Yes, yes I do. No, not at a commuter but at my company those are the rates for the more senior people.I feel like you don't really have those pay rates quite right.
Anyone know who the carrier was? If it was an RJ, that changes United's exposure significantly.
Yes, yes I do. No, not at a commuter but at my company those are the rates for the more senior people.
Legally? I really don't know. I don't think it matters.Anyone know who the carrier was? If it was an RJ, that changes United's exposure significantly.
The more senior they are the worse they treat passengers. And crew. That's what happens when you get fat dumb and happy in a unionized environment with almost no ramifications for your actions.For the more senior people maybe. But that's like saying "all pilots make 250,000!"
Some do...most don't.
Legally? I really don't know. I don't think it matters.
It says United on the plane. It says United on every article you can find on the "event". This is a United PR issue.
Looks like it was on an RJ. This is what happens when you don't completely control the product you put your customers on. Throw in using outsourced above/below wing ACS. Whether Eagle, Connection, or Expeess, they all have the ability to give the mainline a black eye.
No one cares if it was United or a subcontractor of United. The PR issue is the biggest issue in this whole event. The amount of money they'll pay if/when the passenger sues is peanuts.You'd think, but not the case. It might be a United PR issue, but legally, something else very different.
I still remember a time when (a) no camera phones and (b) a lot less entitlement.
"Sir we need your seat, we will reaccomodate you on another flight"
No drama.
Now people have Geraldo Rivera on speed dial, camera phones and "How dare they ask little girls (the non-revs) to not wear yoga pants (comply with the dress code for non-revs). I think they've been slighted and I get to play 'shame on United'"
Wait, I'm defending United. Do you think @Seggy will get triggered and make this about SouthernJets?
The more senior they are the worse they treat passengers. And crew. That's what happens when you get fat dumb and happy in a unionized environment with almost no ramifications for your actions.
When I was nonreving a couple years ago one of our agents sternly told a passenger "I'm not asking, I'm telling" when trying to check their bag. My mouth hit the floor. Ironically I found out later this person was fired from Delta. Oh the irony.
Maybe I should move because my neighbors dog pooped in my yardMaybe you should work for a better airline?
Maybe I should move because my neighbors dog pooped in my yard
Maybe I should move because my neighbors dog pooped in my yard
Jesus guys forget about the stupid "contract of carriage". We all know United can do whatever they want just like Wells Fargo can force all those customers who had accounts opened by their fraudulent actions could be forced into arbitration.
Ultimately if things like this continue to happen and be made a big deal out of (the kicker in this scenario is 1) the passenger was ALLOWED BACK ON and 2) he was black) and it costs United money things will change. Personally, I hope the guy sues United for all he can. He was let back on, that pretty much admits United screwed up and called the police on him for no reason.
Or get a bigger dog.
Or a mean cat.