Is reduced ALV an ask or a give? Seems like the airline would want to max out ALV on as few workers as possible. Giving dudes their direct contributions and sick days and vacation days and healthcare is 'spensive! Yet, at the same time, it seems like a large furlough would create an even larger mess of displacement bids and training. I'm not an airline guy, but where does the (multi-platform) airline fall out on that balancing act? Hell, if Delta furloughs 2000 people in October they're basically having to park 220, 717, some 737/320 just because they don't have any FOs. I know they'll train some in from July-September, but not that many. I have no data, but I don't think it would be a stretch to say that by the time everybody got on the street at 50-60 per month it would be time to start bringing them back in at 50-60 per month just to cover retirements (much less re-growth, lest I be called too positive, because as we know, demand is going to stay at 10% of 2019 levels forever, or at least until robots take over).