Direct Entry at US majors

That place is a cesspool of anger, angst, trolling, and general offensiveness.

Oh, i thought you were referring to some posts in specific and the Lav in general, here. :)

To be fair, I’ve seen a staggering amount of disconnect from regional/ military guys lately. Actually had a Air Force type who admitted to not being able to identify any civilian airplane types. Could not tell the difference between a 737 and 320 or a 767 and 777

Was going to burn a guy at the stake who couldn't tell an MD-81 from an MD-83.

But seriously, that is kind of sorry......what did he fly? Please don't say air defense interceptors for TAC or the ANG :)

The only time I flew a jet in the US was a month ago when I delivered a 734 to the bone yard in TUS. ..

Did you deliver it to Ascent over where the retired SWA 300/500s are getting scrapped?
 
Again man... my intention is not to upset anybody or what not. This is the first step in my research. Was hoping for a few people to shed some light if they have the time to do it.

I understand how confusing it can be. I've been considering trying to move to Sweden, but it's really hard to figure out what even the basics of the airlines over there are. As far as I can tell, my licenses, ratings and experience pretty much mean nothing across the pond, and even if I was able to pay my way through the conversion process, it seems nearly impossible to find any flying job, especially in Scandinavia.

One thing you need to understand about the major US airlines is that quite a few major airline pilots have a major airline stick up their ass because they feel like they are—or have done—something special to arrive there... and they scoff that anyone would dare presume that they're qualified to work there until they're anointed and have 'paid their dues'. It's a culture of hubris combined with false humility that creates an odd miasma of "attitude."

That said, direct entry captains are a controversial issue at most airlines in the US, because it's seen as an abrogation of seniority... even in cases where no qualified FOs exist or want to upgrade.

I'm a regional rat (aka a regional lifer, which is considered a mortal insult to ones character...), and at my airline we've begun to see new hires awarded captain spots while still in training. Even at a regional, it's a disconcerting thought—flying under a guy or gal from an airline with a completely different culture, who has almost no time at your company, who you have a nearly a thousand hours more time than in the same airplane.

Further, I'd go out on a limb and say that the average regional pilot in the US has similar experience to yours... possibly more. So the reflex reaction to you not only thinking you'd be a shoe-in at a major, but thinking that you could go straight in as a captain? ... yeah, that's why.

Anyway, best of luck coming back over. ^_^ We live in interesting times, indeed.

-Fox
 
It bothers me that you’re willing to settle for that. I remember your point of view towards higher education, but even if you look at it simply as a box checking investment all logic says to get it done. You’re too smart to settle.

I think the very idea that it’s thought of as “settling” is part of what she objects to.
 
It bothers me that you’re willing to settle for that. I remember your point of view towards higher education, but even if you look at it simply as a box checking investment all logic says to get it done. You’re too smart to settle.

I don't know if I can lead you down this logical path, but to me, going to school for the sole purpose of checking a box is akin to lying. At the very least, it's being dishonest to who I am... like getting plastic surgery and giant implants to look like a teenage cheerleader. Sure, the attention would be nice, but at the end of the day, it would be for the wrong reasons.

Nah. Believe me, from a pragmatic point of view, I get it. But nah.

-Fox
 

tenor.gif
 
I don't know if I can lead you down this logical path, but to me, going to school for the sole purpose of checking a box is akin to lying. At the very least, it's being dishonest to who I am... like getting plastic surgery and giant implants to look like a teenage cheerleader. Sure, the attention would be nice, but at the end of the day, it would be for the wrong reasons.

Nah. Believe me, from a pragmatic point of view, I get it. But nah.

-Fox

Sorry, but that’s one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever heard.
 
I think the very idea that it’s thought of as “settling” is part of what she objects to.

But it absolutely is. It’s not about flying big jets or respect or anything like that. It’s limiting yourself to a place where the name on the plane doesn’t match the paycheck, therefore risking your job security.

I understand how one can get “stuck” there. There is no shame in that. But knocking out a degree would require very little effort and the rewards would be worth it.
 
I don't know if I can lead you down this logical path, but to me, going to school for the sole purpose of checking a box is akin to lying. At the very least, it's being dishonest to who I am... like getting plastic surgery and giant implants to look like a teenage cheerleader. Sure, the attention would be nice, but at the end of the day, it would be for the wrong reasons.

Nah. Believe me, from a pragmatic point of view, I get it. But nah.

-Fox

Only cheerleaders get to fox the quarterback...
 
But it absolutely is. It’s not about flying big jets or respect or anything like that. It’s limiting yourself to a place where the name on the plane doesn’t match the paycheck, therefore risking your job security.

I understand how one can get “stuck” there. There is no shame in that. But knocking out a degree would require very little effort and the rewards would be worth it.

I get it, and I personally agree with you. But I also understand how someone can feel the opposite, and I don’t fault them for it. Some people just refuse to play the stupid game. In a way, I admire it, even if it’s not as pragmatic as I am by nature.
 
Only cheerleaders get to fox the quarterback...
Who I fox or do not fox is my own business. ^_^

But not every fox wants the quarterback.

To carry your metaphor on, though, maybe some of us want someone who's less... twisted steel and sex appeal and more ... someone to cuddle with on the couch and watch movies, go on multi-day hikes through the woods, sing with in the shower...

Granted, what we seem to have is a semi-abusive relationship with a conservative, tsundere pauper who sometimes becomes abusive but we love anyway because he's all we can get...

BUT STILL...

-Fox
 
Who I fox or do not fox is my own business. ^_^

But not every fox wants the quarterback.

