The Flying Turkey a CFI?

[ QUOTE ]
As for E7B, man you're just a joke! Are you actually a pilot? Try pulling 6.6Gs in your PA28 and see what happens, another nominee for the Darwin Award.

[/ QUOTE ]

Instigation eh? Did I say I was stupid enough to try and pull 6.6 in an Archer. Let's at least read what people are saying.

The Archer comes out of the Piper factory rated at 3.8 (4.4 below 2138) plus a 50% safety buffer for 5.7 and 6.6. That's a fact. Another fact is I won't be purposely come close to pushing these limits.

A well trained Private will have learned the dangers of uncoordinated flight while low to the ground. Learned at a safe atlitude and far within rated limitations.
 
i highly doubt Turk's instructor took the aircraft into an inverted flight attitude. just as someone mentioned earlier, it was probably just an extreme pitch down attitude and not a complete inversion. i bet Panam would have that instructors butt if they had truly put the plane belly up. Turk, please tell us that didn't happen.

i remeber some dumb-ass private student that was at Panam when i was finishing my comm. who took an Archer out solo and did a couple rolls with it and actually took pictures while upside down. i didn't know him personally but i understand he wasn't the swiftest of human beings.
 
I belive I had the same instructor as Turk. The cross control stall that I was taught, was nothing more than a quick roll and recover. Infact for my CFI checkride, I demonstrated this as I was taught, and the examiner approved of my induction and recovery from the stall. There was no mord substantial increase of G's than there would be with a recovery from a power off stall. The way turk is being taught is fine in my book and certainly not inverted flight.
 
When aircraft are certified, they are able to take 3.8G for normal, 4.4 for utility and 6 G for aerobatic. The 50% 'safety' margin you mention is the point at which failure is allowed to occur. So...If you do 3.8G in a normal category aircraft, you can pull this as many times as you want with no damage. If you pull more than this permanent deformation can occur, as well as metal fatigue. You can pull rivets and wrinkle the wings, or bend the spars. If you really go for the max and pull the numbers you stated and the aircraft holds together, it would probably be scrap.

The other problem is that Pipers are not certified for spins. They have been tested and found able to do a 2 turn or so many seconds of spin (not sure, it's been awhile) and recover. That is it. So, if you do put it into a spin and let it go, recovery may be in doubt.

I think the maneuver probably seemed worse than it was. I doubt that the structural limits were even close to exceeded. That being said, I would not let this happen in a Piper. There are alot of things a student can do to kill you. We do not have to actually go out and try them all for ourselves to be a good CFI. Go do this maneuver in a twin or an aircraft with tip tanks and you may not live to write about it here. It is the CFI's job to know the limits and make sure they are not exceeded.
 
[ QUOTE ]
When aircraft are certified, they are able to take 3.8G for normal, 4.4 for utility and 6 G for aerobatic. The 50% 'safety' margin you mention is the point at which failure is allowed to

[/ QUOTE ]

Speaking strictly from an aerodynamic standpoint, you could take a 182 and barrel roll the thing with no problem, provided it was done correctly, and the Gs were kept within limits. Most pilots, however, can't do the maneuvers correctly (G it up while dishing out the barrel at the bottom), but it can be done with no dmamge to the plane.

Now, can it be done? Yes. It is necessarily smart to do it (especially with no aero training)? No.
 
Before anyone says, "Oh yeah, I did it in flight sim! I can do it in real life!"...

MS Flight Simulator doesn't consider the effect of gravity (or lack thereof) on fuel and oil systems.

I did some light aerobatics in a T-34B and I don't know what's worse, the manuever itself or recovering from the manuever with a nasty case of "spatial d".
 
I've been in a few "click the meter" events before in the S-3, which means it was 5+ G's. Mx Control used to tell the pilots how much they overstressed the jet, but they felt like it was getting competitive, which is total BS. NOBODY wanted to overstress those jets...you get your @zz chewed out by the MO. Had one pilot in our squadron that overstressed a few times in one month. He was sent to the hangar bay to do the grunt work on the inspection. He never (while I was still in the squadron) overstressed again. Almost always happened during the break, or while flathatting.

Chunk
 
Doug, I think (but cannot prove) that many good CFIs demo at least a cross-controlled stall to their students. I specifically requested some spin training since, like you, I felt that a spin in is much more common than a straight-ahead stall. We made quite sure we were within the utility cat., and then went up and did some 1 turn spins.

There is a whole world of flying that many pilots never encounter.

[ QUOTE ]
I can't remember if it was part of my syllabus when I was training at ERAU, but I'd show my private students a cross control stall late in their training.

Not beacuse it was required, but I think thats one of the most likely scenarios. I'd rather my students see it with the presence of a CFI rather than inadvertently on base to final.

I always thought the basic stall demonstration was highly unrealistic without a climb, turn or other manuever to simulate a phase of flight.

But, alas, that's just my own personal opinion.

[/ QUOTE ]
 
The cross controlled stall is something that should be demonstrated to students. If you have an aircraft approved for spins, these should also be taught. I would only do spins when someone was comfortable in the aircraft and was close to their private. Since the only aircraft I fly are all Pipers that are not approved for spins, I am unable to do them with my students. Since they still get spin training in another aircraft, that is ok.

