NTSB: Plane didn't dive, but landed flat on house...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090214/ap_on_re_us/plane_into_home
Investigators did not offer an explanation as to why the plane ended up pointed away from the Buffalo airport, but it does raise the possibility the pilots were fighting an icy airplane: Air safety guidelines say pilots can try a 180-degree turn to rid a plane of ice.
What the writer did not understand was the 180 turn was to exit the icing conditions, not shake it off with a violent turn.
But the briefing does raise questions. At some point the nose had to be quite low to descend so rapidly or the earlier briefing about 'severe pitch and roll' changes makes no sense.
Does the Q400 have boots or heated leading edges? Is it possible in this situation that if the icing was bad enough it could have built up behind the leading edges? Though rare it does happen sometimes....
Does the Q400 have boots or heated leading edges? Is it possible in this situation that if the icing was bad enough it could have built up behind the leading edges? Though rare it does happen sometimes....
Looks like they about covered it there. What is so upsetting to you?
Remarkably, I didn't find it that bad. There are some good quotes in it.
The whole wage part was fine. It points out to the public a sad truth.Yeah I'm not sure what do think about this article. It seems to suggest that your life is in danger with young regional pilots but then retracts. Regardless, everything seems quite true other than a few misinterpretations. I think my biggest problem that I have with this article is that it seems quite pointless. But I do like how it shines the light on the misconceptions people have on pilots now a-days, such as the QOL and pay for regional pilots. I loved this quote, ""You won't make a livable income until you get in the left (captain's) seat," Smith said. "Pilots accept this as part of the game, and the companies do it because they can.""
What the writer did not understand was the 180 turn was to exit the icing conditions, not shake it off with a violent turn.
But the briefing does raise questions. At some point the nose had to be quite low to descend so rapidly or the earlier briefing about 'severe pitch and roll' changes makes no sense.
Matt, How you guys hanging in up there? I paticipated on two mishap investigation boards when I was in the Navy. It's tiring and mind numbing. You guys need anything let me know.I think you're BOTH speculating. And, quite possibly both WRONG.
Not trying to break your balls, but........let's leave the guessing out of it.
Edit: My apologies if this came out harsh.....been a long couple of days w/ many more to come.
One aspect of the investigation will focus on the crew, how they were trained and whether they had enough time to rest between flights. Other investigators focused on the weather, the mechanics of the plane and whether the engine, wings and various mechanics of the plane operated as they were designed to.
Matt, How you guys hanging in up there? I paticipated on two mishap investigation boards when I was in the Navy. It's tiring and mind numbing. You guys need anything let me know.
What the writer did not understand was the 180 turn was to exit the icing conditions, not shake it off with a violent turn.
But the briefing does raise questions. At some point the nose had to be quite low to descend so rapidly or the earlier briefing about 'severe pitch and roll' changes makes no sense.
I just have an absolute sick feeling about all of this and have been in a sort of depression since this happened. To all you Colgan guys & gals, hang in there and we've been praying for everyone involved.