DCI Pass Benefits

Well, they've already got the Pinnacle guys thinking that way. There's a ton of guys over here that have already said they'll vote "no" on even a stellar TA if we don't get pass benefit improvements.
I respect your opinions on here but i disagree with this one, I dont think it will have that much of a factor as people make it out to be. Especially after S.e's email. By the way he didnt say anything about them talking this week, i hope they are.
 
I respect your opinions on here but i disagree with this one, I dont think it will have that much of a factor as people make it out to be. Especially after S.e's email. By the way he didnt say anything about them talking this week, i hope they are.

I'm just going with the vitrol and uninformed opinions I'm reading over on the company board. Me personally, I'm treating them as different animals. On a P2P conference call right now, so I'll know more in a bit....
 
I'm just going with the vitrol and uninformed opinions I'm reading over on the company board. Me personally, I'm treating them as different animals. On a P2P conference call right now, so I'll know more in a bit....

Well I am voting "no" on a non-pass benefit TA. And I'm distributing my "no" request to as many crews as possible. If I can get 200, I'll be happy.
 
Delta's Plan - Lets piss everyone off, hopefully they will do a slow down and then when their numbers fall below performance levels, we will cancel their contracts and transfer their flying so we can keep costs low all the time.



+1 That's the plan. They want to aggressively park 50 seaters, and will look at any way to disrupt the operations of certain carriers so they can get an early out. Nothing like letting the DCI employees shoot themselves in the foot.
 
+1 That's the plan. They want to aggressively park 50 seaters, and will look at any way to disrupt the operations of certain carriers so they can get an early out. Nothing like letting the DCI employees shoot themselves in the foot.
Well it looks like Pinnacle is the first to take the bait. If Pinnacle pilots were to strike, could Delta use that as an argument to cut them from their contract with DCI or would it take more than that?
 
+1 That's the plan. They want to aggressively park 50 seaters, and will look at any way to disrupt the operations of certain carriers so they can get an early out. Nothing like letting the DCI employees shoot themselves in the foot.


:clap:So nice of them to do that...

I'm sure they won't mind losing passengers when their "one level of service" fails to deliver, too.

:rolleyes:
 
:clap:So nice of them to do that...

I'm sure they won't mind losing passengers when their "one level of service" fails to deliver, too.

:rolleyes:
Im not sure if I like this whole Delta thing, I am a Northwest Guy, I live in a northwest hub so my only option to be home based is delta if i go to the majors. They are the ones who went out and signed 9 regional airline service agreements and now they are trying anything to get out of them. Its quite immature in my opinion.
 
I'm just going with the vitrol and uninformed opinions I'm reading over on the company board. Me personally, I'm treating them as different animals. On a P2P conference call right now, so I'll know more in a bit....


Do share if you don't mind.
 
I'm just going with the vitrol and uninformed opinions I'm reading over on the company board. Me personally, I'm treating them as different animals. On a P2P conference call right now, so I'll know more in a bit....

You multitasker you! Haha. Gotta go to Toronto when I get off this call!
 
:clap:So nice of them to do that...

I'm sure they won't mind losing passengers when their "one level of service" fails to deliver, too.

:rolleyes:

Well, lets see.... mainline is overstaffed and has a bunch od 88s, 73s and DC-9s in the desert. Nope, I don't think that they will lose the lift. I think what you will see is a migration of the outsourced flying returning to mainline.
 
Well, lets see.... mainline is overstaffed and has a bunch od 88s, 73s and DC-9s in the desert. Nope, I don't think that they will lose the lift. I think what you will see is a migration of the outsourced flying returning to mainline.

hah!
 

Sure, why not? Underwing and gate in ATL is already paid mainline rates. DGS can work the outstations for a cheap rate, and DALPA can roll over and give them a B-scale to operate the X-DCI routes on mainline metal, with mainline pilots for DCI rates. Don't think that's possible?
 
Sure, why not? Underwing and gate in ATL is already paid mainline rates. DGS can work the outstations for a cheap rate, and DALPA can roll over and give them a B-scale to operate the X-DCI routes on mainline metal, with mainline pilots for DCI rates. Don't think that's possible?


Any chance the rates return to A scale if they do this?
 
