"Remember 3407" Airline Labor Reform Act

You've got a foundation to build on if you want to. In addition to the article in the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal did an article about the crash.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124222144768115205.html

Working conditions and pay will get some focus now. Now you need to find a congressional rep who wants some media time (they're all media s so that won't be tough) who has a clue on how to talk about this situation.
 
Just a few questions....

Do those who apply and get hired by airline companies comply and agree with the current the pilot contract as well as agree and comply with these terrible and underpaid working conditions? Yes or No?

Do those who continue to work under the current pilot contract agree and comply to the current pay and working conditions? Yes or No?

Why is this not an issue that cannot be taken up by the pilot unions?

In times like these people really DO NOT care about pilots who are not paid enough. In times like these people are worried about keeping their own job and feeding their own family, let alone some stranger's pay and benefits.
 
Just a few questions....

Do those who apply and get hired by airline companies comply and agree with the current the pilot contract as well as agree and comply with these terrible and underpaid working conditions? Yes or No?

Do those who continue to work under the current pilot contract agree and comply to the current pay and working conditions? Yes or No?

Why is this not an issue that cannot be taken up by the pilot unions?

In times like these people really DO NOT care about pilots who are not paid enough. In times like these people are worried about keeping their own job and feeding their own family, let alone some stranger's pay and benefits.

If we could walk out tomorrow we would (go on strike). Ask me why we can't, and if that's fair?
 
Should people who go from 0 hour to ATP in 90 days

Um...I don't think that's physically possible!:D

Firebird, I'm furloughed, I've got tons of time on my hand, literally 10+ hours a day where I run out of things to do. Let me know if I can put all this free time into helping out. I'm not a regional pilot, I'm a freight dog, but I still want to help out the industry.
 
At the time of the accident, they well exceeded ATP minimums. So what would raising the hour requirement really do? What if she'd buzzed around in a 172 until 2000 hours, gotten hired, and had the 2200 at the time of the crash. Again - hours isn't a great absolute metric in determining crew experience...


I think the point is that if people get hired with an ATP, they would theoretically have a more solid foundation to build 121 experience on. With a more solid foundation, it would be less likely for somebody to make a fundamental mistake when under pressure.

I could be wrong, but didnt the captain have < 400 hrs outside of a 121 cockpit? Hours isnt a "great absolute metric," but I cant think of a better standard to set besides requiring an ATP.
 
You've got a foundation to build on if you want to. In addition to the article in the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal did an article about the crash.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124222144768115205.html

Working conditions and pay will get some focus now. Now you need to find a congressional rep who wants some media time (they're all media s so that won't be tough) who has a clue on how to talk about this situation.

You can't say "Media s"? Wow, I run the website and I didn't even know that one!
 
Exactly. Why can't we get paid more, it's because we don't have enough control over our monetary situation as a group of pilots.

Supply and demand is why you can't get paid anymore. There are too many pilots who are willing to work for poverty wages that are depressing the wages for the rest of the regionalers. Unions can't change that because they aren't all unified, and fight with eachother, and the pilots can't change that because every new guy who comes in is willing to work for beans so he can "pay his dues" (a phrase I absolutely hate in a lot of ways) and then use the regionals as a "stepping stone," to bigger and better things.

No flying job is a stepping stone, and until we start teaching that at the primary level, these things with pay will keep happening. We have too much responsibility for this to be a stepping stone. Be it Cherokee 6 or CRJ-600, people's lives are on the line. I think we all kind of forget our responsibilities when we first get hired simply because of how much fun it is.
 
Yeah, I don't remember adding the word to the filter... Kind of like when people try to get around the profanity filter by typing a$$, which is indeed a violation of the rules. But you can say the word "ass" and it's permissible. Can't call your fellow user an ass, but you back "kick a checkride square in the ass" all day.
 
Yeah, I don't remember adding the word to the filter... Kind of like when people try to get around the profanity filter by typing a$$, which is indeed a violation of the rules. But you can say the word "ass" and it's permissible. Can't call your fellow user an ass, but you back "kick a checkride square in the ass" all day.
d0nkey$ whole:laff:
 
I'm posting this here as well as the thread on the $16,000 a year pilot one on the same subject. Doug, if I've violated a rule on this blog, let me know and I will not do it again.

