Very common. Not irregular or questionable whatsoever.No, I’d say it’s fairly normal.
However, conversely, I've never heard anyone anywhere ever say, "Let's go out to the Piston."
Very common. Not irregular or questionable whatsoever.No, I’d say it’s fairly normal.
AIM- and, more important, optimally clear/concise lingo: "Passing 4000, climbing 5000", "Passing FL180, descending 11000." Everyone instantly understands the geometry and scope of the situation, and no one confuses "for" for "four", or "to" for "two", or "Oh" for "Zero".What's wrong with that?
Sounds like a point for the next contract negotiation……Start playing these silly games and you really make life harder on yourself. Besides, you aren’t on the clock till you release the brake anyways so you’re going to have to look at it before you’re technically on the clock.
Nah. Just use the company approved ball-gag for the pilot not responsible for the radio.Do we agree on a safeword prior to systems discussion in cruise?
24. NOT recognizing the fact that everything a pilot (or anyone else for that matter) does is douchey to someone!23. Making douchey lists for the internet.
Ok boomereveryone is a fan of their own phraseology, regardless of whether its appropriate or not.
Are there controllers out there that think 211000 is a realistic altitude?AIM- and, more important, optimally clear/concise lingo: "Passing 4000, climbing 5000", "Passing FL180, descending 11000." Everyone instantly understands the geometry and scope of the situation, and no one confuses "for" for "four", or "to" for "two", or "Oh" for "Zero".
Very common. Not irregular or questionable whatsoever.
However, conversely, I've never heard anyone anywhere ever say, "Let's go out to the Piston."
I was taught the same thing at some point, but it's in the AIM to use to and from. 5-3-1 b.2. is an example.
Start playing these silly games and you really make life harder on yourself. Besides, you aren’t on the clock till you release the brake anyways so you’re going to have to look at it before you’re technically on the clock.
hopefully this is something you pulled off of facebook or reddit, because it has zero relevance to 121 airline flying
No it isn’t.
I’ll add guys who wear long sleeve pilot shirts.
Why would that be an issue? I've been wearing work supplied uniforms for a long time, and although I never utilized the long shirt option. It gets hot where I work and I once asked one of the older mechanics (I'm not the oldest mechanic) why he'd choose long sleeves when it was so hot. He told me after a while in the sun his skin would start to itch and one of his parents died from skin cancer, so he did it to protect himself. He's happily retired now with no cancer.No it isn’t.
I’ll add guys who wear long sleeve pilot shirts.
No it isn’t.
I’ll add guys who wear long sleeve pilot shirts.
Short sleeve with tie. Fashion faux pas top 5.
No it isn’t.
I’ll add guys who wear long sleeve pilot shirts.