ppragman
FLIPY FLAPS!
A god damn men
The part you circled is subordinate to F4
A god damn men
Exactly.. so you’d fly an out of the way procedure if all ok.
But lose an engine and go straight out??
You’re just LAUGHABLE.
the * you talking about?The part you circled is subordinate to F4
First off, dumbass, I fly for Mesa. That’s been clearly stated numerous times.
Next, “the flight crew may accept an IFR clearance containing a takeoff and climb in VFR conditions out to a specifed point in the clearance...”that’s from our OpsSpecs.
So let me help you off your high-horse.
And here’s a little secret for you. I said 50%. NO ONE..I repeat, NO ONE, flies through ODP.
So stick that in your pipe.
No he wasn't wrong. You just have the reading comprehension of a toddler. How do you fly an airplane with this terrible of a comprehension of the regs?So... you just admitted you were wrong this whole time.
Great! Trust me, I'm laughing.
Secondly... I'm a dumbass for working for Mesa?? Please explain why.
The SUPERPILOTS of... what? SkyWest? Envoy? They're so much better??? Why?? PLEASE EXPLAIN.
C'mon... tell me.
Yes, we've been saying over and over again that's an option that complies with the regs. Even the regs says that. We mentioned that being a possibility, but since we can't possibly know what your ops specs are since they are carrier specific, we moved on since you didn't seem to know them either. Which brings me to - what on earth are they teaching in ground school these days?I just quoted the • OpsSpecs that says we don’t have to.
Maybe YOU have the reading comprehension of a toddler.
I’d like to point out that unless you actually receive a climb VFR clearance you cannot as a 121/135 use a VFR climb.Yes, we've been saying over and over again that's an option that complies with the regs. Even the regs says that. We mentioned that being a possibility, but since we can't possibly know what your ops specs are, we moved on since you didn't seem to know them either.
and it's been mentioned ad NASEUM that it's possible. YOU dopes have the reading comprehension of TODDLERS.Yes, we've been saying over and over again that's an option that complies with the regs. Even the regs says that. We mentioned that being a possibility, but since we can't possibly know what your ops specs are since they are carrier specific, we moved on since you didn't seem to know them either. Which brings me to - what on earth are they teaching in ground school these days?
And you wonder why prags was making fun of Mesa...and it's been mentioned ad NASEUM that it's possible. YOU dopes have the reading comprehension of TODDLERS.
Ground school??> You want to know the truth?
They teach NOTHING about this.. Got it?? NOTHING. I'm not exaggerating. NOThING. Not even mentioned.
Hell, until this past AQP I didn't even know it was not ok to set the flaps to take-off setting before de-icing. It was news to me we can only do flaps-45 or flaps-0
CANPA approaches? You know about these?? I didn't know until a recent line check that we're supposed to put in the intermediate fix for this predictive monitoring BS.. Why not just dive and drive? makes it so much easier?
this was NEVER COVERED IN TRAINING.
yes I do... Please explain.And you wonder why prags was making fun of Mesa...
I mean, their training sounds like it has some pretty big holes.yes I do... Please explain.
C'mon.. TOUGH GUY.. C'non.
Tell me when you understand how aviation works so I feel safer in the skies. Until then,, I’m certainly avoiding Alaska since you admitted to working there.Tell me when you get on at mainline so I know when to start taking trains.
Tell me when you understand how aviation works so I feel safer in the skies
And I’ve proven you wrong with examples and OpsSpecs and yet you continue your crusade. A check airmen finally chimed in via email and said “ODP are absolutely not required.”A bunch of us have been doing this for most of this thread.