The Attack on the 2nd Amendment Continues

As a VA "patient", I have found the entire system so tied up in bureaucracy that I have chosen to just not even use it.

I have been waiting/working a year just to get someone to look at the fact that I am unable to create an online application for benefits. The e-Benefits website flags the problem, tells me to call a 1-800 number for service. I have waited hour upon hour on the phone, left messages that have never been returned, finally got fed up and drove to visit more than one VA benefits and medical center and was told they couldn't help me, etc, and I can't find a single person who can actually help me. This is just to take step 1 in the process. A year, and I am no closer today than I was in May 2015 when I initially attempted to file for VA medical benefits.

Thank God I'm not actually in need of substantial medical attention; if I were, I'd probably be dead by now.

Government-run health care.

Those of you who think it is the answer to our nation's health care crisis have obviously never had to use it.
The entire system from the ground up would have to be studied/re-structured and changed/improved. I haven't even seen the start of that. The system at this point, might be too broken and too far gone to help anyone. Perhaps a private system needs to be at least considered/looked at. If the VA is an example of what a government run medical insurance plan would be like, good luck with that.
 
Last edited:
Government-run health care.

Those of you who think it is the answer to our nation's health care crisis have obviously never had to use it.

Government run healthcare CAN work! In fact, it does, in many countries. I've used the British NHS on numerous occasions and found it to be generally OK. Not great, certainly not perfect, but mostly alright.

I've seen the trainwreck that government run healthcare is in the US. Both the VA and IHS systems as examples are a total disaster. I don't believe the US government is capable of implementing any kind of socialized medicine system with it's current motivations. Just look at Obamacare, the complete opposite of a socialized system, designed by Republicans, implemented by Democrats and hated by everyone.
 
So, what's the science on transgenderism?

Gender dysphoria has been in the DSM for decades.

What's interesting is, given how much social attention has been paid to it of recent years, how prominent folks in the west think it is vs the rates of actual occurrence. It is still extremely rare, and is not normative by any stretch of the imagination.
 
Government run healthcare CAN work! In fact, it does, in many countries. I've used the British NHS on numerous occasions and found it to be generally OK. Not great, certainly not perfect, but mostly alright.

I found the NHS a complete trainwreck, to put it lightly.

My family had two major interactions (a broken leg and an internal injury/ruptured spleen, and a baby born via placenta previa which resulted in substandard blood oxygenation levels), and they were both marquee-level problems in terms of access to care, quality of care, and comfort of care.

Both issues were "saved" in that my family had the ability to fall back on care in a US military hospital there in the UK.

Outside of the fact that the NHS is "free", I cannot think of a single redeeming quality about it when compared to care in the United States.
 
Trump says he wants to make the American healthcare system identical to the Scottish system, which is identical to thr NHS but better funded.
 
As a VA "patient", I have found the entire system so tied up in bureaucracy that I have chosen to just not even use it.

I have been waiting/working a year just to get someone to look at the fact that I am unable to create an online application for benefits. The e-Benefits website flags the problem, tells me to call a 1-800 number for service. I have waited hour upon hour on the phone, left messages that have never been returned, finally got fed up and drove to visit more than one VA benefits and medical center and was told they couldn't help me, etc, and I can't find a single person who can actually help me. This is just to take step 1 in the process. A year, and I am no closer today than I was in May 2015 when I initially attempted to file for VA medical benefits.

Thank God I'm not actually in need of substantial medical attention; if I were, I'd probably be dead by now.

Government-run health care.

Those of you who think it is the answer to our nation's health care crisis have obviously never had to use it.

The entire system from the ground up would have to be studied/re-structured and changed/improved. I haven't even seen the start of that. The system at this point, might be too broken and too far gone to help anyone. Perhaps a private system needs to be at least considered/looked at. If the VA is an example of what a government run medical insurance plan would be like, good luck with that.

I found the NHS a complete trainwreck, to put it lightly.

My family had two major interactions (a broken leg and an internal injury/ruptured spleen, and a baby born via placenta previa which resulted in substandard blood oxygenation levels), and they were both marquee-level problems in terms of access to care, quality of care, and comfort of care.

Both issues were "saved" in that my family had the ability to fall back on care in a US military hospital there in the UK.

Outside of the fact that the NHS is "free", I cannot think of a single redeeming quality about it when compared to care in the United States.

Hold on here.

Our health care system, before Obamacare was horrific. Thank GOD preexisting conditions or lifetime caps are no longer part of the vocabulary of health insurance laws or policies. Also, I am happy folks are having their lives saved thanks to Obamacare.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/...or-serving-me-even-when-I-didn-t-vote-for-you
 
March 2, 2016
Even NPR agrees that Obamacare has failed
By William Tate

"A thorough repudiation of the (un-)Affordable Care Act comes from, of all places, state-run National Public Radio. Timed to be buried by Super Tuesday coverage, NPR this week released a new study that indicates that Obamacare has failed on almost all levels.

