My earlier question sort of got lost in the shuffle, so I'll restate it: What would be accomplished by firing the crew?
Obviously they would need to be replaced. How can one be sure the crew who replaces them would be any better and not make a mistake of the same magnitude in the future?
If they're fired in order to send a signal to the pilot group to "sit up and fly right," would it actually improve safety? Or just encourage pilots to sweep mistakes under the rug, for fear of getting fired?
I can sort of understand the liability issue, if the crew has another problem in the future, with media/victims asking, "Why were they allowed a second chance?" Still, from a practical, financial standpoint, I wonder how this liability compares to the cost of training two new hires (to replace the crew you just fired, in theory).
I guess I'm just failing to see how firing the crew would help the situation at all. If a company is going to fire somebody, they ought to make sure it will actually improve the company, rather than trade one problem for another.