Does anyone actually believe that this type of pay structure will encourage new instructors to err on the side of caution when it comes to weather, fatigue, and student ability? That's why airlines provide a decent guaranteed base pay rather than paying a pilot $12,000 and then associating 50% of his additional pay to how far he can push himself to fly, fly, fly...
This type of pay is an incentive to succumb to "Get-there-itis". Especially at a company which pushes 4-day Commercial, 14-day CFI, etc....
Does anyone actually believe that this type of pay structure will encourage new instructors to err on the side of caution when it comes to weather, fatigue, and student ability? That's why airlines provide a decent guaranteed base pay rather than paying a pilot $12,000 and then associating 50% of his additional pay to how far he can push himself to fly, fly, fly...
This type of pay is an incentive to succumb to "Get-there-itis". Especially at a company which pushes 4-day Commercial, 14-day CFI, etc....
If it is so dangerous...why does it work fine for everyone else? I mean you bash ATP every chance you can, and in many cases cite how much better an FBO is, but now you are bashing ATP for moving pay structure to a more incentive base.
At an airline, I get a 72 hour gurantee, out of 100 hours I could fly. There are few people I know that fly guarantee only. Especially first year guys. They fly every chance they get. Flying on days off is OT. It is highly encouraged because you get 120% pay.
SpiraMirabilis said:Since when do CFIs at FBOs experience no pressure? At one point I simultaneously had over 8 career-path foreign students when I was an FBO CFI. Now that is pressure, especially when compared to the what 2 student max at ATP?
wait a minute! are you telling me the only time I learn about flying is with the engine on?Oh wait, they are a flight school.....
Guidetothesky said:I think it is actually when you turn on the master switch.