The poll, by NPR, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, shows that three quarters of Americans think health care in their state has not improved under Obamacare. The survey says more people think health care has gotten worse (26%) than better (15%). Forty-nine percent of people think health care has stayed about the same.

And I hope you haven’t been making plans of what to do with that $2,500 a year you’ll be saving on premiums. The NPR poll confirms that that was just another in Obama’s litany of lies. Forty-five percent of respondents said their premiums had gone up, while 46% said their premiums had stayed about the same. Only 4% said their premiums had actually gone down, as Obama promised they would.

Along with higher premiums, co-pays and deductibles have gone up for 35% of people. Fifty-six percent say they’ve stayed about the same. Again, only 4% of those surveyed said their copays and deductibles have actually gone down.

Meanwhile, the increased benefits Obama swore we’d get apparently haven’t materialized. Seventy percent of people said their benefits have stayed about the same. Twelve percent said their benefits have actually decreased. Only 16% of people polled said they have better benefits now than before Obamacare.

NPR tried to put a predictable pro-Obama/Hillary spin on the study, with the lede on one story reading:

A series of polls in key states by NPR and its partners finds that more than half of adults in the U.S. believe the Affordable Care Act has either helped the people of their state or has had no effect. Those sentiments are common despite all the political wrangling that continues over the law.

To put Obamacare in a less unsavory light, NPR led that story by combining the figures for those who said the ACA “has had no effect” with those who said “better,” which, of course, defies logic. When Democrats committed the federal government to spending trillions of dollars on Obamacare, it presumably wasn’t to keep things the same.

Although with the way this crowd in Washington – Democrats and Republicans – likes to spend our tax dollars, who knows?"
 
March 2, 2016
Even NPR agrees that Obamacare has failed
By William Tate

"A thorough repudiation of the (un-)Affordable Care Act comes from, of all places, state-run National Public Radio. Timed to be buried by Super Tuesday coverage, NPR this week released a new study that indicates that Obamacare has failed on almost all levels.

The poll, by NPR, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, shows that three quarters of Americans think health care in their state has not improved under Obamacare. The survey says more people think health care has gotten worse (26%) than better (15%). Forty-nine percent of people think health care has stayed about the same.

And I hope you haven’t been making plans of what to do with that $2,500 a year you’ll be saving on premiums. The NPR poll confirms that that was just another in Obama’s litany of lies. Forty-five percent of respondents said their premiums had gone up, while 46% said their premiums had stayed about the same. Only 4% said their premiums had actually gone down, as Obama promised they would.

Along with higher premiums, co-pays and deductibles have gone up for 35% of people. Fifty-six percent say they’ve stayed about the same. Again, only 4% of those surveyed said their copays and deductibles have actually gone down.

Meanwhile, the increased benefits Obama swore we’d get apparently haven’t materialized. Seventy percent of people said their benefits have stayed about the same. Twelve percent said their benefits have actually decreased. Only 16% of people polled said they have better benefits now than before Obamacare.

NPR tried to put a predictable pro-Obama/Hillary spin on the study, with the lede on one story reading:

A series of polls in key states by NPR and its partners finds that more than half of adults in the U.S. believe the Affordable Care Act has either helped the people of their state or has had no effect. Those sentiments are common despite all the political wrangling that continues over the law.

To put Obamacare in a less unsavory light, NPR led that story by combining the figures for those who said the ACA “has had no effect” with those who said “better,” which, of course, defies logic. When Democrats committed the federal government to spending trillions of dollars on Obamacare, it presumably wasn’t to keep things the same.

Although with the way this crowd in Washington – Democrats and Republicans – likes to spend our tax dollars, who knows?"

It could be better, sure! However, it is better than what we have had. Once again, lifetime caps and preexisting conditions are HUGE.
 
Who gives a damn where people poo? Why is this even remotely an issue? I am not even entirely sure why the hell we have "gendered" bathrooms at all from a strictly philosophical standpoint on egalitarianism. You know what I do when I go to the bathroom? I take a dump or a pee, I also try to avoid making eye-contact with anyone else in the damn place as does everyone else. This is a non-issue - for those of you who think this is a big deal... how the hell are they going to know? What, am I supposed to do, whip it out at the entrance to the mens' room? "Here you go inspector, I have a dong and identify as a male." Are they going to check my wife for a dick every time she goes to pee?

No, this sort of legislation is only in place to make trans folks feel unwelcome in society. It's not like these people "choose" to be trans - can you imagine how freaking terrible it would be to feel like a man but be a woman or vice versa? No one would voluntarily choose to make their life difficult that way.
 
It could be better, sure! However, it is better than what we have had. Once again, lifetime caps and preexisting conditions are HUGE.

Those are the major positives of Obamacare, and they are indeed huge positives. The cost is that the government now forces control of peoples healthcare to a few highly profitable companies, and forces people to pay them at the point of a gun. Far from 'socialist' healthcare, this is 'facist' healthcare. It's almost like a Republican designed it.
 
Back
Top