First officer training program?

The issue I'm probably going to run into with renting for time is the cost. Even if I am able to find a place who will rent me a twin to do cross countries in, the cost for the same number of hours is going to be somewhere between double and triple the cost of a FO program. The result will be a much longer period of time building than if I am able to find a job or do the FO program. Throwing away $25k might sound like a lot, but throwing away $60k for the same hours is just that much worse.

For being so methodical and thought-out you really haven't done any homework whatsoever. Your blind desire to do this pay-to-play, no matter what those who know better than you say, is proof that you'll do what you want. So, why even ask?

I refuse to help someone who asks for help but has all the answers. But I will say, multi-engine time can be as cheap as your $100/hr pay-to-play scheme. If you want to figure out how, you are surely more than capable.
 
You're 32! If you were 45, this may be a different discussion. You have lots and lots of time in front of you to fly 777s, if that's what you so desire. Like I said, flying a heavy jet is pretty boring. Lots of time on autopilot watching the miles tick down on the FMS. Talk on the radio sometimes, eat dinner, take a break. Land sometimes. Hell, I really love flying, but man, like MikeD said, the coolest thing I get to do is shoot an approach every once in a while. Maybe with a crosswind, if I'm lucky.

If you get there at 40, you'll have 25 years left of the above. Lots of time.

What about the ability to put your feet on the ground around the world for a few days every month. I know layovers are not vacations, but that's one of the big draws for me for those international routes. As for the boring part, I've always figured that I'd counter that with some flying for myself on the side, but then again, I'm a little more coo coo for cocoa puffs about aviation than the average bear.
 
For being so methodical and thought-out you really haven't done any homework whatsoever. Your blind desire to do this pay-to-play, no matter what those who know better than you say, is proof that you'll do what you want. So, why even ask?

I refuse to help someone who asks for help but has all the answers. But I will say, multi-engine time can be as cheap as your $100/hr pay-to-play scheme. If you want to figure out how, you are surely more than capable.

Since when have I expressed a blind desire to do the program? I may not be willing to dismiss it out of hand as quickly as some of you would like to see me do it, but I'm open to any and all alternatives other than instructing. As for your second point, I have looked into multi-engine time on many occasions and its never been as cheap as your $100/hr statement. Maybe I'm not looking in the right places, but aside from a few hints about finding a partner or buying my own plane, all I've ever been able to find locally are high cost rentals that the flight schools won't even allow out the door unless its for the purpose of instruction.
 
...I've always figured that I'd counter that with some flying for myself on the side, but then again, I'm a little more coo coo for cocoa puffs about aviation than the average bear.

image.jpg
 
Hell, I really love flying, but man, like MikeD said, the coolest thing I get to do is shoot an approach every once in a while. Maybe with a crosswind, if I'm lucky.

But, the bottom line is that you enjoy what you're doing overall, and that's all that really matters. The whole different strokes for different folks thing.

What about the ability to put your feet on the ground around the world for a few days every month.

Again, different strokes for different folks. Some people like the international thing. Myself, I've been to too many crappy places the world over in the past decade and a half, both peaceful as well as not so peaceful, that I just enjoy being in the U.S. of A, and at home in AZ or the southwest. Have had enough of anything international.
 
I suppose you're right, though such time would be of minimal use, and possibly not loggable (not 100% on the last point, so nobody come at me with claws out!). Pilots need to actually learn their craft, not just go through the motions to build time to meet minimums.
Granted this is NOT PFT/PFJ depending on the company, the issue comes in when you look at the legalities of logging it. Honestly, 250 hours of some time in the KingAir or the likes isn't worth it. I agree with looking into cross countries and time building like that.
Definitely just need to research and make sure they have an exemption for 61.51 in their opspec. If they do, it is loggable. If not then it isn't. Looking at the FAA's site there are no part 135 cargo companies that have the exemption other than AMF.

Not sure how Airnet did it when they hired into the right seat.
 
Stopped reading 5 pages in, so sorry if this has been said, but to the OP, your best bet is to network. This is the place to do it. Seriously. Don't want to be a CFI? 99% of the replies here have implied you would be doing. Even though some people out there don't care, many do, so chances are it will hurt more than help. But there is hope, low time jobs do exist. They're just hard to find. How do you find these jobs? You make friends, you get involved in this community and others like it, you develop relationships and make your goals known. Results won't be instant, but eventually, opportunities will start to unfold for you.

