I came down hard on Zimmerman because I am PRO gun rights - and therefore anyone that acts in a way that even calls into question the issue by the actions they take - I'm going to be harder on. I believe in a generally pro-management philosophy, but when you see a management act as badly as Pinnacle's or AMR's - I have to bring the hammer down because they give all of us a bad name. I am harder on my daughter because I expect more - same concept.
Problem was, in the Zimmerman case, you came to a hard conclusion before any facts surrounding the meat of the incident even came to light. It would be like you punishing Maggie for something that you heard went on at school, before even knowing what her role was in it or not.
In the case here in this thread, things are more clear-cut and out in the open, so I see your point well.
Firebird actually has this correct. I expect a lot out of employees, I measure them by numbers and data, and I am always willing to either replace a worker, outsource to technology that can do the job, or find ways to make them more productive. But - I treat them with dignity, they always know the score, and I always pay them on time. I simply think it would be unconscionable to screw with the wages you've promised and have already been earned. I don't know the personal financial issues my employees are facing - I'm assuming that I must fill a needed gap for them or they would find something else. I have to assume that every one of my employees is going to miss a mortgage payment, miss being able to buy meds for a sick kid or parent - even though they are all highly paid - and I NEVER screw with their paychecks. Paychecks are sacrosanct. I've had paychecks bounce before or simply not be there when I was young - I vowed to never put anyone in that position if I was in charge of people. I also have a very fun and open work environment believe it or not - in fact, I tell the employees my motor-oil analogy as relates to them to encourage them to use that same mentality when looking at expenditures for their own areas of responsibility. But you never screw with a persons check - it is like stealing.
Thats the thing that some don't get with your "motor oil" comment.....because they're taking the comment personally, rather than literally. Fact is, in the
macro picture of a business, as far as shareholders are concerned, people ARE essentially numbers and data in terms of is that company profiting or losing, nothing more.....and that includes both management as well as the workers. In the micro picture, people are indeed individuals as well as on the individual level. With your explanation above, that differentiation and the fact that you understand and respect that, should be more apparent to doubters, I would think.
Yeah...I know. Let them fire the entire pilot group. What are they trying to save anyway - a company that bonuses executives a month prior to declaring BK so they can jam a bad deal down the employees throats? People may think I have a harsh world-view regarding employees - but I never lie to them, I don't take bonuses unless everyone takes a bonus (and it's always a smaller percentage), and any investment return I get is just that - an investment return to compensate for the risk I have and the capital I havetied up. What's to save with Pinnacle? I would start doing wildcat strikes every missed payroll - with the understanding that the lemmings that don't participate are scab-like and weak.
Todd can correct me and would know better than me on this, but I
think what Todd is saying is "why knowingly walk into a minefield when you know there's a 100% chance of getting blown up, and no ability to not?", regards illegal job actions and any possible protections from doing them. I don't know.....maybe Im mis-interperting it....