I still would not let a Piper Cherokee/Arrow spin intentionally. They are not certified for this and I am not a test pilot. If you think it is ok to do maneuvers that your aircraft is not certified for, you may not live to regret your mistake. Sometimes stuff we didn't expect happens and you deal with it and go on. I think what happened in the Turks lesson was a mistake. It does not mean he has a bad instructor or Pan Am is a bad school.
 
[ QUOTE ]
i remeber some dumb-ass private student that was at Panam when i was finishing my comm. who took an Archer out solo and did a couple rolls with it and actually took pictures while upside down. i didn't know him personally but i understand he wasn't the swiftest of human beings.

[/ QUOTE ]

You would be correct in your assessment of him. I did know him personally, and he most certainly did not belong in the cockpit of an airplane. And I saw the pics of his flight too....YEESH!! I'm glad that he dropped out before he finished his PPL so he won't be terrorizing the NAS!!
 
[ QUOTE ]
I can't remember if it was part of my syllabus when I was training at ERAU, but I'd show my private students a cross control stall late in their training.

Not beacuse it was required, but I think thats one of the most likely scenarios. I'd rather my students see it with the presence of a CFI rather than inadvertently on base to final.

[/ QUOTE ]

Excellent point. IMHO I think every student pilot should have x-controlled stalls “demonstrated” to them.

Which is better: Telling your student not to get uncoordinated in the pattern. The way I was taught when turning base to final and over-using the rudder was, “Don’t do that”. Or to have the maneuver demonstrated. When I finally saw one and felt the wing and nose drop (along with the altitude), I thought, so that’s why he said “Don’t do that”.
 
Holy cow, I didn't think my post would stir up such a debate. Let me clear things up a little.
1. We were at a safe altitude 5,500 ft
2. we performed the maneuver simulating base to final turn, and overshooting final, using a road as the runway.
3. My instructor banked left, applied left rudder, the left wing dropped, he then abruptly and simultaineously moved the yoke to the right and back, while holding the rudder left.
4. The airplane immediately pitched nose down, and rolled left. All I saw was ground until he pulled out of the dive.

So we weren't flying inverted and level, or doing rolls or loop's. The airplane just kind of rolled over while descending. I would say during the recovery we pulled 2 maybe 2 1/2 G's. We never exceded Vle (129kts) because the gear was down.

The Turk.
 
Today was SPIN training.
What a blast! I was very nervous about doing spins, after all, all the books you read say spins are dangerous, and we always hear about some poor student pilot who "spun in". So up we went in the Cessna 152 Aerobat to 4500 ft. My instructor did the first 2 spins, one to the left and one to the right. The spin entry is very smooth and somewhat gentle, but once the spin starts, it seems to increase in speed with each revolution. So after 3 spins he recovered, and thats when it hit me...I was super dizzy. We climed back up and did it again, and once again I was really dizzy after the recovery, but it wasn't as bad as the first one. It spins so fast that the view out the windshield is almost nothing but a blur. We were over the ocean, maybe a mile off shore, so I headed West, using the contrast of the blue water, and dry land, to count the spins. Every time I saw land at the top of the windshield, that was one spin.

So it was my turn, throttle to 1400 rpm, pitch up, stall horn, right full rudder, and over we went. Then it was... water..ground..1 water..ground..2 water...ground...3 now its time to recover. Throttle to idle, and in the C152 all you do is release the rudder pressure and the spin stops. Now were in a dive, so pull back on the yoke to gently recover from the dive. I was a little dizzy during the recovery. We climbed up and I did it again, the other direction, and this time I didn't get dizzy, I guess I got used to it. By this time I was having fun doing the spins, and could have done it a few more times, but the lesson was over so we headed back.

Now maybe my cross controlled stalls will be better!

The Turk.
 
If all you're doing is releasing the pro-spin inputs, you're not getting the full experience. I initially did spins in a 152, later in a Zlin 242. It's a WHOLE DIFFERENT DEAL! If you're interested in learning proper spin recovery, you have to get out of the 152. Go out on your own and find a Decathlon, Pitts, or whatever and a CFI that does spin training. It'll open your eyes, lemme tell ya.

Chunk

***This is in no way a Pan Am bash, so all you folks out there waiting to be offended, I don't wanna hear it***
 
OK folks, here is the explenation of cross control stalls from my CFI...

