What's this??Any thoughts on the company offering "Enhanced Personal Leave"? Not sure what to make of that.
What's this??
They did that in the summer of 2008 right before....
I know this all sounds great, but I really don't see how it is safely sustainable, especially when accounting for normal attrition. As someone pointed out in another thread we are already starting to see pilots being hired with baggage that would have disqualified them only a year ago. I would not be surprised to see this pressure transfer to training departments to let people slide through who might not have in the past.
They did that in the summer of 2008 right before....
This has nothing to do with hiring. It's pretty simple. They are extremely fat on FOs in CLT right now. So fat that new FOs aren't getting their consolidation time due to a lack of flying to go around. So the company's intent (the way I see it) is to offer a leave of absence in hopes that some senior FOs will take it and free up some lines or at least more flying for the new FOs to get their consolidation time. This alleviates a couple of problems for them. 1) Having to send guys back to the sim prematurely. This not only costs them a little extra money, but sim time itself is valuable right now. 2) Not having to pay some senior FOs for a month will probably save them a few thousand dollars.
That's all I can make of it.
So they are trying to get FOs to take time off for free instead of buying them out of their lines?
I almost enjoy getting displaced nowadays. 4 days of LCR and a 99.9% chance of not getting calledYou don't get bought out of your lines at PSA. Our contract allows you to get sent to long call, not able to be converted to short or airport reserve.
How much baggage we talking here? Cause I'm still slumming it at the same dysfunctional company you recently returned to.
I almost enjoy getting displaced nowadays. 4 days of LCR and a 99.9% chance of not getting called
Well at literally every other airline the trip would disappear from your schedule, they would have to pay you for it, and you could pick up out of open time if you so chose. I'd rather have that than the "they probably won't use me" thing.
They did that in the summer of 2008 right before....
How long have you been there??? I remember the George and John days. You want to talk dysfunctional. Our own gate agents would refuse us the jumpseat.
Or my brother at a regional that I won't name but starts with TSA. Every upgrade candidate failed their first attempt so they had something to talk about on their major interview until the airline lost a lawsuit.
I guess I've just seen some pretty are up operations- 91, 135 and 121- so I have a different perspective of dysfunctional. Working 10-14 days a month, on time almost every leg and seeing my paychecks clear is hardly dysfunctional.
Uh.... noWell at literally every other airline the trip would disappear from your schedule, they would have to pay you for it, and you could pick up out of open time if you so chose. I'd rather have that than the "they probably won't use me" thing.
Well at literally every other airline the trip would disappear from your schedule, they would have to pay you for it, and you could pick up out of open time if you so chose. I'd rather have that than the "they probably won't use me" thing.
Uh.... no
I agree, we did do it that way for a long time then someone looked at the contract...Maybe not, but many airlines do and this should be the standard that other airlines should be shooting for in negotiations.