I'm 57 years old and decided to get back into aviation a year ago and please don't flame me for that. I've been flight instructing so far. I've also been involved in the dental lab field since 1972 and would like to share my experiences there with all of you since they say something about the current economics of the aviation industry. As a dental lab technician I've always taken a fiscal back seat to the dentists that my job basically served. Of course it was the patients that were the final beneficiaries of my services, but it was the dentist that I worked directly with. What set me apart from my dentist clients in the fiscal sense was their professionalism and my lack thereof. Any of you can legally open up a dental lab tomorrow and solicit business in the dental community. In contrast, a dentist must spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in schooling, pass a rigorous state mandated test and either work as an associate of an established dentist or go into business for themselves at a great cost and its attendant risk. What this accomplishes in the economic sense is to limit the number of dentists in the marketplace. As most of you know, this is a mandated by law lowering of the supply of dentists and that, in and of itself, raises the cost of buying the commodity of dental care as it does in any supply/demand/price market. Dentists have political lobbyists that ensure this supply limit stays in place.

Someone on this thread brought up the idea of changing the law (I imagine that would be Part 121) to require all flight crew members to possess an ATP certificate. To me, this would easily accomplish the goals of getting more experienced, well rested crew members into the cockpit and raising the price (wages) of those crew members. It would do so with a single, simple change in the law. As I ponder this, I realize that it is not without its negative results. Ticket prices would have to rise to pay for these more experienced pilots thus lessening demand by passengers for the service. Some airlines would be forced out of the market as a result. More pilots would be involved in the entry level jobs such as instructing, Part 135 operations, etc. for longer periods of time. There would be slower movement within the industry as new pilots gained the required 1500 hours altering the business strategy of the airlines to fill openings due to fluctuations in demand. However, this would allow the market to adjust to the new reality we face in aviation today without ineffective (in my view) solutions like wage controls that some pilots are advocating.

My son JacetheAce (whom I'm very proud of) would have been instructing for his first experience most likely, instead of flying for Piedmont right out of school. However, he would probably be making a lot more money once he landed the airline job and would have a lot less competition, as would we all, in finding said job. This would allow for a stronger pilot's union as well since there would be a lot less pilots out there clamoring for the right to fly for next to nothing in compensation. In short, there would be less of us. But those with the discipline to work the low end jobs at first would have the reward of making a decent living once through to the other side. Ask any medical doctor about residency. They work long, hard hours for low pay (like flight instructing) but have a reward at the end of the tunnel. Aviation has lost its reward for most of its pilots putting too many lives at risk. If the overworked, sleep deprived doctor screws up he only kills one person, but the pilot working under similar conditions can kill a lot more, including themselves as we know all too well.

I'm sorry this is so long. If you've read it all I thank you for your tenacity.
Tim
 
Let's try to keep it on topic here, friends.

I've been on a trip so it's been hard to keep things flowing, but I already have grassroots activists spooling up here and there.

People are already spreading the word all over.

Stan and I will be getting together soon to write some of the core ideology of the movement.

Amber has volunteered to design and administrate a website.

Kristie has volunteered that she may be able to help with the site hosting issues at hand.

I've already received emails at remember.3407@gmail.com talking about people emailing their elected officials.

More to follow, soon.. just as soon as I've caught my breath.
 
Dont get me wrong..Im not trying to be negative to what your aims are.

But the bottom line is this:

This crew F'd up.......badly

MANY professional pilots fly tired. Its part of the job and its just the way it is.
It doesnt excuse someone from putting his/her aircraft in a stall, then make matters worse by making a completely improper "recovery".

IN THIS CASE...The fact that the crew was tired was not the company's fault-- It was a result of their personal negligence that they got themselves into situation where they were up for 30 hours.

The end result is going to be that since no rest regulations were violated by the company. Theere will be no change to any law.

the best that you will see out of this is perhaps more oversight on training and pilot applicant background checking.

You can blame 3407 all you want on low pay, etc. but when it comes down to it..you cant regulate common sense. This crew didnt show much of that.

Sorry to be harsh.
 
Dont get me wrong..Im not trying to be negative to what your aims are.

But the bottom line is this:

This crew F'd up.......badly

MANY professional pilots fly tired. Its part of the job and its just the way it is.
It doesnt excuse someone from putting his/her aircraft in a stall, then make matters worse by making a completely improper "recovery".

IN THIS CASE...The fact that the crew was tired was not the company's fault-- It was a result of their personal negligence that they got themselves into situation where they were up for 30 hours.

The end result is going to be that since no rest regulations were violated by the company. Theere will be no change to any law.

the best that you will see out of this is perhaps more oversight on training and pilot applicant background checking.

You can blame 3407 all you want on low pay, etc. but when it comes down to it..you cant regulate common sense. This crew didnt show much of that.

Sorry to be harsh.
Thank you for sharing your opinion.

Luckily, not many on here feel the same.

