... from the military. When guys were being tried for actions performed in combat, overseas, while engaged in a firefight, I knew my time was up. The military no longer has great leaders looking to do what is in the best interest of their people, it is chock full of boxhead corporate types incapable of making command decisions, taking care of their people, and doing what is in the best interest of the team. The General/Admiral types only care about their next gig as a lobbyist, or high level executive in the military industrial complex. The mid level E's have no real authority aside from a threat of UCMJ for perceived infractions that may affect their careers.

This is a sham. Some Admiral is looking out for his career...
 
Welcome to the NEW and IMPROVED US military. This is a very clear example as to why I... not got out... ran the eff away... from the military. When guys were being tried for actions performed in combat, overseas, while engaged in a firefight, I knew my time was up. The military no longer has great leaders looking to do what is in the best interest of their people, it is chock full of boxhead corporate types incapable of making command decisions, taking care of their people, and doing what is in the best interest of the team. The General/Admiral types only care about their next gig as a lobbyist, or high level executive in the military industrial complex. The mid level E's have no real authority aside from a threat of UCMJ for perceived infractions that may affect their careers.

This is a sham. Some Admiral is looking out for his career...


O.K. now. . Com'n. . This is JC. . You don't have to pull your punches here or worry about being so diplomatic.

What do you really think?
 
Welcome to the NEW and IMPROVED US military. This is a very clear example as to why I... not got out... ran the eff away... from the military. When guys were being tried for actions performed in combat, overseas, while engaged in a firefight, I knew my time was up. The military no longer has great leaders looking to do what is in the best interest of their people, it is chock full of boxhead corporate types incapable of making command decisions, taking care of their people, and doing what is in the best interest of the team. The General/Admiral types only care about their next gig as a lobbyist, or high level executive in the military industrial complex. The mid level E's have no real authority aside from a threat of UCMJ for perceived infractions that may affect their careers.

This is a sham. Some Admiral is looking out for his career...

This isn't new, it cyclic. Read Robin Olds book and see what he was saying the 60's, same sort of thing. I know folks always say we are at war but we really are not AT WAR. It's a contained conflict and the majority of the military operates as a peace time military and we know what happens in a peace time military.
 
I have no idea what happened that day inside the cockpit, but a few verifiable facts are indisputable. The wires from the mainland to James Island are clearly depicted on the Seattle sectional and the helicopter hit the wires at an altitude of about 250 feet. The entire area is also within a designated wildlife refuge.

The crew had information easily available to them about the wire-hazard but failed to negotiate the obstacle. Why? Was there an emergency they were dealing with at the time? Did they get distracted and/or complacent? Or was it as simple as failing to conduct preflight planning? If so, does the CG require the crew to be briefed and approved prior to missions via a checklist which ensures the crew conducted adequate pre-flight planning? If so, was that briefing and approval process conducted to standard and if not, what charges will the briefer and approver face?

On the subject of charges, and this is a complete what-if because we don't know the facts, but if this accident was simply caused by inadequate pre-flight planning, what should the military do about it? If they killed three people and destroyed an 18 million dollar helicopter because they simply did not pull out a sectional what is an appropriate response?
 
This isn't new, it cyclic. Read Robin Olds book and see what he was saying the 60's, same sort of thing. I know folks always say we are at war but we really are not AT WAR. It's a contained conflict and the majority of the military operates as a peace time military and we know what happens in a peace time military.

Yes. Yes we do. ;)
 
I have no idea what happened that day inside the cockpit, but a few verifiable facts are indisputable. The wires from the mainland to James Island are clearly depicted on the Seattle sectional and the helicopter hit the wires at an altitude of about 250 feet. The entire area is also within a designated wildlife refuge.

The crew had information easily available to them about the wire-hazard but failed to negotiate the obstacle. Why? Was there an emergency they were dealing with at the time? Did they get distracted and/or complacent? Or was it as simple as failing to conduct preflight planning? If so, does the CG require the crew to be briefed and approved prior to missions via a checklist which ensures the crew conducted adequate pre-flight planning? If so, was that briefing and approval process conducted to standard and if not, what charges will the briefer and approver face?

On the subject of charges, and this is a complete what-if because we don't know the facts, but if this accident was simply caused by inadequate pre-flight planning, what should the military do about it? If they killed three people and destroyed an 18 million dollar helicopter because they simply did not pull out a sectional what is an appropriate response?

I'd start with keep it in-house, and deal with it accordingly. Note: I'm not suggesting sweeping it. I'm advocating dealing with it as a private command/USCG issue. There is NOTHING that will be revealed about this case in the long term. They're either going to 1. Find him guilty, and give him a DD, or a Big Chicken Dinner, and/or jail sentence. We won't know. Or 2. If he's plugged into the right circles, he'll get a Letter of Reprimand, and it'll get swept. Either way, we'll never know the outcome.

Watch.
 
Back
Top