n57flyguy
Well-Known Member
That would be sweet. Love that engine
What does it give you? Better climb and a few more True? Doesnt the 390 have a lower TBO?
I flew a 73 177B for a while. Fantastic airplane, one of my favorites to this day.
That would be sweet. Love that engine
About the only direct comparison I have is two otherwise identical Glasair Sportsmen 2+2, one with io360 10:1 pistons, another with stock io390. The later one just had more oomph. Torquey in the right places, shorter TO, better climbWhat does it give you? Better climb and a few more True? Doesnt the 390 have a lower TBO?
I flew a 73 177B for a while. Fantastic airplane, one of my favorites to this day.
Interesting. Given the massive weight penalty of the 390 I've always said if I was buying a new 4 cylinder itd be a lycon jug parallel 360 with high compression since those make more power than the 390 and weight 60lbs less and cost 1/4 as much.About the only direct comparison I have is two otherwise identical Glasair Sportsmen 2+2, one with io360 10:1 pistons, another with stock io390. The later one just had more oomph. Torquey in the right places, shorter TO, better climb
Friends had pretty good results with the long piston travel 360s aka io375. Can't confirm or deny, kinda goes against my beliefs of how things should be, but heard good reviews.Interesting. Given the massive weight penalty of the 390 I've always said if I was buying a new 4 cylinder itd be a lycon jug parallel 360 with high compression since those make more power than the 390 and weight 60lbs less and cost 1/4 as much.
Love 177s, but they have quirks....
The shimmy damper is unlike the unit on any other Cessnas. It's extremely easy to destroy by overfilling it. It heats up, goes blooie, and you've showered some neighborhood with parts made from unobtainium.
Carry thru spars are a real trouble spot. They need to be examined for corrosion from the stupid duct they ran through the area.
If I had unlimited money, I'd get a nice 177RG, do the IO-390 STC with the Tornado Alley TN conversion. That'd be a sexy beast.
For the money you'd have into that you can just go get a 210. Pull the power back and match the fuel burn.Minus the Tornado Alley TN conversion part, I juuuuust missed out on the RG with 390 option. The plane in question ended up going to the buyer after all as his insurance wrote off his airplane (hit by a truck). It had a timed out engine, was priced accordingly, and the IO-390 was likely our plan.
Oh well, next time. A group of four of us checking the listings daily...
For the money you'd have into that you can just go get a 210. Pull the power back and match the fuel burn.
If you have unlimited money you don't buy a piston airplane.If you have unlimited money, that's not a concern.
If you have unlimited money you don't buy a piston airplane.
Ok, I can rephrase. If you're looking at C-177s mission profile, but have unlimited money, you buy turbine.Funny, I see a bunch flying in a circle over Reno every year that look quite expensive.
I also see a lot of people pour a TON of money into old cars when new cars are measurably better in every way. That doesn't seem to stop them.
Ok, I can rephrase. If you're looking at C-177s mission profile, but have unlimited money, you buy turbine.
Oh right, I forgot about the awe, glory and mystique of the Cessna 177 Cardinal.Again, you assume that someone looking to do that is only after "the mission".
Oh right, I forgot about the awe, glory and mystique of the Cessna 177 Cardinal.
For the money you'd have into that you can just go get a 210. Pull the power back and match the fuel burn.
Oh right, I forgot about the awe, glory and mystique of the Cessna 177 Cardinal.
How do you like the Cardinal? It’s on my short list but the slow cruise speed gives me pause.
Most pistons aren’t fast enough for a couple knots to matter.
Unless you're looking at one of the bigger engine Mooneys, you're not going to see a 30kt gain over a 177rg.yeah but a M20 is also on the short list so it’s more like 30kts lol