deadstick
Well-Known Member
If anybody ever sees one of these, fly away. Fast. Opposite direction.
If anybody ever sees one of these, fly away. Fast. Opposite direction.
That is an impressively large number of military aircraft if we are being honest.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And in terms of how much butt-patting happensI feel like military aviation is a lot like baseball in terms of acceptable weather.
If someone put wings on a taco truck I feel like this would be the result.
What's a make/model of airplane that you like/love that no one else seems to? And why?
no faith in your Iraqi brethren?
100s or 200s? Was the 200 a much better performer than the 100?Dropping in with 37 people and their golf clubs into Kapula’s 3000’ runway was great. Then leaving and doing a DME arc into Honolulu. I miss these days just not the pay!
I’ve never flown the -100, but according to the PDT folks I’ve talked to they’re dogs. The -200 had great performance imo, the -300 was better looking but performance wasn’t as good since it had a lot more weight to haul around with the same engines. The -400 handled like a dump truck but the extra 100KTAS was hard to complain about.100s or 200s? Was the 200 a much better performer than the 100?
I’ve never flown the -100, but according to the PDT folks I’ve talked to they’re dogs. The -200 had great performance imo, the -300 was better looking but performance wasn’t as good since it had a lot more weight to haul around with the same engines. The -400 handled like a dump truck but the extra 100KTAS was hard to complain about.
I’m trying to remember where C5 got their -8’s. I want to say the -200’s were former Qantas planes and the -300’s came out of Europe but I wouldn’t swear to it in court.i used to ride on America West’s -100s when mainline had them back in the day.
The original -200 sits here at TUS.
View attachment 57226
I’m trying to remember where C5 got their -8’s. I want to say the -200’s were former Qantas planes and the -300’s came out of Europe but I wouldn’t swear to it in court.
100s or 200s? Was the 200 a much better performer than the 100?
It was the 103 variant so it had a bit more power but I don't have others to compare it to. We rarely got above 16,000' and stayed the majority of the time around 8,000'I’ve never flown the -100, but according to the PDT folks I’ve talked to they’re dogs. The -200 had great performance imo, the -300 was better looking but performance wasn’t as good since it had a lot more weight to haul around with the same engines. The -400 handled like a dump truck but the extra 100KTAS was hard to complain about.
I've always thought that was such a cool plane. One of the ISR outfits, Avenge or Dynamic I can't remember, in HGR had one. Always enjoyed watching that thing coming and going.its a neat airplane. Great for what it does. Everytime I go to ELP/BIF, I see it’s older 4-engine cousins, the Dash 7, that are based there.
The ones with the PH tail numbers were Horizon when they were thinking of having the name be Pacific Horizon. C5 kept those tailnumbers.I’m trying to remember where C5 got their -8’s. I want to say the -200’s were former Qantas planes and the -300’s came out of Europe but I wouldn’t swear to it in court.