AN-2
In the words of the Russian guy who flies out of our club:
"AN-2 like tractor, can do anything with!"
Jackson hole?Bonus points: Can anyone name the airport?
I am coming close to declaring myself the winner of this category. I developed my own scoring system, and surprisingly enough, I am in the lead by a wide margin. Scoring system is as follows: One point given to displacement (in Cubic Inches), one point given for Horsepower, but these points only count if they are cubic inches AND horsepower that are in radial engine form and attached to something with a tailwheel. So far, the breakdown is this:
This leaves me with 8,339 total points (5,669 total CID, 2,670 HP). All of this with sweet sounding radials powering beautiful taildraggers. Unless someone brings something major soon, I win.
- Beechcraft A17FS - 2,350 Points (1,820 CID, 710 HP)
- Travel Air Mystery Ship - 1,375 Points (975 CID, 400 HP)
- Laird Super Solution - 1,900 Points (1,340 CID, 560 HP)
- Hughes H-1 - 2,534 Points (1,535 CID, 1,000 HP)
Pitts, maximum thrill on a budget:rawk:
![]()
It's gotta be the B200
There is not other tubroprop out there that has the long history of this airplane. I love that this is certified up to 12,500 but not over so it does not require a type.
Call me crazy. I have been around the K/A pretty much all my flying career. I worked line at Exec Beech at SUS for a couple years and fell in love with the bird.King air's are cool and all, but you don't need those engines and associated fuel burn to move that much cargo. One big round one, a bunch of Russian and some left rudder is all you need (read AN-2)
I will do you one better. The Pitts Viper. Go check out the airplane and Jason Newburg on the airshow circuit. You won't be disappointed. http://www.viperairshows.com/
![]()
Thompson Trophy winner in 1932...
Basically a R-1340 with wings and tail...
1340 CID - 800 hp (supercharged)
TOTAL - 21135...
(you should have let me know we were keeeping score)
![]()
King air's are cool and all, but you don't need those engines and associated fuel burn to move that much cargo. One big round one, a bunch of Russian and some left rudder is all you need (read AN-2)
If I had let you know we were keeping score it would have made it harder for me to win.
Waco, I think the race is tightening up! Ctab's coming on strong.
I will grant you that he is passing me. But, as much as the Gooney Bird is a great airplane, does it seriously count as "bad Ass"? I could easily throw up a Connie, a DC-4,6,and 7 and then we would be catching up. I think that the Howard/Lodestar is certainly bad ass though. I count the Gee Bee he posted and the Lodestar - but am throwing out the points for DC-3.
It is fun to both make up the rules, be the scorekeeper AND the referee all in one!
As posted earlier...
SO, although smaller, the Bellanca could carry more passengers, almost as much cargo, and do it with a smaller engine. Thus the reason it is one of the most efficient airplanes ever built. If US regulations had not outlawed single engine transports in 1934, there would have been a whole lot more of these built. It outperformed most multi engine transports during its time.