AirTran/SWA Seniority Integration Deal

You're right, seniority is very important. But if you were to be on reserve for another 10 years at Southwest you're still going to gross $160,000 on reserve in your 10th year while getting 15-16 days off sitting in the right seat. That's what lineholders make on the 75/76 at most legacy's as a CAPTAIN.

To add to your comment on it being a business transaction, I completely agree. And in that sense, I strongly feel based on WN's prior actions, they will show no mercy in transfering all flying plane by plane to WN from FL if things get nasty.......IF. When I read this in the agreement the ALPA made with WN I could not believe they agreed to that. Does anyone else see the significance of this in the event it goes down the wrong path?

People keep saying this, but I haven't seen any legal avenue for doing so. If AirTran's scope clause is as iron clad as Todd claims it is, and I don't doubt him in that regard, I'd really like to know HOW this is possible. If it's impossible, it's not a threat, it's simply a bad rumor that's flying around.

All I want to know is how, and nobody has been able to confront that issue. Without a discussion on the actual maneuvering that would occur, it sounds like little more than FUD to me ya know?

EDIT: Now if Southwest were to exit from the transaction, dumping the planes, routes and pilots with it, that'd be one thing. But purchasing the company, keeping the planes and routes and ditching the pilots? This is the whole reason that you have scope and sucessorship language.
 
removing first class seats out of ATL helps us out.

I know people that pay for first class tickets when they can, but would rather fly Southwest if they are available.

When your customers get an all around better experience they will stay loyal. I believe a large part of Southwest's success is the overall happy group of employees. Happy employees = happy customers. People at the legacies have been screwed over so much that the overall culture has seemed to change for the worse. That bad culture change will inevitably hurt customer service.
 
Obviously since Southwest has bought them already. Merging the certificates is where the fun begins. My ignorant question is this.

When the certificates merge, are the pilot groups still able to be under separate contracts? If it is possible, what will happen to that ATN Holding Company scope keeping the pilots from getting dropped?
 
Obviously since Southwest has bought them already. Merging the certificates is where the fun begins. My ignorant question is this.

When the certificates merge, are the pilot groups still able to be under separate contracts? If it is possible, what will happen to that ATN Holding Company scope keeping the pilots from getting dropped?
Different or same certificates has nothing to do with it, and the language is binding on Air Tran or it's successors. The point at which ATN's contract with their pilot group is no longer enforced is at the point the Joint Collective Bargaining Agreement between Southwest Airlines and the Southwest and ATN pilots is ratified.
 
In a labor/management thread I was thoroughly lambasted by many - including a mod and ATN Pilot for giving the management point of view and explaining that as management - we see labor as a necessary commodity like motor oil and that people generally represent a set of numbers - a payroll number with a corresponding salary number attached. I stated that even companies like SWA that "care" and have "luv" are only doing this because they have figured out that "happy" employees are generally cheaper over time than bitter ones - but don't take that to mean that Herb, Colleen, or Gary Kelly necessarily care if you live or die - they are simply doing it for a specific business reason to get a specific business outcome.

Well...I was hammered...called intransigent...put on "ignore"...etc.

Wonder who's right? Them or me?

LOL...SWA is going to look at the math. Piss off a bunch of homegrown pilots, or piss off a much smaller number of acquired employees. The math isn't hard - and given SWA's proclivity to be excellent at business - hedging, operations, etc and given ALPA's seemingly weaker position and track record of late (TWA vs. ALPA loss, USAPA, etc) I'm betting on SWA/SWAPA to win this battle in some way. SWA probably has pretty competent attorneys - they didn't seem to skimp on other professional help - and I can't see any way that ATN pilots win this deal.
 
. ALPA will roll over as usual. Why do you think they "negotiated" regional lift at AirTran. Pathetic.

I am willing to bet ALPA won't be there when ATN pilots need it most.

We fought hard for scope improvements in this contract, and we achieved them. We are receiving all of the help we could ever possibly ask for from ALPA.

