Correct. I have ridden on both e-175 and 737 second js before. One is far worse than the other.It was an E-175
Sounds like an Auburn Calloway part 2, minus the physical attack.
A little off topic, but last year I had an Uber ride to MEM from the hotel. Driver was a FedEx manager who’s sister dated him around that time.
Probably the most interesting van ride I’ve ever had.
Now that would’ve been some interesting conversation on that ride! Talk about a small world…
That is a • load of attempted murder charges.Publicly available information has listed this as the person:
disasterSo, hypothetically, if cockpit jumpseating was ever placed on hold or worse, but jumpseaters could still go sit in the back, would that still be a large hit system-wise?
Guessing one count for each pax....That is a • load of attempted murder charges.
And each crewmember. Even with a plea deal, that has to be a lot of years in prison.Guessing one count for each pax....
And each crewmember. Even with a plea deal, that has to be a lot of years in prison.
Sad part is, the industry here has generally felt itself to be impervious to most insider attacks, as the threat was accepted to be on the other side of the cockpit door.
The knee jerk I can see: Off or online junpseater, now how do you vet them? Not just talking credentials and CASS, but their mental state? How about simply the other guy in the cockpit who you may not know? Could’ve been this guy if he was flying instead of jumpseating.
FAA may have just gotten there “see! We need more mental health evals in medicals”. And TSA may have just gotten there “see! Flight Crews can’t be trusted either!”.
Headlines? General public who is already freaked out to fly? Politician looking to make a name for themselves?Forgive me for asking as someone who isn't a Part 121 pilot, but why do we need to do anything different? Perhaps what we're doing is working pretty well.