LightSquared: "Damn the torpedoes..."

I remember LS saying, "Oh, it only interferes with GPS the most between the surface and 2,000 feet" — yuh huh.

I like mountains: living on one would be great. But I don't want to admire them too closely from an airplane.
 
Seems logical. But where is the proof that GPS's listen to a wider frequency than they should. Seems like the FCC should be responsible for giving them the stamp of approval if thats the case. One thing no one has addressed yet is how is this going to effect cell phone usage overseas? Will this technology go global? How tight/strict are the requirements for things like this overseas?
The independent report about the interference. Although it involved LightSquared it also involved GPS manufacturers. Don't have a link right now on the tablet, but can get you one later.
 
Did you guys see this today?


From: http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/article...T.mc_id=ebrief

President Barack Obama will soon sign the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2012. The bill contains two hard-fought provisions for general aviation: language that helps protect the GPS system from interference by a proposed wireless network, and language that provides funding for veterans’ readjustment benefits to include flight training for veterans.
The appropriations bill, H.R. 2055, contains language introduced by Reps. Steve Austria (R-Ohio) and Kevin Yoder (R-Kan.) preventing the Federal Communications Commission from removing the conditions imposed on controversial wireless network venture LightSquared until the FCC resolves “concerns of potential widespread interference” with GPS from the ground-based components of its planned network.
The AOPA legislative affairs staff worked closely with the Coalition to Save Our GPS to ensure that the language, which did not appear in the Senate’s version of the bill, was included in the final legislation’s financial services section.
“This was a major victory for GA,” said Lorraine Howerton, AOPA vice president of legislative affairs.
Under the measure, the FCC may not lift the conditions it imposed on LightSquared on Jan. 26, 2011, or otherwise permit the company’s “commercial terrestrial operations,” until the interference issues identified by testing this year have been resolved.
For most of 2011, LightSquared has been involved in a public dispute with the GPS industry about its network’s impact on GPS after field tests showed that its ground transmitters can overwhelm the lower-powered GPS signals, posing safety concerns for aviation. LightSquared’s counter-claims against its critics and the GPS industry have provoked the ire of the congressional GA Caucus, and brought expressions of concern from GPS users in the public and private sectors.
 
2 January 2012 - LightSquared given 30-day reprieve.

JANUARY 2, 2012, 4:26 A.M. ET
Sprint Grants LightSquared 30-Day Reprieve on FCC Clearance

By GREG BENSINGER


NEW YORK -- Sprint Nextel Corp. said Sunday it gave billionaire Philip Falcone's LightSquared Inc. wireless venture a 30-day extension to a Dec. 31 deadline to get Federal Communications Commission clearance to operate its network.

Getting FCC clearance is a condition of a 15-year fourth-generation spectrum-and-equipment-sharing accord between the two companies. LightSquared has said the Sprint accord will help it save $13 billion through the end of this decade.

LightSquared has been buffeted by criticism from lawmakers, the Defense Department and device manufacturers who say the company's air
waves can jam global-positioning-system signals.

Backed by Falcone's Harbinger Capital Partners hedge fund, LightSquared hopes to roll out a fourth-generation wireless broadband network to cover 260 million Americans by 2016 and compete with Verizon Wireless, Clearwire Corp. and others in selling the service wholesale.

Last month, LightSquared pressed the FCC to rule that it had no obligation to pay for any fixes to address the GPS interference. The company, based in Reston, Va., said in the filing that GPS device manufacturers had the opportunity to retrofit their receivers to prevent any interference.

LightSquared this summer agreed to use only a portion of its airwaves and lower the power of its cell towers to help mitigate GPS interference. It has agreements with Best Buy Co., Leap Wireless International Inc. and others to provide 4G mobile broadband service after it gets FCC approval.

LightSquared officials have said the start-up has enough cash to operate until after an FCC ruling, though the company will need to find an additional $3.5 billion to be cash-flow positive over the next two years.

Officials from LightSquared and the FCC couldn't immediately be reached for comment.

Write to Greg Bensinger at greg.bensinger@dowjones.com


Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203550304577135104007572374.html#ixzz1iJdh9jlk
 
From what I know about regulation of the telecommunication industry (not a whole lot), the FCC is only responsible for granting licenses to civilian and non-federal public safety entities. Federal government agencies and the military are granted spectrum by the NTIA - the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. I can look in the FCC licensing database and find licenses for Lightsquared (or ARINC, or any state or local law enforcement agency) but I can't find any 3-letter agencies or US military/DoD related info, because that's all handled by the NTIA confidentially and not open to the public (for obvious reasons).

Basically RDoug's article says that the NTIA (military/federal) just slapped the (expletive) out of the FCC, and we have the NTIA to thank - NOT the FCC (who would have probably happily continued taking bribes from lobbyists) - for pulling the plug.

Way to go NTIA... burn the place to the ground.

But the satellite venture struggled with financing as regulatory scrutiny of the network grew. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) asked if the FCC was paying special favors to the company and asked for all correspondence between officials and the firm. Genachowski’s office refused, saying Grassley’s Judiciary Subcommittee doesn’t oversee the FCC.

Meanwhile, government aviation and military officials sounded alarms that LightSquared’s network would interfere with everything from landing gear to weather prediction systems. The FAA predicted multiple deaths could occur if the network was launched.

Still, the FCC on Tuesday defended its decision.
“LightSquared’s proposal to provide ground-based mobile service offered the potential to unleash new spectrum for mobile broadband and enhance competition,” FCC spokeswoman Tammy Sun said in a statement.

Unbelievable! If you want to "unleash new spectrum," then make it available or reallocate it from somewhere else. Don't give them the spectrum that already belongs to the GPS system and is relied on by millions (billions?) of people for their safety and the operation of worldwide infrastructure...

...you freakin idiots!!!
 
It's good news that LightSquared is being turned down, but I won't be sure the project is dead until it has a wooden stake driven thru its monkey-fighting heart
 
If LS has (had ? ;) ) a corporate jet, do you suppose it is an old Sabre with dual VOR's. ILS's and an ADF?
 
Back
Top