planediveguy
New Member
Re: What is the Enrollment vs actually Hired ratio
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Invitation is still open, and the purpose is not to change your mind. But allow you to be more credible in your criticism. Everything that you post regarding DCA is based on hearsay. I'm sure the route you took works great and I understand that you are a proponent of it and always will.
[/ QUOTE ]
It would be one thing to question Don's credibility if his comments were directed towards the quality of training, or facilities, or aircraft, or anything else that really requires on-site verification. But since his critique has only been against the marketing and advertising tactics of your employer, I fail to see how you can use a word like "hearsay" and keep a straight face. We can read advertisments and observe marketing strategies and have valid opinions on those topics without visiting your school, don't you think?
[/ QUOTE ]
I would agree with you IF the complaints were only directed towards the marketing, you can have an opinion about it and not like the order or way that the facts are presented. BUT there is way more negative comments about the program, and how much better it is to pursue a different route. All based on cost of training and comments from students that were not happy with their experience. And that is what I meant when I used the word "hearsay".
And the purpose of the visit would be to show him that DCA is a viable option, that higher standards of training, the very thing that gets students to their limits IS what make DCA worthwile.
But if a student or instructor give a positive tone to their post, then it is received with hostility and viewed as "propaganda". or "someone that drank too much of DCA's cool-aid" and nosense like that.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Invitation is still open, and the purpose is not to change your mind. But allow you to be more credible in your criticism. Everything that you post regarding DCA is based on hearsay. I'm sure the route you took works great and I understand that you are a proponent of it and always will.
[/ QUOTE ]
It would be one thing to question Don's credibility if his comments were directed towards the quality of training, or facilities, or aircraft, or anything else that really requires on-site verification. But since his critique has only been against the marketing and advertising tactics of your employer, I fail to see how you can use a word like "hearsay" and keep a straight face. We can read advertisments and observe marketing strategies and have valid opinions on those topics without visiting your school, don't you think?
[/ QUOTE ]
I would agree with you IF the complaints were only directed towards the marketing, you can have an opinion about it and not like the order or way that the facts are presented. BUT there is way more negative comments about the program, and how much better it is to pursue a different route. All based on cost of training and comments from students that were not happy with their experience. And that is what I meant when I used the word "hearsay".
And the purpose of the visit would be to show him that DCA is a viable option, that higher standards of training, the very thing that gets students to their limits IS what make DCA worthwile.
But if a student or instructor give a positive tone to their post, then it is received with hostility and viewed as "propaganda". or "someone that drank too much of DCA's cool-aid" and nosense like that.