I once looked at AMFs pay to play program as something I wanted to do. I was 18, didn't know any better. I came here, I learned the error of my ways very quickly. I'd recommend you do the same. Most of the members on this board love to help out wherever they can, but only if you give them a reason to. Please take advantage of it.
 
With your responses of thinking you won't enjoy corporate because you're going to be treated like a bus driver, and also not enjoying the people, I again think you are going to struggle in any job aviation or not.

News flash - in any pilot job you're being paid and will be treated like a bus driver. That's what you are. You're either mowing the sky (survey) flying a tornado (skydivers) flying from point a to b and back (regional). In all these cases you're the driver, not a glorified astral professor, physicist, Nobel prize winner, or congressman. You move metal. Get over it.

Unless you're the president of a company you're going to be treated like an employee, which means a warm body who can get the work done. Take off your rose glasses but most importantly learn to enjoy people.

The way your posts come across is that you have people issues, that's a problem in this industry.
 
What about the ability to put your feet on the ground around the world for a few days every month. I know layovers are not vacations, but that's one of the big draws for me for those international routes. As for the boring part, I've always figured that I'd counter that with some flying for myself on the side, but then again, I'm a little more coo coo for cocoa puffs about aviation than the average bear.
Hahaha. As a long haul airline pilot, from my understanding, you are usually there in a layover city for minimum rest, or a zombie due to time changes and trying to re-acclimatize, if you actually try to switch time zones every time. Maybe some of the long haul guys can chime in on that.

As for business jets and the "attitude", I fly for some very down to earth people. Yes, there are bad apples out there. There are also a ton of crazy people that fly on airlines.

My last rotation, I had 3 days on the beach in Greece, and 4 days in Nice, France. We are probably heading to Geneva for a few days soon. We go skiing every winter, and in Feb or March spend a full week in the Maldives. I would say our layovers are decent. To each his or her own. Enjoy the pay-to-play scheme you seem very set on.

I keep trying to find jobs back in the US just due to being tired of 5000+ mile commutes, and there are none that will give me as much time off, or pay anywhere close to what I am making. I work 30/30 schedules. Yes, 30 on gets old quick, but 30 uninterrupted days off every other month makes it worth it. Enjoy the 777. I'll take business jets all day long...
 
Well, add me to the list that will throw you out of the interview when I learn how you got that time. Even if it's 15 years later, you now have 5000TT, and 250 of it is this crap. GTFO!

Like Cal Goat, I also did not CFI. Meat missiles for maybe 200 hours one summer, then survey. I flew something like 140 hours a month doing survey, which I don't even think is legal for CFI's.(not going to do the math). The company I flew survey for regularly would take wet commercials. When I was there, they even picked up a guy the day of his checkride, but he did do his training with them, they're a flight school to.
15 months after getting my Multi com(~300tt), I was flying for a freight company(I think I had 1300tt), and at the time could have gone to a regional instead(but I have self respect):D.
 
News flash - in any pilot job you're being paid and will be treated like a bus driver. That's what you are. You're either mowing the sky (survey) flying a tornado (skydivers) flying from point a to b and back (regional).

Giving glider rides, I will say that is the nicest anyone ever gets. At least every other customer tells you that you have the best job on earth. If I were getting paid for it, I would be inclined to agree :)

And before anyone says anything about "cheapening the profession," yes - it is true commercial operators charge two or three times what we do for soaring rides. A flying club is a different animal. By doing intro flights for the general public, it subsidizes the operation for members like me. They also paid for my CFI/Tailwheel and a few other things, in addition to my first paid teaching gig.

There isn't one right answer out there, but there are lots of good options.
 
It breaks my heart when someone uses this forum for an honest question, and he gets ridicule for asking. So what if you disagree with "pay to play" programs, that's your opinion. Look, the third response to his post was, "I don't like you already"... Of course he's going to be defensive after this, anyone would. Take a look of how you got to where you are. This career is hard and frustrating. Never forget the aviators who went an extra step to give you useful advice or walked in your resume for that "dream" job.

Greg, if want PM me. I will gladly try to help
Ryan
 
It breaks my heart when someone uses this forum for an honest question, and he gets ridicule for asking.
I disagree, this thread has been pretty civil with the reasons why/why not to enter into a program like this and it essentially has been a direct answer to his question. Reference:

Thanks,
Greg

PS: On a side note, I'm curious if I might be barking up the wrong tree with this one. I never knew anyone who had gone through this program

Never forget the aviators who went an extra step to give you useful advice or walked in your resume for that "dream" job.
And I believe that is what the collective JC community is attempting to do - guide the OP to making an informed decision. Regardless if the OP enters into a program at least they will have the perspective of those who have been in the industry longer or have experience in different areas.



