ScareBusA320
New Member
MDPilot said:I just love it when college students know so much more about the realities of this industry than we do, don't you Doug?![]()
Hey but at least I'm not Chris Ford right???
MDPilot said:I just love it when college students know so much more about the realities of this industry than we do, don't you Doug?![]()
ScareBusA320 said:Hey but at least I'm not Chris Ford right???
MDPilot said:I just love it when college students know so much more about the realities of this industry than we do, don't you Doug?![]()
ScareBusA320 said:Hey but at least I'm not Chris Ford right???
Chris_Ford said:Sorry we all can't be starry eyed like you. Find one post where I've said I'd work for low (insulting) pay? My only pet peeve is when people say the words "can't live on" coupled with "only" and then finally "$75,000 a year" when 60+% of American families "manage" to do it. Sorry, I'm just a lowly CFI and I am able to barely live on (note: not comfortably, which would be a modifier to use if you were going to say the "I can't live on" phrase) approximately $16k a year (without mommy and daddy's help, unlike most other college kids). Seeing people making 5 times as much money complaining about living wages is akin to hearing baseball players say that an average salary of $700k is not enough. However, this does not mean I don't understand where they're coming from. I realize that kids will suck up money and it's fairly easy to get acclimated to living off of $100k and then a sudden paycut might force a sale of a house (which is bound to leave a bitter taste in one's mouth) and/or "roughing it" but sometimes people act as if they're the first person to have to take a paycut. It's unfortunate, yes, and I don't wish it on anyone at all, and I think it's a horrible thing that it's the state of the industry, but it's also happening in other industries (IT specifically, with outsourcing being a major problem).
This might shock and surprise those who think they know how I think and reason, but I think the only real solution for this is action by the pilots. A weak union does nobody no good, the union needs to fight tooth and nail for every inch, and rather than threatening to strike, it'd be nice to see a group stand up to management. Now, understand this... I'm talking from the perspective of an outsider. I stand in a position where I will not lose my job or starve, and I'll be the first to acknowledge that I don't know how the airline side of the industry works, and that by asking these questions that I ask, and stating my opinions, I'm able to grasp better at what the true causes of the strife between mgmt and pilots is all about.
So I'm terribly sorry that I don't rub you the right way. Maybe once I become a "legacy" pilot, you'll come up and ask me questions about my super big B737 while I'm trying to enjoy some Burger King during my first sit-down meal of the week. And I appreciate you interjecting me into a conversation in which I have not posted and really didn't care to be a part of.
ScareBusA320 said:Irregardless the term "legacy" carrier is still a valid industry term.
![]()
Doug Taylor said:A couple of things, you've got to drop the 'legacy' word because it doesn't mean jack.
MDPilot said:I just love it when college students know so much more about the realities of this industry than we do, don't you Doug?![]()
Purdue_Pilot said:I admit to knowing very little about aviation compared to a seasoned pilot.
but my point is simple...young cfi's who don't have the baggage necessary to inhibit them from taking a "lower than some pilot's respect" salary WILL continue to sign the contracts. Therefore, yelling at young cfi's to stop taking the jobs WILL NOT work. So, a new solution to the airline problem IS necessary...
Chris_Ford said:I think the problem lies in the veil of secrecy that surrounds the aviation profession. Honestly, I think if ALPA ran ads (like the ATCers did last year) on CNN and Airport CNN, it might be informative to the public, finding out that their pilot is not being paid $250k a year, and that some airlines hire low experience individuals to save costs.

Chris_Ford said:I think the problem lies in the veil of secrecy that surrounds the aviation profession. Honestly, I think if ALPA ran ads (like the ATCers did last year) on CNN and Airport CNN, it might be informative to the public, finding out that their pilot is not being paid $250k a year, and that some airlines hire low experience individuals to save costs.
KLB said:Hey! It almost happened at the university I attended. There was going to be an instructor strike until the head of the department started threatening to sabotage the leaders of the strike who were undergrads....and that pretty much shut all strike rumors down. And instructors there are still working under strict strict strict conditions for dirt cheap to my knowledge.
Maximillian_Jenius said:Hey Chris...your the Chief Flight Instructor at Purdue. Perhaps you and the other CFI's can pull a "code red" on Purdue pilot so that he can get his priorities in order!
Chris_Ford said:And Pengy, by lowering minimums, they're able to open the pool up to those willing to work for less, no?
Chris_Ford said:I'm the Chief Flight Instructor at Purdue? Cool! Where's my $70k salary?![]()
ok, so you've presented a non ending problem.. what is YOUR solution?Purdue_Pilot said:I admit to knowing very little about aviation compared to a seasoned pilot.
but my point is simple...young cfi's who don't have the baggage necessary to inhibit them from taking a "lower than some pilot's respect" salary WILL continue to sign the contracts. Therefore, yelling at young cfi's to stop taking the jobs WILL NOT work. So, a new solution to the airline problem IS necessary...