To carry your metaphor on, though, maybe some of us want someone who's less... twisted steel and sex appeal and more ... someone to cuddle with on the couch and watch movies, go on multi-day hikes through the woods, sing with in the shower...

Granted, what we seem to have is a semi-abusive relationship with a conservative, tsundere pauper who sometimes becomes abusive but we love anyway because he's all we can get...

BUT STILL...

-Fox

This is something of the point. The fake-titted cheerleader is willing to fake it to achieve their goal, and likely succeed. Your goal may be significantly more complex, but if you aren't willing to take a small but necessary step to get there, then the abusive pauper of a regional is the lot you deserve.

Greed is good!
 
This is something of the point. The fake-titted cheerleader is willing to fake it to achieve their goal, and likely succeed. Your goal may be significantly more complex, but if you aren't willing to take a small but necessary step to get there, then the abusive pauper of a regional is the lot you deserve.

Greed is good!

I cannot fake it without compromising who I am, and I will not do that.

I am willing to accept the consequences of that.

I appreciate the concern, and let me be clear—I don't hold anyone else's decisions against them. I don't resent our exemplar cheerleader unless s/he decides that her success is based on merit alone.

Secondarily, I do not embrace "Greed is good." That is an attitude I will always fight to change.

"They won't be coming for money. Not the best of them. They'll be coming for Damascus , which I'm going to give them."

-Fox
 
@B737FLY

I can't believe what I'm reading.

I moved right after flight school, since I was able to jump straight into a 737 FO position with a young and fast developing carrier.

So you were a ab-initio type 250-300 hr wonder into a 737.

My experience is 4000ish hours on 737 300 through 800 (all EFIS). PIC for the last 2 years, flying for 6 years.

Flying a total of 6 years, 2 yrs as CA, which means maybe 2-3 yrs as a FO tops. And only 4k total hours? 2 ys as CA means you've probably flown ~1500 hrs PIC and the rest 2000ish as a FO?


Now this is what really floors me:

One of the things I hated most about being an FO was flying with non standard and below average captains. Old guard non CRM types. The best thing about upgrading was never having to deal with those types and making efforts to never become one of those types. I like the responsibility of command, I like helping FOs develop and grow (to the extent of my experience). I love managing the flight my way and take great pleasure in arriving early, saving fuel and giving the passengers a comfortable ride. Worked my ass off to upgrade... why would I ever want to accept a right seat again?

Dissect this one at a time. One, your complaint isn't about one or two CAs. It sounds like a whole bunch. So either all CAs at your airline are a problem, or you are the problem. Below average CAs? By what standard? And since you only spent at most 2 to 3 yrs as a 737 FO in an airline environment, just what do you really think you know at that stage in the game to decide weak CAs?

"Managing the flight my way" and "why would I ever want to accept a right seat again"


I have news for you: you are "that" guy. Whether you know that or not, you are "that" guy. "That" guy is the CA who thinks he knows best, knows it all, and tries to model his FOs on what he thinks is best. Many times he muddles the line between technique and SOP, and piss off FOs in the process. You are most likely overbearing, on the no fly list of FOs, and your comment of "why would I ever want to accept a right seat again" reeks of entitlement, arrogance, and does NOT sound like a good, sound CA who tries to model FOs.


I have a story from my airline, and my gut feeling is this story kinda applies to you.

A couple years ago, I flew with a CA and during introductions he mentioned he had worked at Atlas for 6 yrs and it was the best flying job he ever had. He asked me my background, and I told him it was regional flying and that it was ok - lots of flying multiple legs and long duty days. He nodded and then said (again) that he used to be at Atlas and he misses the job. So having heard this twice now, I had to ask the obvious: if you liked it and it was a good flying job, then why leave to come here? His answer was that he had been a FO all 6 yrs, and that there was no upgrade coming up for him, and that many CAs there were weak, not following SOPs as in doing things differently / their own way, and he couldn't take that kinda environment as FO. So he left and came to my current company, where he upgraded very quickly because of rapid expansion at the time. So no harm, no foul, right?

Wrong.

He lets me take the first leg to Orlando on the transcon. I'm flying, but very quickly I see he has his own very particular quirks and obviously does things his own particular way. Which is ok, he is CA after all. But then a few things stand out. So as an example, we have weather up ahead, I'm looking at it. Without saying a word he keys up the mike and asks for 20 right (which, ok, he can as CA). But then he also pulls the heading bug and turns the plane 20 right. On my leg. Now I find that kinda weird. That's just one example. On every single thing he just does it. And his way. Some not really exactly matching SOP. Some things he has as a technique, he's convinced is SOP (it wasn't) and wants me to do it that way. Again, as long as it's safe, but I'll still point out politely. Anyway, there is no input, no discussion. If I suggest something, no lets do it [that other way]. His CRM was interesting to say the least.

So on the leg back from Orlando the next day, I kinda chuckled inside because I knew right then that at Atlas, his CAs weren't the ones who were weak, or lacked skills, or couldn't make decisions.... No. They were the ones who had to put up with this overbearing, dominant FO who literally ran his own show. And when he saw he couldn't get his way, had no chance of an upgrade, he left at the first chance of an airline with a rapid upgrade time so he could be CA. And I bet you if someone asked him today about moving to a FO seat on another/larger plane, his response would be "why would I ever want to accept a right seat again." My conclusion after flying with him was that without a doubt, he was basically what is referred to in aviation as "Captain right seat" while at Atlas. This is the FO who is overbearing, makes decisions without input/informing the CA, throws the book at the CA for [whatever issue], and basically runs the show from the right seat. Then when they upgrade, they become a real left seat CA and their habits are the same.


Based on what you've written, your words, your attitude, you fit that description.
 
Back
Top