Pressing "Start" on the timer when shooting an ILS

Honest question: Why are there separate DH & MDA knobs on many airliners (e.g. glareshield in the 737 NGs, 747-400, etc) if you should only be flying one type of approach at a time? It seems like the interface lends itself to allowing you to set both ILS and LOC mins simultaneously.

Never flown a 737 or 747, so don't know about those, but I know on the 717, DH is for CAT II/III approaches, and MDA/DA is for everything else. DH uses radio altitude and MDA/DA uses the altimeter.
 
MikeD We have all kind if heavy guys here. None seem to have any issues in thendifference in philosophy.

In military world, it is obviously trained to brief multiple approaches, and that's what the crew is expecting. I can also under stand the reason for getting the aircraft on the ground as the baddies also know where the planes land/takeoff from, as well as kniwing that's a very vulnerable time for the A/C so they are going to toss small pieces of metal at you at high velocities. You were trained to brief and fly that way. Everyone has been trained and there is a common understanding which keep the risk low.

Civillian world (even in my freight world), we don't do that. We don't train it, we don't fly that way. If one pilot chooses do deviate from what everyone else expects, it does create confusion, and raises the risk. To an unmanagable level? Probaly not, but to the point where it could be a link. Many airports I fly into, LOC and ILS approaches have different fixes, MAPs, and so forth. So it might not be such a clear cut case of changing from 200' HAT to 450 HAT.

To the decoupling of the GS signal to the LOC. I realize they are independent of one another, but as I've heard a long time ago "Deviation from the normal indicates something is wrong". That being said, I can not remember a time where the GS failure didn't mean something else was going on. Anyway, the GS is also monitored for failure by ATC

I flew both civilian and military world, and even in the cargo operations I was in prior to the military, they trained it that way. Likely it may vary between 135 operations, and it sounds like its not even allowed in 121 ops (which is fine). Just seems like it varies in the civil world whether its done or not, unless of course it's not allowed by regulation or OpsSpec.

In your case Martin, is it even an option to try? Or are you regulatorly bound to go around in any case? If that is the case, then it wouldnt matter what anyone wanted to do, if they did anything other than go missed, they'd be breaking company regs.
 
Never flown a 737 or 747, so don't know about those, but I know on the 717 DH is for CAT II/III approaches, and MDA/DA is for everything else. DH uses radio altitude and MDA/DA uses the altimeter.

Ahh duh that makes sense, thanks! I think some of them are labeled DH/MDA, and others are labeled Mins: Radio/Baro (which makes more sense, barometric vs. radio altimeter).
 
Hmm, well that's how the old company worked. But they had this weird fondness of making the FAF the highest workload possible for no reason.

No, you have to check all the radios in a paranoid panic and check the altimeter setting a SECOND time, also in a panic or YOU'RE FIRED! :D
 
Honest question: Why are there separate DH & MDA knobs on many airliners (e.g. glareshield in the 737 NGs, 747-400, etc) if you should only be flying one type of approach at a time? It seems like the interface lends itself to allowing you to set both ILS and LOC mins simultaneously.

We don't have anything like that. We have an altimeter bug that we set to the appropriate minimums (just there as a reference, and doesn't tie into the autopilot), and an altitude preselect window that works like most other aircraft. Oh, and there's also an RA bug that we set for Cat II/III approaches, but that also doesn't tie into anything.

While I think the primary concern here is the potential for CRM breakdown, a side issue is the flight mode changes (which I've mentioned previously). If you're coming down the ILS and the glideslope fails, our FMA goes from "G/S LOC" to "G/S LOC," alerting the crew that the aircraft doesn't have a valid signal. The pitch mode defaults to a basic "I don't know what to do" mode that simply maintains the attitude it was maintaining when the signal faulted. While the crew is trying to figure out what just happened, the aircraft is continuing down in a degraded pitch mode without valid guidance. If you wanted to switch to using the LOC MDA, you can select vertical speed to bring the aircraft back into a valid pitch mode, or simply turn off the flight director and fly it manually. It's not a big deal at all to do any of this, but if it's unexpected, down low and in IMC, it really is better to just take it around. I've seen guys set off sink rate warnings down low because they got behind and tried to salvage a bad approach.

