Vietnam B789 at Munich on Aug 15th 2026, late rotation, tailstrike, runway overrun, tyre damage

how overweight, or reduced thrust, or both, does a 787 have to be, to not be able to lift off of a 13,100+ foot runway? I wouldn’t think it would be a config error, as that would give an instant warning. The last jet i saw using significant amounts of runway like that, nearly 10,000 feet, were fully loaded A-model KC-135 tankers.
Water injection for the win.
 
Imagine trying to turn every thread you post in into a "poor me I'm a major airline captain" conversation.
Nah more like it’s weird I work with people that don’t understand how brake energy works. Or that there aren’t any gates when you arrive in Seattle.

It’s really not hard but like someone said “life is harder when you’re stupid.”
 
“life is harder when you’re stupid.”

1787201342241.png


You should take ur own advice
 
I’m in there somewhere asking about a interview 7 years ago with DL 🤣 don’t worry I didn’t take it personal

Btw new Boeing doc on Netflix was good…

Is there a new Boeing doc, or is this just the old one from a couple years ago?
 
Not to interrupt the tradition of rampant speculation and punching down on aviation incidents occurring at the hands of aviators deemed “less than”…But preliminary info has been released.

-According to the captain, two instances of momentary uncommanded power reduction, once prior to V1, and again past V1. Maximum power was applied to get the plane off the ground.


Not saying an incident captain’s immediate recollection of the incident takes precedent over the preliminary, but certainly a different tune than “south Asian flight crew forgets parking brake.”
 
Not to interrupt the tradition of rampant speculation and punching down on aviation incidents occurring at the hands of aviators deemed “less than”…But preliminary info has been released.

-According to the captain, two instances of momentary uncommanded power reduction, once prior to V1, and again past V1. Maximum power was applied to get the plane off the ground.


Not saying an incident captain’s immediate recollection of the incident takes precedent over the preliminary, but certainly a different tune than “south Asian flight crew forgets parking brake.”



Are we reading the same thing? Speed stopped increasing for 2 seconds it says.


Windy/gusty day can cause the speed indication to hang for 2 seconds before increasing again. Not sure this is some a ha! moment.
 
Not to interrupt the tradition of rampant speculation and punching down on aviation incidents occurring at the hands of aviators deemed “less than”…But preliminary info has been released.

-According to the captain, two instances of momentary uncommanded power reduction, once prior to V1, and again past V1. Maximum power was applied to get the plane off the ground.


Not saying an incident captain’s immediate recollection of the incident takes precedent over the preliminary, but certainly a different tune than “south Asian flight crew forgets parking brake.”

Not sure if you are seeing a different source, but what you posted doesn't mention a power reduction, but rather a speed reduction. Two very different things.
 
So I've been out of the big-plane game for a while now (11+ years?!? That long?!? Oye!) but I guess most of the big jet operators don't have any sort of acceleration check or similar? Back in the day (apparently WAY back in the day) if Freddy was heavy enough (or runway short enough) and we had to do a standing take-off, we would calculate a acceleration check. Basically after XX seconds after brake release you needed to be at XXX airspeed or well, RTO.

This was used in addition to the normal V1/V2 and all, but a good way to make sure you were going fast enough. I know this was the way with the legacy (TF-39) jets but I don't remember if it carried over the the CF6s.
 
Back
Top