Unfortunately, that carrier recently changed over to a part 121 operation which means they had to close down the program. I'm wondering if something like this still exists out there that I can use and if so, where can I find more information about it?
FriendlySkies this is really the part which has not been addressed too much and there is a reason people aren't leading the OP in the direction of KeyLime, Gulfstream or other programs that are psuedo expensive and stir up emotions in people - because they're are viable alternates to a pay-to-right-seat program.
 
I have to agree with Moxie pilot on this one. If the OP did the least bit of searching on this and other forums he would see that these kind of posts are "flame bait". Thats why some of the replies were implying that this had to be a "troll" just to get people riled up.

We are all just trying to help and he has shown that he isn't particularly interested in listening to anyone. And on top of that he seems like a guy who knows/understands very little about his profession of choice. We are all just trying to help. I wish some people had been more harsh/straight-forward to me about things in parts of my life. He should be thankful.
 
We are all just trying to help and he has shown that he isn't particularly interested in listening to anyone. And on top of that he seems like a guy who knows/understands very little about his profession of choice. We are all just trying to help. I wish some people had been more harsh/straight-forward to me about things in parts of my life. He should be thankful.

This is the part that many don't seem to grasp in a certain way: If, once you've given said advice to the OP, and he doesn't want to listen, then he should do as he plans (and is probably already set in). If it works for him, fine. If it doesn't, well then.....he was told so.

But continually hammering the guy in the head isnt going to make a difference. He's going to do whatever it is he's going to do.

I tend to try and worry about what's on my own plate of food. If someone asks for suggestions, Ill give them; but after that, they have to make and live with their own decisions.
 
So what if you disagree with "pay to play" programs, that's your opinion. Look, the third response to his post was, "I don't like you already"...

It hurts everyone else, so in this particular case, I can understand the vocal response. There should probably be a sticky here with rational explanations as to why paying for experience does not help you much, and why paying for a job hurts everyone.

It was a fair question, and deserves a thought out answer.

Here goes:

1) ACTING PIC time is really the only type of flying that most good employers care about. If that's not what your are doing, your are getting something that is not of particular value.

2) Without extremely good knowledge of the systems in the aircraft you are logging time in, even logged time is pretty much less than worthless. It might be great that your buddy let you log 100 hours in a King Air - but in an interview, unless you know the systems in that thing cold, it probably won't help you land a job. You'll definitely get asked about it.

That isn't to say "don't do it" if the opportunity presents itself, but don't think it is going to help you much finding employment.

3) Paying for experience like this is even worse. Not only is the experience not terribly useful for you, you are making it that much harder for someone that is qualified to get that job. Because now they might have to deal with paying for experience too (to compete with you), or in the worst case, you are paying to do a job someone would otherwise be paid for.

4) A simple test. If someone offered you $8/hour to do this flying for the next 10 years - would you? If not, why is it so valuable now?
 
What about the ability to put your feet on the ground around the world for a few days every month. I know layovers are not vacations, but that's one of the big draws for me for those international routes. As for the boring part, I've always figured that I'd counter that with some flying for myself on the side, but then again, I'm a little more coo coo for cocoa puffs about aviation than the average bear.

That's actually why I enjoy long-haul. Flying the jet is pretty boring most of the time (though, I really love the airplane, and enjoy turning off the automation and *flying* whenever possible), but I've been to some pretty neat places. Germany, England, Italy, Greece, Japan, and France come to mind. Also included on the list are about 15-16 other not-so-nice countries, but that's just part of the experience in the supplemental segment of the industry (usually flying around people who are keen on taking long walks on the beach with automatic weapons).

That said, if you end up at a major flying the 777, you're probably going to end up going to the same 5-6 airports over and over. Most guys I talk to who fly widebodies at the major carriers do it for the pay/QOL, not for the international travel.

But, the bottom line is that you enjoy what you're doing overall, and that's all that really matters. The whole different strokes for different folks thing.

Indeed!

Hahaha. As a long haul airline pilot, from my understanding, you are usually there in a layover city for minimum rest, or a zombie due to time changes and trying to re-acclimatize, if you actually try to switch time zones every time. Maybe some of the long haul guys can chime in on that.

First year was like that for me...I was pretty much a zombie. I've gotten much more used to it now, so I can usually bring myself to go out if I'm with a good crew.
 
Back
Top