Sure, why not? Underwing and gate in ATL is already paid mainline rates. DGS can work the outstations for a cheap rate, and DALPA can roll over and give them a B-scale to operate the X-DCI routes on mainline metal, with mainline pilots for DCI rates. Don't think that's possible?
In a perfect world that'd be awesome!......but we live in the real world and management won't let that happen. They know that if they were to fold regional flying into mainline fleet; eventually they're going to have to increase the pay rates. They have their B scale that they can keep at a cheap price or get even cheaper.
 
In a perfect world that'd be awesome!......but we live in the real world and management won't let that happen. They know that if they were to fold regional flying into mainline fleet; eventually they're going to have to increase the pay rates. They have their B scale that they can keep at a cheap price or get even cheaper.

While it certainly is a long shot, I wouldn't rule it out completely. I don't think that regional carrier costs will get cheaper. With Congress getting involved in safety, scheduling and training at the regional level, I see costs only going up.

With a desire to reduce domestic lift, Delta is looking to aggressively park 50 seaters and reduce the number of DCI carriers. This makes controlling the quality of the product easier. What better way to gain total control over the product than to bring it all in house. Delta already did it because of customer complaints about call center quality.

It's also not inconcievable for DALPA to agree to fly the planes for a rate equal to, or maybe even slightly cheaper than what they pay for now. As for raising pay in the future, the corporate idea now is that it is preferable to pay a little bit more for quality rather than less for quantity.

But what do I know. It's not like one of my neighbors works in finance for Delta and likes to talk about the "what if" scenarios they constantly run.:dunno:
 
While it certainly is a long shot, I wouldn't rule it out completely. I don't think that regional carrier costs will get cheaper. With Congress getting involved in safety, scheduling and training at the regional level, I see costs only going up.

With a desire to reduce domestic lift, Delta is looking to aggressively park 50 seaters and reduce the number of DCI carriers. This makes controlling the quality of the product easier. What better way to gain total control over the product than to bring it all in house. Delta already did it because of customer complaints about call center quality.

It's also not inconcievable for DALPA to agree to fly the planes for a rate equal to, or maybe even slightly cheaper than what they pay for now. As for raising pay in the future, the corporate idea now is that it is preferable to pay a little bit more for quality rather than less for quantity.

But what do I know. It's not like one of my neighbors works in finance for Delta and likes to talk about the "what if" scenarios they constantly run.:dunno:
Oh I wouldn't doubt it. If you guys can recapture DCI flying at DCI rates, who's rate would DALPA pitch to management? I'm all for it. I can see DALPA reigning in the 76 seat...maybe the 70 seat aircraft but anything under would be retained by the regionals.
<end thread hijack>
 
Well I am voting "no" on a non-pass benefit TA. And I'm distributing my "no" request to as many crews as possible. If I can get 200, I'll be happy.

I personally think that's cutting off our noses to spite our faces. After talking at length to the contract gurus, there's really no way we can put pass benefits in the contract other than what is in there now. The reason there hasn't been a grievance filed on them yet is because they haven't gone into effect yet. I'd expect one to be filed as soon as possible on Monday when they do go into effect. There are already several filled out.

If we had pass benefits such as priority international days and what the mainline partner gives us when it comes to buddy passes, parental travel, etc, I think we'd be the first airline ever to have that in a contract. I'm not saying it's not possible, but I'd also say it's a little unreasonable to throw out a good TA over something that would be groundbreaking from ANY airline standard (not just regionals) if we got it. I'm guessing what's gonna wind up happening is we win the grievances over our pass benefits on Pinnacle aircraft (I doubt an arbitrator with any sense will buy the "Well, TECHNICALLY, it's DELTA charging the fee" BS the company is peddling), and the company will either re-imburse us for the ZED fares, buddy passes, dependent children, etc. In the face of so much $$$ out of the company coffers, THEN they might start pushing for better benefits. Although, I'm STILL looking for hard evidence that Freedom and Shuttle America's Delta benefits are changing on the 23rd as well.

pilotlight said:
They are the ones who went out and signed 9 regional airline service agreements and now they are trying anything to get out of them. Its quite immature in my opinion.

Actually, Delta signed deals with 5 (6 if count XJT, but that's over and done with already). They've been actively trying to get out of the deal with one of those 5 for over a year now. They inherited deals with 3 others through the NWA acquisition. Most, if not all, of these contracts were signed before the economy went in the crapper. I'm sure Delta wanted to spread out their feed to avoid another issue a la Comair back in 2001.

Well it looks like Pinnacle is the first to take the bait. If Pinnacle pilots were to strike, could Delta use that as an argument to cut them from their contract with DCI or would it take more than that?