Plenty of gas, not on fire, just hit the go-around switches and try again. No, you won't win any "Billy Badass" points, but nobody keeps score anyway. Most conservative wins.
 
While I think the primary concern here is the potential for CRM breakdown

Which I don't buy. If a crew can't brief anything and follow what was briefed or don't have the SA to, that's not a fault of CRM......

a side issue is the flight mode changes (which I've mentioned previously). If you're coming down the ILS and the glideslope fails, our FMA goes from "G/S LOC" to "G/S LOC," alerting the crew that the aircraft doesn't have a valid signal. The pitch mode defaults to a basic "I don't know what to do" mode that simply maintains the attitude it was maintaining when the signal faulted. While the crew is trying to figure out what just happened, the aircraft is continuing down in a degraded pitch mode without valid guidance. If you wanted to switch to using the LOC MDA, you can select vertical speed to bring the aircraft back into a valid pitch mode, or simply turn off the flight director and fly it manually. It's not a big deal at all to do any of this, but if it's unexpected, down low and in IMC, it really is better to just take it around. I've seen guys set off sink rate warnings down low because they got behind and tried to salvage a bad approach.

Which I can totally buy. Never try and salvage a bad or unstable approach, whether VMC or IMC. No need to be dorking around with anything that takes more than 2 secs or so to process. In this case, I fully agree, go around and handle the problem at altitude or climbing away.

Plenty of gas, not on fire, just hit the go-around switches and try again. No, you won't win any "Billy Badass" points, but nobody keeps score anyway. Most conservative wins.

Why you guys seem to think this is some sort of "billy badass" is beyond me. It's normal ops where I come from, nothing that takes any mad skills in any normal situation. Nothing to do with anything badass. Your idea of risk and my idea of risk are simply different.
 
Which I don't buy. If a crew can't brief anything and follow what was briefed or don't have the SA to, that's not a fault of CRM......

Fair enough, but...

Why you guys seem to think this is some sort of "billy badass" is beyond me. It's normal ops where I come from, nothing that takes any mad skills in any normal situation. Nothing to do with anything badass. Your idea of risk and my idea of risk are simply different.

I used to do this kind of stuff single-pilot in 402s, where I could get all Quickie McFasthands when I needed to without keeping other crewmembers in the loop. Like I said, it's not a big deal, and I think any competent pilot can do it. It's just a conservative culture in 121.
 
I used to do this kind of stuff single-pilot in 402s, where I could get all Quickie McFasthands when I needed to without keeping other crewmembers in the loop. Like I said, it's not a big deal, and I think any competent pilot can do it. It's just a conservative culture in 121.

Which is also fair, because I agree with you fully that with some of the automated aircraft, dorking around inputting numbers down low is completely unsafe, and a missed is indeed the best option......it's not like the 402 or the PA-31 where you just memorize a new number for MDA. Thats totally understandable. And, that even with being allowed to do it legally; with many 121 ops not being allowed to do it, and that's completely understandable too; especially if it isn't normally done. Fully understand that.
 
Which is also fair, because I agree with you fully that with some of the automated aircraft, dorking around inputting numbers down low is completely unsafe, and a missed is indeed the best option......it's not like the 402 or the PA-31 where you just memorize a new number for MDA. Thats totally understandable. And, that even with being allowed to do it legally; with many 121 ops not being allowed to do it, and that's completely understandable too; especially if it isn't normally done. Fully understand that.

Do I dare say... </thread>? :)
 
No, you have to check all the radios in a paranoid panic and check the altimeter setting a SECOND time, also in a panic or YOU'RE FIRED! :D
Per the SOP - "In a paranoid panic, do seventy things NOW and remember to start time, as you cross the FAF. Don't forget to put the flaps down, then back up, gear down, flaps down again."
I'm actually not joking about the second part either.
 
