Reno race crash in front of grandstands

I just watched the new video on MSNBC and Its sickening to be honest. I had friends sitting at the far end of that box and I was supposed to be there with them. They were okay but Said that the scene was awful. I am glad I was not there in person to witness it.

While the deaths were bad enough, many of the injuries were pretty horrendous from what I've heard from Fire/EMS workers present and from photos. An instant Mass Casualty event if there ever was one, akin to a bombing.
 
So, since RARA had a Mass Casualty exercise just before the accident happened...where are the people crying "CONSPIRACY!"?

(ref the UAL 93 thread....)
 
Would depend on how long the structure was feeling it.....any longer than it was in this case or beyond instantaneous, and that very well could've been a possibility, along with the empennage or fuselage.
What I'm really saying is 22G sounds high to me.
 
So, since RARA had a Mass Casualty exercise just before the accident happened...where are the people crying "CONSPIRACY!"?

(ref the UAL 93 thread....)

Not to mention you can't see any large pieces of plane (engine, empennage, etc), so it must have been a missile.
 
I met two of the victims this summer, They were proud owners of a Navion and flew to Wyoming for a navion fly-in. Very nice people. Him and his wife both died together at Reno.
 
I just watched the new video on MSNBC and Its sickening to be honest. I had friends sitting at the far end of that box and I was supposed to be there with them. They were okay but Said that the scene was awful. I am glad I was not there in person to witness it.

I was just with another p-51 team in FL last month, good friends of the beagle's girlfriend. Didn't want to comment until we knew they were okay. What I've heard was not happy
 
I'm with Frank - 22 g seems high to me for the airplane to still be intact. I'll defer to the experts Mike and Hacker - but that number seems out of whack. Wild guess but I think a stock P-51 weighs around 7,500lbs empty with around a 4,000lb useful load. I'm guessing that airplane probably raced at 8,500 or so pounds (wild ass guess - fuel, the unique radiator, but less 10 feet of wing) so 22g is around 187k lbs. What was done to lighten that airplane I wonder - the original guys in that owned it in the late 40's called North American for a list of stuff they could remove for weight - so I'm thinking a lighter machine might fail sooner (based on lightening changes)? The 22g number just seems out of whack to me - but again, that is just a hunch.
 
I'm with Frank - 22 g seems high to me for the airplane to still be intact. I'll defer to the experts Mike and Hacker - but that number seems out of whack. Wild guess but I think a stock P-51 weighs around 7,500lbs empty with around a 4,000lb useful load. I'm guessing that airplane probably raced at 8,500 or so pounds (wild ass guess - fuel, the unique radiator, but less 10 feet of wing) so 22g is around 187k lbs. What was done to lighten that airplane I wonder - the original guys in that owned it in the late 40's called North American for a list of stuff they could remove for weight - so I'm thinking a lighter machine might fail sooner (based on lightening changes)? The 22g number just seems out of whack to me - but again, that is just a hunch.

When talking an instantaneous "spike" of G-loading or G onset, not sustained Gs, that number is normally fairly high. In this case, 22 specifically may or may not be accurate depending on a number of factors which the structures personnel on the investigating team would be obviously looking into. I can't say either way, as stranger things have happened, depending on how the load is felt by the airframe, in which particular directions, against which particular parts, which have or don't have reinforcements, etc, etc, etc. Because Im not privy to the investigation facts, I don't count or discount anything at this stage of the game. All evidence has to be examined, crosschecked, etc.
 
When talking an instantaneous "spike" of G-loading or G onset, not sustained Gs, that number is normally fairly high. In this case, 22 specifically may or may not be accurate depending on a number of factors which the structures personnel on the investigating team would be obviously looking into. I can't say either way, as stranger things have happened, depending on how the load is felt by the airframe, in which particular directions, against which particular parts, which have or don't have reinforcements, etc, etc, etc; and because Im not privy to the investigation facts. That's why I don't count or discount anything at this stage of the game. All evidence has to be examined, crosschecked, etc.

Fascinating stuff. Thanks for that info. I would wonder if the tab could have done that, or if something more major caused it and the tab ripped off as part of a larger failure? I know about Voodoo Chile but that just seems amazing that a tab coming of the stab could render the airplane completely uncontrolable.
 
I just watched the new video on MSNBC and Its sickening to be honest. I had friends sitting at the far end of that box and I was supposed to be there with them. They were okay but Said that the scene was awful. I am glad I was not there in person to witness it.
Jesus Christ. That is about the single scariest piece of footage I've ever seen.
 
Fascinating stuff. Thanks for that info. I would wonder if the tab could have done that, or if something more major caused it and the tab ripped off as part of a larger failure? I know about Voodoo Chile but that just seems amazing that a tab coming of the stab could render the airplane completely uncontrolable.

As in causing the pitch-up? Possibly. Anything is possible. If that tab was doing some hard work in keeping nose-down trim at the speeds he was running at, then departed the airframe, where would those now-untrimmed elevator loads be transferred to and what direction would they go?
 
As in causing the pitch-up? Possibly. Anything is possible. If that tab was doing some hard work in keeping nose-down trim at the speeds he was running at, then departed the airframe, where would those now-untrimmed elevator loads be transferred to and what direction would they go?

Yeah...probably a little different than a Cub. Just hard to get my brain around the kind of speeds and forces that are at work here. The ailerons were cut down significantly - wonder how extreme the stick forces in that machine were.
 
When it involves somebody you know who had a huge passion for aviation, it sure hurts...


2011 Hewitt Efficiency.jpg
 
So, since RARA had a Mass Casualty exercise just before the accident happened...where are the people crying "CONSPIRACY!"?

(ref the UAL 93 thread....)

I've got no Class to speak of, so I won't suggest that it's Classless to somehow equate people asking questions about huge political events with (imaginary) people wearing tin helmets in a totally (*until now!) unrelated thread, but I do think it's sort of pointless.
 
I've got no Class to speak of, so I won't suggest that it's Classless to somehow equate people asking questions about huge political events with (imaginary) people wearing tin helmets in a totally (*until now!) unrelated thread, but I do think it's sort of pointless.
Eh, I thought it was pretty funny.
 
Even half or less of that, especially instantaneously, would be a pretty quick GLOC.

If the pilot wasn't expecting and sitting properly for a G load that high, isn't it possible he could have broken his neck too. I have a friend that flies F-16's and said one of the guys in his unit did a rapid pitch up at the end of the runway showing off for his family and severly damages his neck as he wasn't seated correclty for it.


On another note, I agree that the General Media does a piss poor job at reporting anything aviation releated. Their so called experts are normally the first idiot to call the station has a PPL or saw the cockpit once of an airliner.

My thoughts and prayers are with those killed and injured and emergency people that had to respond to this.
 
Back
Top