Tomcat
nuff said :rawk:
As much as I love the Tomcat, for Naval tacair........the Crusader gives it a run for it's money in the cool department IMHO.
Tomcat
nuff said :rawk:
As much as I love the Tomcat, for Naval tacair........the Crusader gives it a run for it's money in the cool department IMHO.
YS-11....
My first type rating. Probably because I had so little time in it, and none with a payload. Just training and ferry time.
Planes I have flown and miss.
Piston – Globe Swift
Jet – Falcon 20 and Saberliner 60
I really like the Baron. Part 91 BE-58 would be just....absolutely ideal.
-mini
?? so it wasn't the airplane but the rite of passage? I can understand. Driving that old dog out of Bluefield and ROA and CRW at heavy weight in the summer, sweating like a dog and watching that crazy engine RPM indicator go round and round.
"14.2 and 880!". Wasn't that the call? (14.2 and 770?)
As much as I love the Tomcat, for Naval tacair........the Crusader gives it a run for it's money in the cool department IMHO.
The Baron is SUCH a cool plane to fly... Fast, big-plane-feel, beautiful... I love this plane. I hope I get to own one somewhere down the line...
That rudder and vertical just might give one an idea of what it is like with an engine out.Lockheed P2V-5 & -7. Two turnin' & two burnin'...'nuf said!
That rudder and vertical just might give one an idea of what it is like with an engine out.
From what I've been told, in development the actual rudder area was reduced as full, sudden rudder deflection had caused the entire vertical stabilizer to tweak!
The Japanese converted some of their Neptunes to turboprops. The P2J built by Kawasaki.Of course, the P2V was designed originally without the jets. The -5 series Neptune was retrofitted with the Westinghouse J-34 turbojets, & the -7 series Neptune's came from the Lockheed factory with them installed. Engine outs on takeoff are certainly a serious concern, especially when the field is high & hot.