Oh Alaska/Boeing

Just a reminder that some of us could easily end up in a morgue for not complying with instructions from an officer of the law. But if you’re high enough up the corporate ladder, it’s just a business tactic.
Are you saying those who are not complying right now should be arrested?
 
Seems the NTSB is getting frustrated with Boeing stonewalling



giphy.gif
 
Perhaps Boeing believes the FAA won’t do anything because Boeing is a unique whale among aerospace manufacturers.

Maybe the FAA should tag-in the FTC and OIG for a spell.
 
Gotta say, he seemed MUCH more prepared to discuss this topic than general newscasters. I like Jon’s show, but was still prepared for cringe-worthy aviation ignorance.

This segment was really well done.

Since they pulled clips from it, I'm going to guess he and his team pulled a lot from that documentary, which is fine since it was well done.
 
Another Max8 issue found.


Testing of the roll-out guidance servo removed from the 737 conducted on 28 February at Collins Aerospace’s facility in Iowa examined the potential effects of cold-soaking the components.

”Testing at room temperature found that the torque to rotate the servo’s output crank arm was within design specifications,” the agency says. The unit was then cold-soaked for 1h and re-tested, and investigators found ”that the torque to move the servo’s output crank arm was significantly beyond the specified design limits.” “
 
Another Max8 issue found.


Testing of the roll-out guidance servo removed from the 737 conducted on 28 February at Collins Aerospace’s facility in Iowa examined the potential effects of cold-soaking the components.

”Testing at room temperature found that the torque to rotate the servo’s output crank arm was within design specifications,” the agency says. The unit was then cold-soaked for 1h and re-tested, and investigators found ”that the torque to move the servo’s output crank arm was significantly beyond the specified design limits.” “
I thought they fixed this problem in the 90s...when it happened to 737s back then!
 
Another Max8 issue found.


Testing of the roll-out guidance servo removed from the 737 conducted on 28 February at Collins Aerospace’s facility in Iowa examined the potential effects of cold-soaking the components.

”Testing at room temperature found that the torque to rotate the servo’s output crank arm was within design specifications,” the agency says. The unit was then cold-soaked for 1h and re-tested, and investigators found ”that the torque to move the servo’s output crank arm was significantly beyond the specified design limits.” “
!@$!

AGAIN?
 
Another Max8 issue found.


Testing of the roll-out guidance servo removed from the 737 conducted on 28 February at Collins Aerospace’s facility in Iowa examined the potential effects of cold-soaking the components.

”Testing at room temperature found that the torque to rotate the servo’s output crank arm was within design specifications,” the agency says. The unit was then cold-soaked for 1h and re-tested, and investigators found ”that the torque to move the servo’s output crank arm was significantly beyond the specified design limits.” “
1709861270704.gif
 
I wonder if/when this same part started being used on 737NGs.

edit:
“Boeing said this is the only rudder-response issue reported on a Max, although two similar incidents happened in 2019 with an earlier model of the 737 called NG or next generation, which has the same rudder-pedal system.

The manufacturer said the issue was fixed by replacing three parts.”

 
Last edited:
Testing of the roll-out guidance servo removed from the 737 conducted on 28 February at Collins Aerospace’s facility in Iowa examined the potential effects of cold-soaking the components.

Hey, my little’s cousin’s husband has been an engineer there for quite a few years. I’ll have to ask him about this and if he took part in it
 
Back
Top