I'm about done with ALPA since they made a clerical error and asked me to pay 30% more dues for the year.

So a "clerical error" is unforgivable in your book? Make sure you point that out to your assistant chief pilot the next time you make a simple mistake on the job.

I'm not unhappy with the structure in place with our local council (though electing a guy to MEC Chair that the DTW pilots successfully recalled blows my mind).

Recalled? I think you mean "wasn't re-elected." Big difference.

Why aren't you appalled that a new scope sale occurred and the ATN MEC endorsed it?

Have you even read our scope section? Have you read the old contract's scope section?

National should never sign contracts that have cutthroat pay scales and/or scope problems that allow whipsaw at any level. Where are NATIONAL CRJ200 rates? Or 50 seat rates? All 50 seat operators should pay the same.

Those are nice thoughts, but not really achievable in the real world. We have to work within the confines of the Railway Labor Act.

I am going to attend LEC meetings to get my next item on the agenda: MEC positions should be voted on by the pilots. In fact, National positions should be voted on by the dues-payers. I don't trust the political system to properly sort out who needs to be in charge without my direct input. You know as well as I do that many Reps look toward the ultimate ALPA position. Tough to get if you don't play the politics. Those positions are too important to have LEC/MEC/National politics influence them.

The AirTran pilots got rid of our in-house union, and one of the major problems with it was the fact that the executive officers (the same as MEC Officers) were elected directly by the pilots. It is contradictory to say that the executive officers need to carry out the will of the BOD (or MEC) when they are directly elected by the membership. We had problems with executive officers claiming that they didn't need to follow BOD direction, because they were elected by the pilots, and they were going to carry out what they personally believed was the will of the pilots. It was a nightmare. The APA has gone through the same problems. It is a structure that doesn't work.

My dad told me that Herb (who's no longer involved in the day to day operations) personally flew to Atlanta to tell the AirTran pilots that if they didn't get on board with a deal he would furlough all of them and sell off their assets. Which is harsh but understandable when you build a company based on happy employees.

Not true.

Southwest bought Airtran therefore they can do what they like with the assets. Put up or shutup.

Not the way it works.

I still don't know why AirTran pilot's would care about seats or bases or seniority if they're making 30% more. The only reason I go to work is to make money, otherwise I stay home and do things I actually find enjoyable.

Ask your dad if he would be willing to downgrade to FO if it paid $10,000 more. Let me know when he stops laughing. It's not always about money, and as the Train pointed out, money is fleeting, seniority is forever.

From my understanding they did ask for DOH. Todd can you clarify?

Many proposals have been made over the past few months, some better than DOH, some less.

And in that sense, I strongly feel based on WN's prior actions, they will show no mercy in transfering all flying plane by plane to WN from FL if things get nasty.......IF. When I read this in the agreement the ALPA made with WN I could not believe they agreed to that. Does anyone else see the significance of this in the event it goes down the wrong path?

I'm not sure what agreement you're talking about, but our contract does not allow what you're contemplating. No more than 8% of our system block hours, or the assets that generate them, can be transferred. (some of that scope improvement that cencal apparently isn't up to speed on)

Do contracts at Airtran still stay when SW buys them?

Yes.

When the certificates merge, are the pilot groups still able to be under separate contracts? If it is possible, what will happen to that ATN Holding Company scope keeping the pilots from getting dropped?

Our holding company side letter is binding on all successors, so the obligations transferred to Southwest.
 
Our holding company side letter is binding on all successors, so the obligations transferred to Southwest.

I take the so called "rolling over" of ALPA on some parts of the scope was to lock in great scope for the immediate need of good buyout/merger scope. In which case that would have been a good move by ALPA. Especially since the Southwest Scope seems to have already eliminated at least part of the weak side of ATN's scope.
 
rockem_sockem_robots.jpg


The colors seem appropriate.
 
So AirTran's scope was so terrible that a scope sale actually netted better scope?

Wow...

If that was the strategy they were working then they did a good job. As an example, Southwest's scope did kill off the SkyWest flying.

