FUD.My dad told me that Herb (who's no longer involved in the day to day operations) personally flew to Atlanta to tell the AirTran pilots that if they didn't get on board with a deal he would furlough all of them and sell off their assets. Which is harsh but understandable when you build a company based on happy employees.
It does. It has happened before with Southwest. Pilot groups not at each other's throats is a good thing.
Exactly, the last thing management wants is an unhappy pilot group. I know my dad has gotten calls in the last few years about not doing grey area things to help the company out. That's the way the guys who have been at the company 30 years fly though. He flew with captains that were initial hires in the 70s who would teach you to fly as fast as you can to the marker, taxi fast and turn around as quickly as possible. They had a ton of loyalty for the company that manifested itself in $10 million payouts in stock when they retired.
That whole company is built on having a happy employee group and lately the pilots, especially the senior FOs that expected to upgrade, are not happy. And the loyalty goes both ways. Herb would rather keep his core employees happy than make money off of AirTran's assets. I still don't know why AirTran pilot's would care about seats or bases or seniority if they're making 30% more. The only reason I go to work is to make money, otherwise I stay home and do things I actually find enjoyable.
Delta bought Northwest. We didn't staple. How could we be so stupid to not see it your way? If the plan is to prevent employee unrest, staple jobs are the last way to go.Southwest bought Airtran, therefore all of Southwest pilots should be ahead of Airtran in seniority. Staple it!
Whoah. Isn't saying "Period" before a "." or even at all at the end of a sentence redundant? Apologies in advance!![]()
Delta bought Northwest. We didn't staple. How could we be so stupid to not see it your way? If the plan is to prevent employee unrest, staple jobs are the last way to go.
I agree, but the disparity between your two carriers wasn't of this magnitude. Would you feel the same way if say Delta would have bought Air Tran and they asked for the same DOH over DL pilots? I don't think a staple is a fair resolution, but asking for DOH is not fair and equitable either.
I agree, but the disparity between your two carriers wasn't of this magnitude. Would you feel the same way if say Delta would have bought Air Tran and they asked for the same DOH over DL pilots? I don't think a staple is a fair resolution, but asking for DOH is not fair and equitable either.
That would undoubtedly trigger a buttload of lawsuits, not to mention the unwanted attention of DOJ, DOL, and any Senator or Congressman who represents the affected folks.Could southwest release all the airtran pilots but keep the planes?
I agree, but the disparity between your two carriers wasn't of this magnitude. Would you feel the same way if say Delta would have bought Air Tran and they asked for the same DOH over DL pilots? I don't think a staple is a fair resolution, but asking for DOH is not fair and equitable either.
What's the big disparity here though, other than pay, which, again, is temporary? They both fly the same planes on the same types of routes.
Because this is SOUTHWEST and ex-Valuejet.
Airtran never asked for DOH, so not sure why you bring it up. Regardless, a Delta/AAI merger is completely different than the SWA/AAI deal. The career expectation of both AAI and SWA is to retire a 737 captain. While SWA is older, a relative seniority merge, starting at the year AAI came into exsistance would work.It protects the SWA guys senior to the most senior AAI dude.
In your example, the career expectation is different. 737 captain vs 777/747 captain. If we merged with AAI, or any other 737 operater, (!,) I would expect a relative seniority merge, with everything bigger than a 737 fenced for some predetermined length of time.
What's the big disparity here though, other than pay, which, again, is temporary? They both fly the same planes on the same types of routes.
Bam.
Pilots have this mythical view of Southwest, and don't get me wrong, everybody I've met there have been FANTASTIC people. I mean like seriously, GREAT PEOPLE. Decent pay, sounds like a wonderful place to work. In all honesty, nothing bad to say about the place.
BUT.
This is a business transaction, and and there are interests to be watched out for. More money now means NOTHING if you lose your job because of a furlough. And for the guys that say seniority means nothing, pay means everything, look at the TWA staple to the American list; if 9/11 hadn't happened, most, if not all of those guys wouldn't have lost their jobs. But because of 9/11, most (all?) of the "American" pilot furloughs were the TWA pilot group.
It's hard to make this comment without offending guys, so a disclaimer I mean no harm but I've noticed that directly sitting in the jump on mainline carriers for 6 years now, there is a lot of jealousy between legacy pilots directed at southwest pilots. I've heard everything from "I wouldn't be caught dead flying 5 legs a day on the Guppy for the rest of my life" to "I don't want to haul trailer trash around the USA". I think this is contributing towards a lot of guys claiming its a merger of two equals when it is not.
Not sure that would square with the public good guy image SWA is trying to maintain.