Dude, you're so cool. So so cool.Hell if I know....I never use it lol
Bringing GA and it's joke safety record to a cockpit near you.Dude, you're so cool. So so cool.
I wanna be just like you
Sarcasm man.... I'm using sarcasmDude, you're so cool. So so cool.
I wanna be just like you
It's quite the opposite. You sound like a moron that learned all the nasty bush techniques that kill a couple dozen people each year.I'm not disputing the fact that it's safer. It does however make you sound like a poor pilot with automation complacency. Sorry....I apologize because I still know how to fly and have not lost my skills yet to automation dependency.
From specifically not putting in the course for the approach?No.... Not a CA at my present employer. Oddly enough no one complains or has an issue with the way I fly the line. I've never had a negative comment at least.... So they may but don't say anything. I've gotten a couple positive compliments.
He probably doesn't walk quite how he talks on the interwebs, or a Captain would have referred him to a CP by now. Unless there's some bookism on his operation that encourages trashing best practices.From specifically not putting in the course for the approach?
No.... Not a CA at my present employer. Oddly enough no one complains or has an issue with the way I fly the line. I've never had a negative comment at least.... So they may but don't say anything. I've gotten a couple positive compliments.
But at a lot of airports if it's visual... I don't use it.
You know what makes you sound like a poor pilot? Approach clearing you to a fix you've never heard of, you have to ask for the phonetic spelling, then ask for a vector towards it because you just got cleared to the final approach fix for a visual at a busy airport and you weren't ready for it because you're treating like a 172.I'm not disputing the fact that it's safer. It does however make you sound like a poor pilot with automation complacency. Sorry....I apologize because I still know how to fly and have not lost my skills yet to automation dependency.
A trained monkey behaving as safely as possible, sure. Troll on..It's always good to be a trained monkey
You don't like it because I'm not the normal?... Because I'm a little cow boyish? Yes...your right.....it's how I live my life in general....I beat my own drums....someone doesn't beat them for me. You can live life as a puppet....or not. It's also why I enjoy hobbies that give me a rush. Anyways....this troll is tired and going to bed.
No....I put the frequency in.... But at a lot of airports if it's visual... I don't use it. The moment the words "cleared visual" are said by atc....I turn the ap off and slap off the FD and look out the window doing the 3 to 1 rule in my head. If it's a busy airport like Atlanta....I may throw the frequency in and use the fms course to intercept the final...then swap over the frequency and use blue needles after disconnecting the AP....just to have the data presented.... That way if we go missed I don't have to swap back over to white needles. There are times I don't do that and fly it raw data or totally visual. I don't use green needles unless it's a legit ILS but thats required to be used obviously.
If you have a way to add a level of safety to your flight, you are not a professional pilot if you don't use it, you are simply a gambler.