The Attack on the 2nd Amendment Continues

Hacker15e said:
timthumb.php
Click to expand...
I stand corrected..
 
Just to remind everyone about the intent of Sen Feinstein when she says she wants 'sensible gun control':

 
Hacker15e said:
Just to remind everyone about the intent of Sen Feinstein when she says she wants 'sensible gun control':

Click to expand...
Seriously you can't possibly ever hope to achieve that despite what any law says. This is not the UK or Australia. I know of some ranches where they'd have to call in the national guard if they ever hoped to confiscate their weapons. First of all because the sheriff would be protecting the rancher. And they'd only end up taking guns from dead people. This is also why I actually LIKE unregistered weapons, and if I do own any, they are unregistered(legally).
What that law would achieve is something akin to Waco, TX in 100,000 different locations.
 
Hacker15e said:
Just to remind everyone about the intent of Sen Feinstein when she says she wants 'sensible gun control':
Click to expand...

To be fair, it seems pretty clear that she is talking about an outright ban on "assault weapons' and not disarming Americans of all firearms like the video title claims. Not saying her idea is a good one, and in reality she is just one vote and she still does not have the votes she needs to do anything extreme.
 
Think the biggest problem I have with the whole fear of outlawing "assault weapons" is the fact they would have to define exactly what it is about them that is illegal.

I have a feeling that the biggest, and probably only, component that they will be able to win support for is the magazine size. Without the "massive" magazines, any "assault weapon" is identical to any other Savage or Winchester on the market.
 
Patrick said:
http://www.youtube.com/embed/pwadYRL_vVg
Click to expand...

Pretty good interview. Note that the CNN 'journalist', as soon as she is challenged on the concept of allowing teachers to carry, immediately switches to demonization of 'assault weapons', and when challenged on that she immediately pivots over to 'gun show loophole' and 'massive ammo clips', and on to the results of a CNN poll that she even misrepresents the results of.

Journalism at its best. Apparently they don't want to actually discuss the topics.
 
Hacker15e said:
Pretty good interview. Note that the CNN 'journalist', as soon as she is challenged on the concept of allowing teachers to carry, immediately switches to demonization of 'assault weapons', and when challenged on that she immediately pivots over to 'gun show loophole' and 'massive ammo clips', and on to the results of a CNN poll that she even misrepresents the results of.

Journalism at its best. Apparently they don't want to actually discuss the topics.
Click to expand...

Exactly. No surprises here....
 
First they'll ban these so called assault weapons. Because, you don't need an assault weapon to go deer hunting. Right?

Then they'll ban hand guns because you don't need a hand gun to go deer hunting. Right?

Then they'll ban shotguns because you can't eat deer meat with all those pellets in it. Right?

Then they'll ban rifles because, well, they've banned all other guns so why the hell not?

Then you'll have roving mobs of gang rapists like they have in India:

http://www.infowars.com/indian-women-turn-to-guns-after-gang-rape-outcry/

Indian Women Turn to Guns After Gang Rape Outcry


But country’s draconian gun control laws leave them defenseless
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
January 2, 2013
Women in Delhi are rushing to apply for gun licenses in the aftermath of the gang rape and murder of a 23-year-old medical student who died in hospital last weekend, but most will be left defenseless as a result of India’s strict gun control laws.
The story again illustrates how draconian gun control policies only serve to disarm victims while emboldening criminals.
On December 16, a couple boarded a bus in the Munirka area of Delhi on their way to Dwarka in the south-west of the city. The woman, who remains unnamed, was subjected to a brutal gang rape that lasted almost an hour before she and her companion were beaten with iron bars then thrown out of the bus into the street. The woman died from her injuries at a Singapore hospital last weekend. Six men were arrested for the murder and could face the death penalty.
The incident generated massive public outcry against the treatment of women in India and a call for tougher anti-violence laws. Figures show that a woman is raped in Delhi every 14 hours and rape cases have doubled in India since 1998. Government efforts to step up police patrols have failed to reduce the rate of violent crime targeting women.
After the story prompted global condemnation, women across Delhi responded by flooding the city’s licensing department with calls demanding to know how they could obtain firearms for self-defense.
“We have received over 1,200 calls since that day. These include not only the average working woman, but even students who travel long distances to colleges and even their concerned parents. They were eager to find out more on the procedure to acquire arms,” a Delhi police officer told the Times of India.
There have already been 274 applications from women since the incident, but most will be left defenseless as a result of India’s draconian gun control laws. To be granted a gun permit in India, applicants have to prove that their life is in immediate danger.
Typically, less than 10 per cent of women who apply for a gun are granted a license, and the majority of these are under an inheritance clause which allows them to own a firearm if their husband or father had a permit. In 2010 and 2011, over 600 applications for firearms in Delhi were rejected. The licensing system is also discriminatory against women, forcing parents to hand over weapons to their daughters as the only way to ensure self-defense.
When hundreds of concerned women turned up in person at the Delhi licensing office, they were told that the threat of rape and violent crime “could not be reason enough” for them to obtain a firearm, and officials were ordered by their superiors to hand the women a letter assuring them that “their daughters were indeed safe on Delhi’s roads.” How a letter would be any use against a violent rapist was not explained.
Almost all of the women who apply for a gun in the interests of self-defense following the gang rape will see their applications rejected and will continue to be at the mercy of sexual predators with no means of protection, once again re-affirming the fact that gun control laws create more victims while aiding violent criminals who are free to target the innocent knowing they will face little or no resistance.
 
TheFlyingTurkey said:
A Saudi Arabian imam, who is a very influential cleric in jihadist circles, has issued afatwa (religious edict) that essentially allows all jihadists fighting in Syria to rape women.

http://www.radicalislam.org/news/saudi-cleric-issues-fatwa-allowing-gang-rape-syrian-women
Click to expand...

And as young as 14 too. I say, thank God...I mean, Thank Allah! It's about time in my opinion. Those 14 year old little minx running around their strife and death-filled country are just asking for it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top