I suggest most of you look up what a just safety culture is, then get back to this thread. If you don't understand what a just safety culture is, you are looking even more ignorant.
Your former ALPA Airline had pilots land at the wrong airport, same one as CJC did. I believe the pilots kept their jobs.
Oh, by the way, for those saying 'FIRE THE PILOTS'
A safe and just culture doesn't imply permissiveness. (And yes, I've read Dekker's book on the subject, and I count it as one of my favorites.)I strongly believe in a just safety culture, however, I would still expect to lose my job over it. I wouldn't even argue it, either. That's true for every company I've worked for, even the ALPA one.
My comment above was along the lines of Dasleben's thinking. I'd be very surprised to walk out employed, at any company I've worked at, union or not.Oh no, you are definetly thinking about this rationaly and clearly. You definetly 'get it'.
The pilots who did land at the wrong airport were expecting to get canned with the investigation I worked. The lawyers didn't even need to get involved!
Once the layers of what happened were peeled back, there was more to it than the pilots actions.
Anyone...and I mean anyone that is not flying some kind of big-engined taildragger in bad weather with only a Rand McNally road-atlas for navigation is a complete (p)wussy and deserves to be fired. From whatever job they have.
What year Rand-McNally? I think I have a 1999 hanging around her somewhere.
My grandma riding in the back is more important then your job. That crew obviously isnt capable of operating in the 121 environment, and should be canned. I'm all for second chances, but I remember an RJ killing a whole bunch of people a while back. The system in place where we continue to spoon feed the weak to keep them employed is ridiculous. That system cost us a bunch of lives in Buffalo. Sorry dude, there are certain things you should be fired for, and this is one.
That's the thing - as much as I'd love to join a Huggie beat-down - I kind of see his point in a way. I also see ATN's point as well.
I understand and agree with ATN's "reckless and careless" standard - I'm just not sure that is where I'd place the bar - I'd probably want it more stringent. On the other hand - some of the best hires I've ever made were people that completely and totally blew-it on some project at there last job. If they are smart they won't make the same mistake again, and have been humbled - and nothing builds maturity like a good humbling.