ctab5060X
Well-Known Member
Read up on the Railway Labor Act. That's what happened to strikes.....
That is about the best advice there is.
Read up on the Railway Labor Act. That's what happened to strikes.....
Im just going to go out on a limb here, so correct me if i am wrong,I am not a pilot yet. But if the pilots went on strike espically right now. The regionals would have no problem finding replacements for them. Is it just me that thinks that?Whatever happened to strikes?
![]()
Read up on the Railway Labor Act. That's what happened to strikes.....
Read up on the Railway Labor Act. That's what happened to strikes.....
Im just going to go out on a limb here, so correct me if i am wrong,I am not a pilot yet. But if the pilots went on strike espically right now. The regionals would have no problem finding replacements for them. Is it just me that thinks that?
You do have a point there. In my mind it would be alot cheaper if the airline would just buck up and pay their pilots a few more pretty pennys every hour. It would probably be sooooo much easier on everyone.Yes, but can you imagine how much it would cost to train a large mass of new pilots. I would guess in the millions if it was a large enough airline. Plus training takes a couple weeks, what are they suppost to do, not operate flights for a couple weeks? I'm not sure if that's the way it would work, but that's my guess.
You do have a point there. In my mind it would be alot cheaper if the airline would just buck up and pay their pilots a few more pretty pennys every hour. It would probably be sooooo much easier on everyone.
I skimmed an article about it. Basically from what I gathered is this...It's so hard to put together a strike and get through all the red tape, that most unions don't bother with it?? Or am I wrong? If not, that really changes how I look at unions. Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm just guessing/speculating.
Red tape is an understatement. Contracts under the RLA don't expire, they're "ammendable." When you hit your ammendable date, you can't just walk off the job like the USW or the UAW. Both sides have to keep operating under what's called "status quo" and continue to "bargain in good faith" to reach a new contract. In order to strike, the national mediation board has to declare an impasse in negotiations. We've been trying to get an impasse declared for nearly two years now. ASA was fighting for even longer, I believe, during their negotiations. Even then, all an impasse does is start the clock on a "30 day cooling off period." At the end of the 30 days, THEN either side is able to participate in "self help." This can be either a strike by the labor side, a lock out by management, OR management can even impose their terms of what they want in a new contract. But wait! If it could interrupt or severely impact commerce in the country, the president can appoint an Emergency Board that can keep both parties at the table and keeping either side from engaging in self help. Comair was the last airline allowed to strike back in 2001. The unofficial word from the White House under the Bush admin was "not again." The NMB is made up of three people, two from one political party and one from the other. So, you can see, any vote for an impasse would fall squarely on the side of "stay at the negotiating table." The reason all of the unions were so happy Obama won was b/c he got to appoint a new NMB member, thus swinging the balance the other direction......potentially. Hasn't happened yet, but we've got more than one airline out there that could test the waters soon.
Red tape is an understatement. Contracts under the RLA don't expire, they're "ammendable." When you hit your ammendable date, you can't just walk off the job like the USW or the UAW. Both sides have to keep operating under what's called "status quo" and continue to "bargain in good faith" to reach a new contract. In order to strike, the national mediation board has to declare an impasse in negotiations. We've been trying to get an impasse declared for nearly two years now. ASA was fighting for even longer, I believe, during their negotiations. Even then, all an impasse does is start the clock on a "30 day cooling off period." At the end of the 30 days, THEN either side is able to participate in "self help." This can be either a strike by the labor side, a lock out by management, OR management can even impose their terms of what they want in a new contract. But wait! If it could interrupt or severely impact commerce in the country, the president can appoint an Emergency Board that can keep both parties at the table and keeping either side from engaging in self help. Comair was the last airline allowed to strike back in 2001. The unofficial word from the White House under the Bush admin was "not again." The NMB is made up of three people, two from one political party and one from the other. So, you can see, any vote for an impasse would fall squarely on the side of "stay at the negotiating table." The reason all of the unions were so happy Obama won was b/c he got to appoint a new NMB member, thus swinging the balance the other direction......potentially. Hasn't happened yet, but we've got more than one airline out there that could test the waters soon.
:yeahthat:
Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on your view) 9E just might end up playing the part of the Guinea pig.
kell, any word on this past weekend (PM will work).
GOOD GOD!!! Kinda makes a person wonder if unions even work. How can it work if the main bargaining tool (strike) is virtually non-existant!!!
To be sure, the RLA is INSANELY management slanted.
Nobody put a gun to her head and made her take that job. Why not hold out for something at least on the same side of the country?
I wouldn't really call a strike the "main bargaining" tool. It's more of a nuclear option that no one really wants to use.
It's not!? Without getting really technical, what other power does a union have? I thought the main power of a union was "don't screw us over or we'll strike" What good is it if the government just passes laws to get around the working man and his union. And I'm being totally serious. I'm mad as hell! I didn't know they were abusing their power as early as 1926![]()
The amount of power depends on how strong of a union you have. The difference between "flying safe", and flying efficiently is incredible. But you've gotta have the balls to say, "Fly safe, fly the contract."
I know several that have and now do actually. We had quite a few guys on the 141 that had failed a few checks in the UPT, hence why they were on the 141 I am guessing. Know of several current day military dudes who have failed some checks as well.but fail a couple of checkrides in the military, and you're not going to be commanding an airplane with 50+ people on board.