"OK everyone, here's the skinny on cross-control stalls at Pan-Am. They
are entered just as the Airplane Flying Handbook describes, using the
scenario of an overshoot of base to final. The local FSDO, Orlando, who
are EXTREMELY safety conscious, like the stall to come to a full break
and roll, which comes without much warning, hence one reason for the
demo. It is indeed an insipient spin, but not a full spin. We don't get
there. We recognize what is happening and recover. It is not a spin
demo.
The Cherokee series can insip all day. Will I let it get more than once
around? NO! Also bear in mind, a spin is a ONE G maneuver, the plane
does
not get overly stressed. I've felt as pressed in my seat at 50 and 60
degrees of bank. We smoothly recover before Vle with Va in mind. If you
start at 5500 agl, you're recovered by 4500 agl. It's just that the
first
time one sees this full stall, it's a little unsettling. But the point
is
to demonstrate what can happen to a panicy, knee-jerk reactionary
student
(or one who's not so panicky) as he cheats the turn to final with a
heavy
foot on the rudder (yaw = roll) In addition to the abruptness of
control
input, power left in during the maneuver also has a little to do with
how
surprised you might get. Do you need to show it to all strudents? No.
Should you? Not necessarily. Should a CFI experience it? Yes. Should
you
discuss it? At the very least to everyone. Those of you with hundreds,
if
not thousands, of dual given have probably experienced things you
didn't
think a student could do. One relatively new CFI at Pan Am had a
student
who consistantly was overbanking, and heavy with the rudder at low
altitude. No amount of "wrist slapping" (figurative) could correct this
bad habit. The CFI brought the student to a safe altitude, and basicaly
said, "This is what you're doing and why you're scaring me..." The
student became a believer, makes nice square patterns, and if he's not
quite aligned, he doesn't rush it and goes around if he can't get set
up
with minimal inputs. The FSDO has been VERY pleased with our CFIs
demonstrating the stall to a full break and roll. In fact, on a number
of
occasions, my students have come back from a check ride saying that the
FAA Inspector wished more CFI candidates would demo the stall as we do.
Now, every cross-control stall is not demo'd to full break -- often we
bring it to a buffet and hold it there, on the brink of a roll. If
asked
by an inspector to demo the stall, I have the student ask the inspector
if he has a preference as to how far to bring it -- one likes 360
degrees
of buffet before recovery, one likes recovery at first buffet, most
like
the full break. I've said enough, I'm done. Flying Turkey's CFI."
 
I do a little bashing of PanAm, but in good fun and not directed at anyboyd.

For the price all ya'll are paying, you think PanAm would have the decency of giving you a different airplane to do spins in. In my opinion, the school should be able to afford a better aircraft for spinning, like a super decathalon. I know they are trying to teach you guys the basics, but they could do so in a higher powered aircraft that is actually meant for doing some real aerobatics (yes I know the aerobat is meant for aerobatics).
 
First:
[ QUOTE ]
I do a little bashing of PanAm, but in good fun and not directed at anyboyd.

[/ QUOTE ]
Bashing is never done in good fun--otherwise it isn't bashing.

Onto your actual point: [ QUOTE ]
For the price all ya'll are paying, you think PanAm would have the decency of giving you a different airplane to do spins in. In my opinion, the school should be able to afford a better aircraft for spinning, like a super decathalon. I know they are trying to teach you guys the basics, but they could do so in a higher powered aircraft that is actually meant for doing some real aerobatics (yes I know the aerobat is meant for aerobatics).

[/ QUOTE ]

Training in an aerobatic aircraft is extremely useful. My CFI has a Zlin, and we'll be doing some upset training in that, as well as some basic aerobatics.

However, one should learn the stall and incipient spin in the aircraft they will fly most frequently. The stall characteristics of Cessnas and Pipers are not the same as the aerobatic aircraft. Remember, one is trying to simulate what could happen when inattention gets the upper hand. That means you'll be trundling along in the pattern in your usual spam can. (It never is a ho-hum day at the office at the controls of a Decathalon.)
 
We have a 152 to do official spin training in.

After reading what I wrote maybe I should clarify what I meant. I am not advocating intentionally doing aerobatic maneuvers in the Archer/Arrow/Seminole. However, when teaching instructors, and only instructors, I will show them stuff that can happen to them with students that are not being careful. Without even knowing Turks instructor I demonstrate the same thing, which basically shows what will happen if the student stalls, panics, and attempts to pick up the dropping wing with the yoke. Now, very infrequently, like only twice in over two years of instructing has the airplane gotten away from what I expected. Both times with during power-on stalls, and both were when I was demonstrating trying to pick up the dropping wing with the yoke. Yeah, it wasn't pretty, but the recovery was straight forward and no way did I ever exceed 2.0g or any airspeed limitations. So I guess my point is that in training you push the limits and every once in awhile it's going to bite you a little bit. Does that mean that we should stop teaching this stuff? I don't think so and neither does the FAA.

As far as the crack about getting hired in 800 hours, grow up. At every school there are people that stick around for whatever reasons. Where to you think chief pilots, check instructors, two year cfis...ect. come from? Quite a few people are getting hired from Pan Am, however, I did not do their program, and I have zero interest in going to the airlines, so I am not terrible disappointed that I am still instructing.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Sometimes stuff we didn't expect happens and you deal with it and go on. I think what happened in the Turks lesson was a mistake. It does not mean he has a bad instructor or Pan Am is a bad school.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks. That sums up what I was saying. It's a moot point now, turns out Turk never went aerobatic after all.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I do a little bashing of PanAm, but in good fun and not directed at anyboyd.

[/ QUOTE ]

Please give me the name of your work place so I can bash it "in good fun". And to think you guys think that people make serious decisions based of the stuff they read here.
 
Back
Top