I'm not sure which would be considered a worse admission: "We were so distracted by our non-essential talking that we ignored ATC, ACARS, TOD, the nav screen, and virtually every aspect of the flight plan for an hour,"
or
"We unintentionally both fell asleep at the same time."
On one hand, the latter is clearly worse. Two pilots arguing would most likely notice serious deterioration in attitude or altitude more quickly than two sleeping pilots. On the other hand, in the first case, you're basically admitting that a conversation was enough to make you ignore virtually all of your training and cluelessly fly right past your destination. To me, in some ways the "falling asleep" explanation is more understandable, and even forgivable, than the "heated argument" explanation. Sleeping is a biological imperative. Getting in heated arguments is not.
My thoughts exactly. What a stupid cover story! In the absence of proof they were sleeping, their cover story subjects them to discipline and termination.
If they're able to prove the pilots were asleep, then they're subject to discipline for sleeping AND lying, and could face criminal charges for the lying.
Had they come clean about sleeping and demanded action to reduce fatigue, they could've gotten off MUCH easier. Stupid, stupid, stupid. Always tell the truth and take your lumps!
Well, it really depends on the facts of the case above and beyond what the media's saying.
The ongoing joke is "I didn't know if it was the white pages, the orange pages, or the green pages, merger's goin' great..."
So if they asked someone that wasn't directly involved with the incident, probably cracking a joke, he'd have probably said "They were probably too busy arguing about policy changes" (yuk yuk).
Nope, no crew mixing yet.
Nope, no crew mixing yet.
Sorry, but there's this Louisana judge that doesn't believe in crew mixing. He says it ruins companies.
Pilots get in heated discussions ALL the time. I'm almost CERTAIN this isn't what happened on this flight.
I also think that it's quite possible the FA's woke them up. Let me ask you this: If they slept through ATC's frequency change and repeated attempts to reestablish communication, the radio volume was probably down. So why would they mysteriously wake up to the other NWA plane calling them?
....
Kind of like all of the "make sure you use the right runway" comments shortly after the LEX thing?Passengers were asking me why were our flight delayed today. Was it because our pilots overshot the airport?
Got annoying after awhile.
In my work its very easy to snooze off when its smooth. Anybody ever heard the mention of crew alerters like they have installed in train locos that sound every few minutes or seconds?
I wouldn't be surprised if this incident doesn't trigger some sort of FAA mandate to have FAs check on the flight deck every 20 min or so; or, install some sort of beeper on the flight deck that would ring every few minutes requiring the pilots to physically reset it. We aren't doing ourselves any favors by continuing to do stupid things that just provides fodder to our beloved 24 hour "starved for news" media.
WOW! As a former (and hopefully, future) Flight Attendant, didn't THEY notice anything was amiss? :dunno: