Roger Roger
Bottom of the list
+1 Internet points for the firefly reference.Some people juggle geese, and it's inappropriate (and illegal, in the literal sense) to throw rocks at them.
+1 Internet points for the firefly reference.Some people juggle geese, and it's inappropriate (and illegal, in the literal sense) to throw rocks at them.
The issue I'm probably going to run into with renting for time is the cost. Even if I am able to find a place who will rent me a twin to do cross countries in, the cost for the same number of hours is going to be somewhere between double and triple the cost of a FO program. The result will be a much longer period of time building than if I am able to find a job or do the FO program. Throwing away $25k might sound like a lot, but throwing away $60k for the same hours is just that much worse.
You're 32! If you were 45, this may be a different discussion. You have lots and lots of time in front of you to fly 777s, if that's what you so desire. Like I said, flying a heavy jet is pretty boring. Lots of time on autopilot watching the miles tick down on the FMS. Talk on the radio sometimes, eat dinner, take a break. Land sometimes. Hell, I really love flying, but man, like MikeD said, the coolest thing I get to do is shoot an approach every once in a while. Maybe with a crosswind, if I'm lucky.
If you get there at 40, you'll have 25 years left of the above. Lots of time.
For being so methodical and thought-out you really haven't done any homework whatsoever. Your blind desire to do this pay-to-play, no matter what those who know better than you say, is proof that you'll do what you want. So, why even ask?
I refuse to help someone who asks for help but has all the answers. But I will say, multi-engine time can be as cheap as your $100/hr pay-to-play scheme. If you want to figure out how, you are surely more than capable.
...I've always figured that I'd counter that with some flying for myself on the side, but then again, I'm a little more coo coo for cocoa puffs about aviation than the average bear.
Hell, I really love flying, but man, like MikeD said, the coolest thing I get to do is shoot an approach every once in a while. Maybe with a crosswind, if I'm lucky.
What about the ability to put your feet on the ground around the world for a few days every month.
I suppose you're right, though such time would be of minimal use, and possibly not loggable (not 100% on the last point, so nobody come at me with claws out!). Pilots need to actually learn their craft, not just go through the motions to build time to meet minimums.
Definitely just need to research and make sure they have an exemption for 61.51 in their opspec. If they do, it is loggable. If not then it isn't. Looking at the FAA's site there are no part 135 cargo companies that have the exemption other than AMF.Granted this is NOT PFT/PFJ depending on the company, the issue comes in when you look at the legalities of logging it. Honestly, 250 hours of some time in the KingAir or the likes isn't worth it. I agree with looking into cross countries and time building like that.
Hahaha. As a long haul airline pilot, from my understanding, you are usually there in a layover city for minimum rest, or a zombie due to time changes and trying to re-acclimatize, if you actually try to switch time zones every time. Maybe some of the long haul guys can chime in on that.What about the ability to put your feet on the ground around the world for a few days every month. I know layovers are not vacations, but that's one of the big draws for me for those international routes. As for the boring part, I've always figured that I'd counter that with some flying for myself on the side, but then again, I'm a little more coo coo for cocoa puffs about aviation than the average bear.
HEY!15 months after getting my Multi com(~300tt), I was flying for a freight company(I think I had 1300tt), and at the time could have gone to a regional instead(but I have self respect).
News flash - in any pilot job you're being paid and will be treated like a bus driver. That's what you are. You're either mowing the sky (survey) flying a tornado (skydivers) flying from point a to b and back (regional).
I disagree, this thread has been pretty civil with the reasons why/why not to enter into a program like this and it essentially has been a direct answer to his question. Reference:It breaks my heart when someone uses this forum for an honest question, and he gets ridicule for asking.
Thanks,
Greg
PS: On a side note, I'm curious if I might be barking up the wrong tree with this one. I never knew anyone who had gone through this program
And I believe that is what the collective JC community is attempting to do - guide the OP to making an informed decision. Regardless if the OP enters into a program at least they will have the perspective of those who have been in the industry longer or have experience in different areas.Never forget the aviators who went an extra step to give you useful advice or walked in your resume for that "dream" job.
FriendlySkies this is really the part which has not been addressed too much and there is a reason people aren't leading the OP in the direction of KeyLime, Gulfstream or other programs that are psuedo expensive and stir up emotions in people - because they're are viable alternates to a pay-to-right-seat program.Unfortunately, that carrier recently changed over to a part 121 operation which means they had to close down the program. I'm wondering if something like this still exists out there that I can use and if so, where can I find more information about it?
We are all just trying to help and he has shown that he isn't particularly interested in listening to anyone. And on top of that he seems like a guy who knows/understands very little about his profession of choice. We are all just trying to help. I wish some people had been more harsh/straight-forward to me about things in parts of my life. He should be thankful.
So what if you disagree with "pay to play" programs, that's your opinion. Look, the third response to his post was, "I don't like you already"...
What about the ability to put your feet on the ground around the world for a few days every month. I know layovers are not vacations, but that's one of the big draws for me for those international routes. As for the boring part, I've always figured that I'd counter that with some flying for myself on the side, but then again, I'm a little more coo coo for cocoa puffs about aviation than the average bear.
But, the bottom line is that you enjoy what you're doing overall, and that's all that really matters. The whole different strokes for different folks thing.
Hahaha. As a long haul airline pilot, from my understanding, you are usually there in a layover city for minimum rest, or a zombie due to time changes and trying to re-acclimatize, if you actually try to switch time zones every time. Maybe some of the long haul guys can chime in on that.