Let's be clear: The "aim" as you call it, of Remember 3407 Airline Labor Reform Act will have nothing to do with pay increase. It has everything to do with work rule reform.

I think we will all agree that most airlines, be they mainline or regional, have their own interpretation of the FAR's and abide by them so as not to violate those FAR's.

The problem is, the FAR's, as they are written now, are open to interpretation as to deprive pilots of 8 hours of rest behind the door. Example:


Sec. 121.471 - Flight time limitations and rest requirements: All flight crewmembers.
(a) No certificate holder conducting domestic operations may schedule any flight crewmember and no flight crewmember may accept an assignment for flight time in scheduled air transportation or in other commercial flying if that crewmember's total flight time in all commercial flying will exceed --
(1) 1,000 hours in any calendar year;
(2) 100 hours in any calendar month;
(3) 30 hours in any 7 consecutive days;
(4) 8 hours between required rest periods.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no certificate holder conducting domestic operations may schedule a flight crewmember and no flight crewmember may accept an assignment for flight time during the 24 consecutive hours preceding the scheduled completion of any flight segment without a scheduled rest period during that 24 hours of at least the following:
(1) 9 consecutive hours of rest for less than 8 hours of scheduled flight time.
(2) 10 consecutive hours of rest for 8 or more but less than 9 hours of scheduled flight time.
(3) 11 consecutive hours of rest for 9 or more hours of scheduled flight time.
(c) A certificate holder may schedule a flight crewmember for less than the rest required in paragraph (b) of this section or may reduce a scheduled rest under the following conditions:
(1) A rest required under paragraph (b)(1) of this section may be scheduled for or reduced to a minimum of 8 hours if the flight crewmember is given a rest period of at least 10 hours that must begin no later than 24 hours after the commencement of the reduced rest period.
(2) A rest required under paragraph (b)(2) of this section may be scheduled for or reduced to a minimum of 8 hours if the flight crewmember is given a rest period of at least 11 hours that must begin no later than 24 hours after the commencement of the reduced rest period.
(3) A rest required under paragraph (b)(3) of this section may be scheduled for or reduced to a minimum of 9 hours if the flight crewmember is given a rest period of at least 12 hours that must begin no later than 24 hours after the commencement of the reduced rest period.
(4) No certificate holder may assign, nor may any flight crewmember perform any flight time with the certificate holder unless the flight crewmember has had at least the minimum rest required under this paragraph.

We are not saying that Colgan, or any other regional carrier, violates these rest rules. We are saying that many regional carriers liberally interpret those rules to our detriment as crewmembers.

At my regional, we begin our "rest" period 15 minutes after we set the brake.

That does not allow for:
1. Waiting for the van;
2. The drive to the hotel;
3. Checking into the hotel;
4. Getting into the room.

Then, our rest ends 40 minutes before departure.

Many, many times, we end up with an average of 6 hours of rest behind the door.

The FAR's, as stated above, can be easily amended by stating as follows:


(1) 9 consecutive hours of rest [BEHIND THE DOOR/AT A HOTEL] for less than 8 hours of scheduled flight time.
(2) 10 consecutive hours of rest [BEHIND THE DOOR/AT A HOTEL] for 8 or more but less than 9 hours of scheduled flight time. (3) 11 consecutive hours of rest [BEHIND THE DOOR/AT A HOTEL] for 9 or more hours of scheduled flight time.

AND


(1) A rest required under paragraph (b)(1) of this section may be scheduled for or reduced to a minimum of 8 hours if the flight crewmember is given a rest period of at least 10 hours [BEHIND THE DOOR/AT A HOTEL]that must begin no later than 24 hours after the commencement of the reduced rest period.
(2) A rest required under paragraph (b)(2) of this section may be scheduled for or reduced to a minimum of 8 hours if the flight crewmember is given a rest period of at least 11 hours [BEHIND THE DOOR/AT A HOTEL]that must begin no later than 24 hours after the commencement of the reduced rest period. (3) A rest required under paragraph (b)(3) of this section may be scheduled for or reduced to a minimum of 9 hours if the flight crewmember is given a rest period of at least 12 hours [BEHIND THE DOOR/AT A HOTEL]that must begin no later than 24 hours after the commencement of the reduced rest period.

Some carriers (American Airlines) already have that in their contract.

However, our safety, and that of our passengers, absolutely should NOT lay in the hands of schedulers who, while not violating the FARS as they are written , still liberally interpret those FAR's to get their on-time departures.

"Remember 3407" Airline Labor Reform Act is dedicated to changing the Regulations, so as to protect crews and the flying public from fatigued pilots.
 
Back
Top