If you have the endorsement, you most likely also have experience flying high performance airplanes with a pressurization system, in which case that experience is more valuable that the actual endorsement. Imagine a 12,000 hour airline captain with 4 type ratings listing his complex endorsement in his resume...
Basically, my rule of thumb is that if you are a low time pilot, or someone who has little experience flying anything bigger than a C-172, then go ahead and list your endorsements on your resume. It shows you are at least acquainted with the semi-big stuff (Navajos, Barons, and those kind of planes). If you have turbine experience, those endorsements are kind of assumed. Adding them to your resume in that case, may come off as adding "filler fluff".
On the other hand, if you just just have the endorsement, but no actual experience flying a high altitude airplane, its really not going to be an advantage because the act of obtaining the high altitude endorsement requires an hour or so of ground school, and a flight or two, which you're going to get anyways during new-hire training. In other words, at the "big planes" level of the aviation career (turboprops and jets), logbook endorsements are meaningless.
That said, only a petty ####### would actually throw away a perfectly good resume if the person did happen to list his/her hp/complex/ha endorsements.