you… haven’t really paid attention to society lately have youI'm sure he'll resort to the usual hand waving about why he's right and everyone else is wrong, but eventually people will start seeing he's a clown.
...sigh.you… haven’t really paid attention to society lately have you
I'm sure he'll resort to the usual hand waving about why he's right and everyone else is wrong
I actually stooped to watching Blancowhateverhegoesby on the topic because, well, it's the one time I feel like using my eyeballs on it. Just from looking at the tapes I am glad nobody was killed. And of course your stuff gets impounded after a crash, ya ninnies!In a move that surprises no one, Dan is accusing the NTSB of stealing his personal property (a GoPro) and the purpose of the flight was for DG to show us that he is a superior airman compared to the pilots that perished in the Chino accident.
Oh how the turntablesThe fact he is accusing the NTSB of stealing his GoPro is soooooooo funny.
I know the both the Cub and Super Cub don't neither does the Cessna 170 or 180. I don't know about bigger singles like a DHC-2 or -3 and I've never flown a twin with conventional landing gear.Does a Citabria or a Cub have a lock?
Does a Citabria or a Cub have a lock?
Like I said I don't have a tail wheel endorsement but I've always thought most taildraggers locked. I guess on the the smaller, lighter airplanes a detent would make more sense.Not typically. There might be special cases where some have a locking tailwheel but both typically have Scott tailwheels which are steerable but outside of the detent, free castering.
Like I said I don't have a tail wheel endorsement but I've always thought most taildraggers locked. I guess on the the smaller, lighter airplanes a decent would make more sense.
I actually like Juan’s channel. There are a couple accident/debrief type channels I like. DG however is a clown…
The fact he is accusing the NTSB of stealing his GoPro is soooooooo funny.
I don't have a tail wheel endorsement but I have spent a fair amount of time around them, if memory serves they all have tail wheel locks and their use is always specifically for landing and take-off, the more engines or more power is added into the equation the more important they become. Does a Citabria or a Cub have a lock?
My exposure to the North American airplanes is minimal, and I’m sure someone here has more experience on these than I do, but I remember the T6 has a locking tailwheel interconnected to the yoke. Full aft (three point landing) locks the wheel and forward stick releases it for taxing. I think that’s the same setup for the Mustang also, but again on those airplanes I’m not as familiar with and could be incorrect.
On the twin engine tailwheel airplanes, just about every one I’ve been around or flown has a locking tailwheel, which is absolutely necessary given the large moment from the CG, or asymmetrical thrust situation that can occur.
more sense in these 2 messages than in DG's big toe - should JC have a youtube channelThere are T6s without that but most have converted P51 tailwheel setups which is where that locking setup comes from with the stick going full forward to unlock (at least as I understand, these are Mustang tailwheel conversions). Every T6 I have flown has had that setup.
You unlocked (SWIDT?) something in my dumb head, although I don't recall from which airplane, about the stick position unlocking the tail wheel.As @Inverted mentioned, many of the light singles have a breakaway detent such as the Scott 3200/3400 series or Maule. The probability of having a locking tail wheel on smaller airplanes is proportionate to the rudder effectiveness and ground looping. Airplanes with higher rudder authority (most light GA planes such as Cubs, Citabria, Maule) generally have the Scott or Maule tailwheel which doesn’t lock. However, the Haigh locking tailwheel is popular on the Pitts, which I consider more of a task management device as the rudder on the Pitts is very effective and responsive. I have flown the Pitts with all three of those tail wheels, and the Maule tailwheel with out the lock is more than adequate.
My exposure to the North American airplanes is minimal, and I’m sure someone here has more experience on these than I do, but I remember the T6 has a locking tailwheel interconnected to the yoke. Full aft (three point landing) locks the wheel and forward stick releases it for taxing. I think that’s the same setup for the Mustang also, but again on those airplanes I’m not as familiar with and could be incorrect.
On the twin engine tailwheel airplanes, just about every one I’ve been around or flown has a locking tailwheel, which is absolutely necessary given the large moment from the CG, or asymmetrical thrust situation that can occur.