NovemberEcho
Dergs favorite member
That's like in ATC where we have the "snitch" now that automatically tells HQ in Washington if you broke sep. and I don't just mean egregious near misses, but like 2.49 miles at the threshold instead of 2.5.
In terms of unsafe, that's what I mean by I don't see anything wrong safety-wise. But there's a whole heck wrong judgement wise, due to what I cited. Even though not unsafe, it's perceptions that will kill you in the AF's eyes. As well as if any AF regs were broken, then doing something like that.....again based on the social media reasons I posted....is more bad judgement.
I can't believe 4 guys thought it was a good idea. Or maybe it's just the lead and the others forced to follow. They were really low, lower than some building downtown.In terms of unsafe, that's what I mean by I don't see anything wrong safety-wise. But there's a whole heck wrong judgement wise, due to what I cited. Even though not unsafe, it's perceptions that will kill you in the AF's eyes. As well as if any AF regs were broken, then doing something like that.....again based on the social media reasons I posted....is more bad judgement.
Agreed.
I've done plenty of stuff that's on the reservation that seeing the light of day on YouTube would result in a witch hunt after me.
Was it legal, sure.
Was it tactically relevant and therefor smart to train, absolutely.
Would it piss off the wrong person if they saw the GoPro vid, oh you get your ass.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm more interested to hear how it is going to work out for these pilots.
I have some, shall we say, personal experience with this type of event. In 2010, a formation of jets from my squadron performed what turned out to be a too-low altitude flyby of an NCAA football game.
USAF rules for flyovers say they have to be at a maximum of 300 knots and a minimum of 1000' over the stadium. As you can see from the video, these T-38s didn't quite that 1000' minimum. I believe the official investigation found they cleared the scoreboard by 58 feet, which was an overall altitude of somewhere around 200 feet. The FAA tapes showed they were doing something in the neighborhood of 400 knots when they crossed the stadium, too.
So, here's how it worked out for these pilots:
USAF leadership found that the four pilots in the formation had intentionally violated flight rules and recklessly operated their aircraft. Initially they tried to court-martial the flight leader, but he was all ready scheduled to separate from the Air Force so he negotiated an extremely stiff administrative punishment and turned in his military wings rather than face losing them in an additional court proceeding called a Flying Evaluation Board.
The three other pilots in the formation received what is essentially career-stunting (or ending) administrative punishment, as well as losing their qualifications as instructor pilots and having the AF-equivalent of a busted checkride "for cause" in their flying records.
Two pilots, who were the non-flying "safety observers" there in the stadium also received administrative punishment and lost their instructor qualifications because they neither waved-off the low pass, nor called back to report the somewhat flagrant violation to USAF leadership after it happened.
I don't know any of the particulars in the Charlotte A-10 situation, but I predict the AF will try its best to nail those pilots to the wall, even if there are innocent circumstances leading to the flyby.
Oh, but the Apaches have built in GoPros.
These guys knew what they were doing was dumb but they did it anyway.
I wouldn't be so quick to assign intent simply from a video and social media from people who get hysterical over things that are ordinary around any military base.
I wonder if we could get a new departure created over the Panthers stadium to make this legal? PANTR.HOGGG1, first fix is STADM at 500'. And then retroactively clear the A-10 guys of the incident.
WooHoo...Let's hear it for lawyers (no offense JTrain)!
True, but this is one of those situations where you are forced to take an affirmative defense. Better have a tape full of professional real legit training actions going on or some sort of "oh crap hey guys knock it off" realization to show the head office you weren't out F'ing around. Otherwise it's your word against YouTube, and that doesn't ever end well when there are undoubtedly people several levels above dealing with flack simply for the existence of this video.
I'm reminded of my time in TLH as a CFI shortly post 9/11. I kept getting the cops called on me doing engine out work south of town because "OMG low flying plane, must be TURRISTS!!" The locals' world ended one day when an Air Force 757 came by to practice VOR approaches. Never underestimate the paranoia and knee jerk reactions of the uneducated and the subsequent follow up of politicians trying to look like heros to them.
I'm reminded of my time in TLH as a CFI shortly post 9/11. I kept getting the cops called on me doing engine out work south of town because "OMG low flying plane, must be TURRISTS!!" The locals' world ended one day when an Air Force 757 came by to practice VOR approaches. Never underestimate the paranoia and knee jerk reactions of the uneducated and the subsequent follow up of politicians trying to look like heros to them.
I'm always reminded of the end of the movie "Casino", where the mob bosses are talking in the back of the courtroom.
They're talking about how so and so is "good" and "solid", 4 of the bosses are good, but the last boss says "eh? Why take a chance?".
And you know how that turns out...
Richman