Skywest Questions

Opposite opinion here. I think the 175 will get slightly more senior as we get rid of 700s. Once the senior 700/900 snobs (I can say that because I was a 700 snob as an FO) can no longer hold, or have as good of trips as they do now, they will bid over to the 175. Pays more than the 700 anyways.

The seat lock is kind of a moot point anyways. Can be waved at any time by the company. @Autothrust Blue, weren't you "seat locked" when you upgraded?
 
You think the RJ flying will die down or both will have lots of flying but movement is better on the 175?

I think for anyone getting hired on in the CRJ or 175 today will have near equal opportunity of advancement in the first 2 years with the company seniority wise / bidding power as an FO. The CRJ and the 175 are both being stacked somewhat evenly so progression on one or the other won't be overly noticeable in a 2 year period for a person being hired today. Most guys who are currently CRJ FOs aren't going to transition to the E-175 as an FO. The CRJ FOs are looking to upgrade and move on. So even though the E-175 may be more senior as an FO overall, where you are on the seniority list coming in today it won't matter so much. Your progression I think will be fairly even for a CRJ and 175 guy getting hired today. Once you've been here 2-3 years upgrade is imminent, and then you can choose between upgrading to the more senior 175 or the more junior CRJ. If the music slows or stops, then at that point you can consider transition to CRJ FO or stay as a 175 FO after 2 years if upgrade is not imminent. The CRJ is definitely a more junior aircraft when it comes to upgrade there is no doubt about that. So if we say the 175 and CRJ are equal seniority wise for a new FO, then now you're looking at the type of flying. Senior FOs will take more of the 700/900 flying, and you'll be left to fly the 200. The difference in 175 trips at 200 trips is pretty big. The 200 does more Brasilia type routes while the 175 is doing more mainline type routes.

So now it depends on what base you want. If you have your heart set on a certain base then as an FO the CRJ in some instances may be better.

If you want PHX, TUS, COS, DTW, SLC or MSP I would recommend the CRJ (obviously these are CRJ only bases).

If you want SFO, LAX, SEA, PDX, ORD, or DEN I would recommend the 175 as more flying is headed that direction in those bases, and in some cases the CRJ is being downsized in some bases and removed in other of those bases and you'll have better trips overall on the 175 in these bases.

This is all my opinion. Each guy is going to have their own opinion on the matter. This is mine from the eyes of as if I was a perspective newhire. A year or even 6 months ago I would've recommended the CRJ, but now the 175 is really a much larger presence at the company than it was 6 months ago and that presence is only growing.

To answer your original question, the CRJ flying isn't going away, but the 175 is becoming a more equal presence in numbers. Movement I don't think is necessarily better for a newhire on the 175, but I think for a newhire movement in the CRJ and the 175 overall is equal for the most part for the first 2 years.
 
Last edited:
Opposite opinion here. I think the 175 will get slightly more senior as we get rid of 700s. Once the senior 700/900 snobs (I can say that because I was a 700 snob as an FO) can no longer hold, or have as good of trips as they do now, they will bid over to the 175. Pays more than the 700 anyways.

The seat lock is kind of a moot point anyways. Can be waved at any time by the company. @Autothrust Blue, weren't you "seat locked" when you upgraded?
I believe I am (my "lease lock" is a bigger deal than the "seat lock"). I'll look.
 
Ouch. That bad huh? The lack of communication from him has been downright unacceptable.
I agree wholeheartedly. BH is stepping into the void and doing a lot of talking that RJ should be doing - both to management and to the pilot group. And pretty much anything worthwhile - that isn't normalizing deviance from the PPM - has come from BH.

RJ for line pilot 2017.
 
Incidentally, I don't actually see a seat lock for me, but I'm pretty sure there's supposed to be one. I'll have to put my nose into the book to see what the lock is supposed to be.
 
Not sure why you'd go for a pretty for sure upgrade soon on the CRJ to a "maybe, in a little while" upgrade on the ERJ to be stuck in the right seat, making less money, for longer. You could be "slightly behind" and then the music could stop altogether.
And enjoy your seat lock.
 
I have to say that I am impressed with SkyWest already. I am only in CTP at the moment, but the 30 hours of ground was very informative and the instructor referenced SkyWest procedures for most of the topics. He would pass out checklists and QRH's for us to look at and what not. We even get to do the required 10 hours of sim in the plane we are flying, which I am sure will be huge for learning purposes. Tons of my friends went to different regionals and said CTP was a waste of time, but that is not the case with my experience with SkyWest as their CTP is internal.
 
I have to say that I am impressed with SkyWest already. I am only in CTP at the moment, but the 30 hours of ground was very informative and the instructor referenced SkyWest procedures for most of the topics. He would pass out checklists and QRH's for us to look at and what not. We even get to do the required 10 hours of sim in the plane we are flying, which I am sure will be huge for learning purposes. Tons of my friends went to different regionals and said CTP was a waste of time, but that is not the case with my experience with SkyWest as their CTP is internal.

SkyW has always had a good training department, I'm sure the CTP program would be no different. Good to hear you are enjoying it so far, my 11 years there were tons of fun and met lots of great folks.
 
I have to say that I am impressed with SkyWest already. I am only in CTP at the moment, but the 30 hours of ground was very informative and the instructor referenced SkyWest procedures for most of the topics. He would pass out checklists and QRH's for us to look at and what not. We even get to do the required 10 hours of sim in the plane we are flying, which I am sure will be huge for learning purposes. Tons of my friends went to different regionals and said CTP was a waste of time, but that is not the case with my experience with SkyWest as their CTP is internal.
It's nice to see it being useful; there's a lot to learn that doesn't fit nicely in the initial footprint, and hopefully, some of that gets covered.
 
Quick question regarding getting time off. I was just asked to be a groomsman at a good friends wedding in May. He is getting married in Cancun and I have to buy the all inclusive resort before March to ensure I am in the resort the wedding will take place in. It will cost roughly 1200 for 3 days for my girlfriend and I, so I am wondering how easy or hard it is to make sure I get a 4-5 days off in a row with Skywests bidding system. I am trying not to worry too much about it yet as I am not even close to being finished with training, but it would be nice to know getting that time off is doable for someone in their first year.
 
Quick question regarding getting time off. I was just asked to be a groomsman at a good friends wedding in May. He is getting married in Cancun and I have to buy the all inclusive resort before March to ensure I am in the resort the wedding will take place in. It will cost roughly 1200 for 3 days for my girlfriend and I, so I am wondering how easy or hard it is to make sure I get a 4-5 days off in a row with Skywests bidding system. I am trying not to worry too much about it yet as I am not even close to being finished with training, but it would be nice to know getting that time off is doable for someone in their first year.
-slow laugh-

Once you get online, try to put in golden days for it...
 
Back
Top