I don't have the scope language in front of me but I would love to view it to see what is going on. Google hasn't helped.
 
So AirTran's scope was so terrible that a scope sale actually netted better scope?

Wow...

You are still missing the point. The bigger threat to AirTran's pilots was succesorship and scope for their planes, not their routes. 8% farmed out flying is pretty damn good when you look at the rest of the language (which you really should before making statements like that).
 
You are still missing the point. The bigger threat to AirTran's pilots was succesorship and scope for their planes, not their routes. 8% farmed out flying is pretty damn good when you look at the rest of the language (which you really should before making statements like that).

Well then show me the language. Successorship clauses shouldn't cause the current parent company anything, so using routes as a bargaining chip is unnacceptable.

I guess my question is - did they scope out flying? If the answer is yes, I am pissed. Might as well not be ALPA. We are not a good, true national union - like we should be, we are a hodgepodge of smaller independents. I think DPA is a great idea.
 
Well then show me the language. Successorship clauses shouldn't cause the current parent company anything, so using routes as a bargaining chip is unnacceptable.

I guess my question is - did they scope out flying? If the answer is yes, I am pissed. Might as well not be ALPA. We are not a good, true national union - like we should be, we are a hodgepodge of smaller independents. I think DPA is a great idea.
What does no outsourced flying scope help if you don't have the scope to protect you from being acquired and then having your planes or routes shifted to another carrier under the same holding company (ala Freedom or GoJets) and having all your pilots laid off? Kind of like how some of the people in this very thread are salivating and wishing SWA would do?

I assume you meant it doesn't "cost" the parent company anything -- that isn't necessarily true, but the more important aspect is not what it "costs" but what it is worth to the pilots -- this type of security is worth a great deal and if you think a company negotiator will give it to you for free out of the goodness of his heart then either you're an idiot or you've been sucking down the kool-aid far too long.
 
I'm starting my 11th year at SWA, hired in 2000. Still seating in the right seat. I just love it when AT guys on here say they deserve to go over top of me and get to keep the their seat and they are 5 years junior to me. LOL!! They are going to get a huge pay raise, huge benefits, and job sercurity and they still think they are entiltled to my seniority as well. LOL!! I hear a lot about SWA guys being selfish on these forum. LOL!! Right.
 
I'm starting my 11th year at SWA, hired in 2000. Still seating in the right seat. I just love it when AT guys on here say they deserve to go over top of me and get to keep the their seat and they are 5 years junior to me. LOL!! They are going to get a huge pay raise, huge benefits, and job sercurity and they still think they are entiltled to my seniority as well. LOL!! I hear a lot about SWA guys being selfish on these forum. LOL!! Right.

On the contrary. If SWAPA had offered DOH that would be one thing. Relative seniority ensures you maintain the same or close to the same position percentage-wise. Heck, there could even be a fence with ratios that dictate how many SWA vs AT pilots are to be awarded CA in a vacancy.

Don't purely consider your DOH or seniority number in an integration. If it goes to arbitration, it is possible that someone hired 5 years after you might be above, if your %age is 50 and theirs is 40.
 
I'm starting my 11th year at SWA, hired in 2000. Still seating in the right seat. I just love it when AT guys on here say they deserve to go over top of me and get to keep the their seat and they are 5 years junior to me. LOL!! They are going to get a huge pay raise, huge benefits, and job sercurity and they still think they are entiltled to my seniority as well. LOL!! I hear a lot about SWA guys being selfish on these forum. LOL!! Right.

I completely get what you are saying here, and this is exactly the kind of animosity I'm rooting for...but by the same token, if being a SWA FO is better than a CA at some other places, the pay is exceptional, etc...then you shouldn't be bothered in having to be one longer either. I mean, if it allows the airline to keep growing and maintaining the peace and "culture" and all...and since an FO job, while not a captain job for sure, is still awesome...then it shouldn't bother you much to eat the same sandwhich the ATN pilots are being asked to consume.
 
Back
Top