What plane do you have nostalgia for?

All my time is in 172s so far, but I really hope I get to fly a swift one day. As a passenger, I loved the 737-200, sitting right behind the engine was great.
 
As much as I love the Tomcat, for Naval tacair........the Crusader gives it a run for it's money in the cool department IMHO.

P-3 are "tacair" Can even shoot slam-ers :D And that is just air to mud. Aire a Agua, they can throw all sorts of stuff. how tactical can you get;)

I would have to disagree with Finsup about it being ugly. The EP, well she might be considered ugly. But I know for a fact it flies, so all in the eye of the beholder.

One of its predecessor the PBY Catalina is pretty high on my cool list too.
 
YS-11....

My first type rating. Probably because I had so little time in it, and none with a payload. Just training and ferry time.

?? so it wasn't the airplane but the rite of passage? I can understand. Driving that old dog out of Bluefield and ROA and CRW at heavy weight in the summer, sweating like a dog and watching that crazy engine RPM indicator go round and round.

"14.2 and 880!". Wasn't that the call? (14.2 and 770?)
 
One's I miss seeing
Curtis C-46 coming into the ramp, bouncing slightly as the brakes squeal in protest and those big radials just barking.

Constellation cranking up and the blue smoke that would drive the enviros nuts today. Then powering up to taxi out and noting that in sharp turns the outside nosewheel comes off the ground.

727. 50% wing disassembly on final. JT8Ds proudly displaying 15,000lbs of thrust via smoke and noise.

DC-8-60 and 70 series. Long and sleek. The freight dogs really look good in those paint schemes.

Convair 880. Just looking at it you know it is fast.

Caravelle. European grace. Pretty wing.

Concorde. Enough said.

Millitary
F-8 Crusader. No way it could fly in today's environment. Have to be renamed.

F-105. Like Concorde, enough said.

A-1 Skyraider. A cross between ugly muscle and all business.

Civilian
Lear 23. See F-105 and Concorde

Cessna 195. The sound alone makes it a winner.

and of course, a Globe Swift. Guaranteed to ignite conversation where ever it is.
 
I really like the Baron. Part 91 BE-58 would be just....absolutely ideal.

-mini

I second that motion. I did my ME in a Baron, it's probably one of my favorites to this day...of course my aviation career hasn't been very long either!
 
The Baron is SUCH a cool plane to fly... Fast, big-plane-feel, beautiful... I love this plane. I hope I get to own one somewhere down the line...
 
?? so it wasn't the airplane but the rite of passage? I can understand. Driving that old dog out of Bluefield and ROA and CRW at heavy weight in the summer, sweating like a dog and watching that crazy engine RPM indicator go round and round.

"14.2 and 880!". Wasn't that the call? (14.2 and 770?)

It might have been 15.2. 880 sounds right, unless you lose one, the it was 1000.

I think too, because flying it made me think I was an Air America pilot....:crazy:
 
The Baron is SUCH a cool plane to fly... Fast, big-plane-feel, beautiful... I love this plane. I hope I get to own one somewhere down the line...

I love the ones we fly here at work. Definitely makes the coolest sound of any horizontaly-opposed piston engine out there. Not a radial but it will do until I find that dream job flying some guy's Beech 18 with floats.
 
Piper Super Cub or that "imposter" the Aviat Husky. I enjoy flying these airplanes more than anything. Low and slow with the door open in the late afternoon on a summer day. Cant beat it.
 
Lockheed P2V-5 & -7. Two turnin' & two burnin'...'nuf said!
That rudder and vertical just might give one an idea of what it is like with an engine out.
DSC_6027%20P2V-5%20N1386C%20Tanker%2044%20left%20side%20l.jpg
 
That rudder and vertical just might give one an idea of what it is like with an engine out.

From what I've been told, in development the actual rudder area was reduced as full, sudden rudder deflection had caused the entire vertical stabilizer to tweak!

Of course, the P2V was designed originally without the jets. The -5 series Neptune was retrofitted with the Westinghouse J-34 turbojets, & the -7 series Neptune's came from the Lockheed factory with them installed. Engine outs on takeoff are certainly a serious concern, especially when the field is high & hot.
 
From what I've been told, in development the actual rudder area was reduced as full, sudden rudder deflection had caused the entire vertical stabilizer to tweak!

Tweak as in leave the airplane? Yes, and that has been proven on other airframes including the B-52 and the A300.

Of course, the P2V was designed originally without the jets. The -5 series Neptune was retrofitted with the Westinghouse J-34 turbojets, & the -7 series Neptune's came from the Lockheed factory with them installed. Engine outs on takeoff are certainly a serious concern, especially when the field is high & hot.
The Japanese converted some of their Neptunes to turboprops. The P2J built by Kawasaki.
Kawasaki-P-2J.jpg


Which is a long way from the original P2V
P2V-1_SB2_640.jpg


And then there was the P2Vs operated by the US ARMY in Vietnam.

131531_AP-2E_1969-08-06_1000.jpg
 
Back
Top