Per the SOP - "In a paranoid panic, do seventy things NOW and remember to start time, as you cross the FAF. Don't forget to put the flaps down, then back up, gear down, flaps down again."
I'm actually not joking about the second part either.

Roll inverted and pull.
 
Per the SOP - "In a paranoid panic, do seventy things NOW and remember to start time, as you cross the FAF. Don't forget to put the flaps down, then back up, gear down, flaps down again."
I'm actually not joking about the second part either.
is that due to the made up flap and gear speeds?
 
MikeD Both operations I've been at, the first was 135 commuter rules being rolled into 121, and always 2 pilots, and the present shop, which is a world-wide 121 operation that operates domestic, flag and supplemental with 2-4 pilots.

In both operations, for the last 14 years, full deflection or loss of signal was a cause for go around. Not sure if that's regulator by the CFR, policy by the 8900 or industry best-practice.
 
is that due to the made up flap and gear speeds?
Not really. I mean, you can have flaps down(approach) and then put the gear down. They just wanted flaps up at the FAF, regardless of the configuration prior. For no actual reason. Problem was, with a made up gear speed of 120, real one is 150, you need flaps to get that slow if you're bringing any energy with you down hill. So it ended up going flaps approach, flaps up, gear down, flaps down. For no reason at all but some moron that made it up to make himself feel powerful or something.
 
Not really. I mean, you can have flaps down(approach) and then put the gear down. They just wanted flaps up at the FAF, regardless of the configuration prior. For no actual reason. Problem was, with a made up gear speed of 120, real one is 150, you need flaps to get that slow if you're bringing any energy with you down hill. So it ended up going flaps approach, flaps up, gear down, flaps down. For no reason at all but some moron that made it up to make himself feel powerful or something.

120 was your gear speed at Amflight?! It's 153 in our Chieftains! So they make you use flaps to slow down to an arbitrary speed of 120?! This makes my head hurt... Why wouldn't you just make an airplane specific "speed card" where you could review the speeds for each airplane you're in? That'd be my solution as opposed to make everything conform to the lowest airplane. At Martex even, in the Caravan - and we had 50 of them or so, we were told to learn our Caravan's specifics. Mine had an upgross kit, others were 600HP vans... I don't get not flying the airplane as it's supposed to be flown.
 
In single pilot freight, you always start time on the approaches. For just the reason in this thread. GS fails, new mins are XXX, takes less brain power than moving the power levers. Heck I took a ride with a company check airman that probably would have failed me if I hadn't started time.
Wow! Did I miss something? 140 posts arguing about whether to start the timer on an ILS. I'm sure somewhere along the way someone must have pointed out, if nothing else, that a SOP of hitting the timer whether it's needed or not when crossing a FAF means less likelihood of forgetting it on those approaches where you need it.

Sort of like signalling for a turn on an empty street at 3 am. Not necessary but allows brain power to be used for more pressing things. (I actually once got into an argument with someone who said he didn't because it was stupid. When I rode with him, turned out he never signaled for turns anyway.)
 
Wow! Did I miss something? 140 posts arguing about whether to start the timer on an ILS. I'm sure somewhere along the way someone must have pointed out, if nothing else, that a SOP of hitting the timer whether it's needed or not when crossing a FAF means less likelihood of forgetting it on those approaches where you need it.

Sort of like signalling for a turn on an empty street at 3 am. Not necessary but allows brain power to be used for more pressing things. (I actually once got into an argument with someone who said he didn't because it was stupid. When I rode with him, turned out he never signaled for turns anyway.)

That's been considered, and discarded as being less important than making sure we stick to the policy of "brief only what you're actually going to do, and only do what you brief." Plenty of study has gone into this, and the airlines all stick to the same policy. I think that says something.
 
Plenty of study has gone into this, and the airlines all stick to the same policy. I think that says something.

I agree. And that can include multiple contingencies in the same brief. Which is why it's safe in military operations. So long as it's briefed and understood, whatever the plan, then its good to go in terms of everyone being on the same page; hence the reason for a brief. If anything is not understood, then something else needs to be briefed.
 
Back
Top