I'd imagine that's EXACTLY what they'll do. Kind hard to make your A14 goals when your planes aren't flying.

Now, as for what's going on with the pass benefits, there's a couple of things. We've already seen the company threw up their hands and said "There's nothing we can do," but were any of us honestly surprised on that one? Our union's been in touch with the Delta MEC, and from what I heard yesterday, they're going to bat for us with Delta management to try to convince them that this isn't a good idea and will cause division in the Delta brand. Their also trying to get the June 23rd date pushed back, but it doesn't look like that's going to happen.

I think a more productive issue would be looking at our call in honest policy. Once this hits, there WILL be guys missing their commutes to work over the new boarding priority. If you take XJ to work and an XJ guy shows up for the jumpseat followed by a Delta mainline ramper and his family going on vacation taking the rest of the empty seats in the back, you're hosed as a commuter. Second flight rolls around, rinse and repeat. Heck, the way it reads, this could even happen on our OWN flights, although as a CA, if I've got an XJ, Delta, or any other DCI carrier guy and a 9E guy trying to get on the jumpseat, non-rev priority be damned, the 9E guy is going. They don't like it, they can call me into the base manager's office and we'll play the "CA's authority on the jumpseat" game. With the way things currently sit (or will after the 23rd), a policy of "If you miss your first flight, we'll positive space you to work" might work. Might also have the same effect as the grievances when it comes to costing the company $$$.
 
Actually, Delta signed deals with 5 (6 if count XJT, but that's over and done with already). They've been actively trying to get out of the deal with one of those 5 for over a year now. They inherited deals with 3 others through the NWA acquisition. Most, if not all, of these contracts were signed before the economy went in the crapper. I'm sure Delta wanted to spread out their feed to avoid another issue a la Comair back in 2001.

I don't know the time span that he was using but DL also had agreements with Big Sky, TSA, and Atlantic Coast since 2000. Plus if you want to split hairs CHQ and Shuttle America are two different airlines.
 
Okay, got some info on Shuttle America (and I would assume this goes for CHQ guys as well that get Delta benefits):

$50/year
Pilot & family are first on their own aircraft
S3C on mainline
4 parents (no in-laws)
14 buddy passes/year on Republic
Domestic partner
3 international segments/year than ID95

So, differences (which may actually be from OUR management) boarding priority on our own a/c (S3 Travel. Pinnacle employee/spouse/domestic partner/dependent will travel at S3 on Pinnacle operated flights. Delta & NWA employees will travel at S3 on Pinnacle flights. Boarding will be based on seniority with all Delta/NWA/Pinnacle employees mixed in), they still get buddy passes (only on Republic, which means they're actually honoring their CBA), and the international stuff is ID95 after the 3rd segment (which may or may not be the same as "days" on what the company is telling us). Not sure what the difference is on an ID95 and the ZED fare we pay after the 3rd try.

Boarding priority on mainline is the same as we are, but they also get 4 parents where we only get 2. I'm betting this also has to do with their CBA. Looks like minus a few details, the non-wholly owned DCI carriers might be getting hosed together.
 
Look guys, once again. . .

Travel benefits are considered part of your compensation. What % - who knows. Could be 5, 10, 15, or even 20% of your compensation is composed of the "travel benefits."

If they take a portion of your compensation pie away, you better get it replaced with another appropriately sized slice of pie to complete your compensation model.

If your union representatives send you something with a compensation model only comprised of 80% of the model, I certainly hope everyone votes no because you're not only getting screwed by your company, but your union leadership is assisting in the banging.

-------------
Now for pie in the sky dream period
-------------

All of the above matters.

But in reality, I'd much rather NOT have any travel benefits as part of my compensation model. Perhaps offer it as a choice. Company XYZ is honest with their employees and tells them that each individual's travel benefits are 10% of one's compensation. If you don't want the travel benefits, then that's fine, don't take them, and we'll complete your compensation model with 10% increase in wages.

I'd much rather have something tangible that I'll actually be able to spend as opposed to a portion of my compensation that is useless yet the company builds so much value in it. If I needed to go somewhere, I jumpseated. If my wife and I wanted to go somewhere, we purchased tickets. Not like traveling non-rev on Delta is even worth it. Hell, they're trying to charge us our annual travelnet fee to jumpseat on our own aircraft.
 
Back
Top