surreal1221
Well-Known Member
I really never got the point of this thread from the very second post. Surreal, I don't get it and I usually domn't have much issue with your posts. Seems to me the fact is salaries are piss poor. So what if they're actually 2, 3 or even 5K above the official federal declared by god poverty line. They're still poverty wages period. Why you would even waste time arguing that is beyond me?
If I make 60K, ok yeah in probably 80% of cities that's a great livable wage. In NYC, that's pretty much poiverty level wages. 4 times above the official level. It's all relative. The point is, regional airline salaries are piss poor, many charter and freight joints' salaries are piss porr. Amerijet's salaries are piss poor. Why even bother to argue the Amerijet union statement on the basics of semantics?
Initially, I took issue with the IBT claiming that their flightdeck crew members were making poverty level wages in a public press release.
Perhaps I'm alone in thinking that it'd be wise for a union to be honest with the flying public rather than insert subtle lies that not too many people would evaluate to see if they are indeed factual.
It's already been beaten to death, but my point was merely to put an end to the usual fallacy of regional pilots making poverty wages as stated by the federal government. I also don't consider compiling the data to be arguing. But, if it works for you, it works for you.
Jynxyjoe got it on page two.
jynxyjoe said:Surreal is correct that we do not make the Fed definition of poverty level, he has also said a couple times he is not defending the crap pay we get. The reality is, there aren't real federal definitions for what we get paid.
Surreal brought up a good point, the arguments by the unions need to be based on facts.
Yes, they're low. Yes, we must continue to improve them. Yes, we must also continue to put time and effort in improving our work rules and benefits. We should never say enough is enough.