I know everyone thinks I'm being a jerk, but it's Good that they are finally washing more people out and making the screening process harder. There are literally hundreds of trainees that have failed out at the facilities and now the FAA is trying to place them in other Easier places. Hopefully this cuts Down on the facility washouts.
I think you are speaking the truth man... OKC needs to get back to washing people out left and right that can't do this job instead of sending them to facilities to determine their fate. There is no reason why the FAA Academy shouldn't be harder. Probably only 30-40% of the people I went through with will certify at their first facility, while we had a 90% pass rate. One guy in the class, failed a PV twice, the facility still wanted him and he ended up washing out on ground at RDU. It goes to show you, that the FAA Academy should be allowed to weed more individuals out before they get to their facilities.
The OTS hires are a MILLION TIMES BETTER THAN CTIs and prior military controllers on the whole. There is no cockiness with OTS hires because they don't have the mentality of "I was an AF controller for four years and worked a 130 op hour..." or "I graduated from Embry Riddle and know all the basics and everything about ATC so I don't need to study, just let me work it and you just sit there because I need to get checked out to pay back my $100,000+ I owe..."
For Swinte...
1) Was the guy who crossed downfield at Echo clear of the runway? He doesn't have to hold short of the hold short lines after he crosses a runway. He is required to do what it takes to clear the runway. So if he was clear of the runway, why wasn't the B737 cleared for take off?
2) Why wasn't the A310 side stepped to 28L and cleared to land, while you dealt with the situation of the B737 holding in position and the aircraft crossing downfield? Or why wasn't the A310 circled to another runway (16/34) and cleared to land?
3) If the A310 was broken off the approach before the runway, why didn't you clear the B737 for takeoff? What wake turbulence is there if the A310 never came close to the runway? You can provide visual on the guys, plus you have diverging course that will not cross...
4) Did the SOP at the FAA Academy say something like... "All go around aircraft shall be issued runway heading?" If it did, then I can see why you got an operation deviation on your second PV.
5) Why didn't you adjust the flight path of the Cessna before you got to the position of needing a 360 degree turn? 360s are very sloppy and crappy ATCing that should only be used if there are no other options...