Well, he is and he isn't.Boris is right on this. There is the letter of the law and then their is the real world application of it.
Yes, there's "real world" (illegal) vs "letter of the law" (legal). Where I think he's wrong is where it needs to be changed.
The feds aren't going to make a whole bunch of changes unless it becomes a safety issue. The problem is, if you start bending metal, they'll still just slap the company and suspend your ticket.....and you still get to lose your job.
Where it needs to changes is from the ground up! If people would stop putting up with this crap just "to have a job", then the companies couldn't survive on it. The weak ones that depend on it would go out of business and the strong ones would get stronger and hire more pilots.
Take a look at any GoJet thread on here. Pilots are expected to not take the job there because every 21 year old out of college at a regional is an expert on "alter egos" and wants everyone to stand up for their principles! Don't take a job at Gojet just to have a job! Well, hell folks.......I'm not interested in your 121 side of things (at this time) but I am certainly interested in improving my QOL on the 135 side! (Don't get me wrong, improving things for 121 pilots will help improve things for everyone.....but in the end, like everyone, I'm lookin out for #1.) So yes, I do expect people to not take jobs where rest is being violated all the time! I did it! It probably set me back a few years in my career, but I wasn't going to allow someone to make me their B like that. I wasn't going to allow them to ignore the regulations because they couldn't afford to follow them (the real issue).
I also find it kind of weird that we expect people working at a non-union carrier to absolutely refuse (even at the cost of a job) to fly "struck work"
My question if the rest interpretation (directly from the FAA) is being ignored is "what else are they just ignoring?"
Maintenance? Weather mins? Training? Charts? Clean wing/aircraft concept/deicing?
-mini