bimmerphile
MCAS Meat Inhibition Logic
ALPA does not hire or fire pilots. In this scenario, please expound with your insider knowledge how the association kept this person employed
That's what pilots unions are for. defending pilots. all the time.ALPA needs to be stop defending these pilots all the time.
That's what pilots unions are for. defending pilots. all the time.
Someone was going to pull the short straw no matter what. Ill never work for Kirby again, I know that.Nobody was more surprised than those of us who worked there. Especially me! I was darn sure we were finished in July 2020 but surprise!
That's what pilots unions are for. defending pilots. all the time.
They also ping the FO for not using his CPAP in a few places.
On the subject of pilots washing out, I unintentionally ran across this case report from a pilot's unsuccessful wrongful termination/discrimination suit against PSA that's a good read. It's public record so names aren't redacted - some may know folks identified here.
Occhione v. PSA Airlines, Inc., Case No. 3:11-cv-05 | Casetext Search + Citator
That's what pilots unions are for. defending pilots. all the time.
That's what pilots unions are for. defending pilots. all the time.
I was about 20 numbers junior to him and then flew with him few times between his first and second attempt at upgrade. The first guy who failed him did my upgrade, and the second (and last) guy to fail him did most of my upgrade OE. There is a ton of stuff that was left out of the summary judgment document, but non of it helped the FO's case.
This must be 121 logic…..………,.Some airlines have a two strike rule for CA upgrade. After your second failure at upgrade, your 3rd will be the last. So they become career FOs. “Hey, you’re too weak and incompetent to be a CA. So go be a weak FO the rest of your career.”
………..
This must be 121 logic…..
The word "ANY" is incorrect. Or is at least incorrect for individuals who truly understand the top end of the corporate aviation world.Still would rather 121 than ANY 135 or 91.
Nope, a labor union, is not a clique or coffee klatch that decides who they will or will not represent, It is obligated to represent all of the rank and file vs management in the context of an employer/employee agreement.Nope.
An pilot union is there to defend the contract. If a company follows the rules in the contract in a discipline process, the union won't do a thing to protect the pilot.
The problem is that companies often screw up during the discipline process, and a union is forced to fight for the job of a bad (skills or personality) pilot.
Don't start none, won't be none.There's a whole thread for this pursefight.
Moved on to bigger and betterShe still flying for them?
The word "ANY" is incorrect. Or is at least incorrect for individuals who truly understand the top end of the corporate aviation world.
Lack of understanding on full display again.
Moved on to bigger and better
My comment was solely in response to CC, not in reference to this lawsuit, but the purpose of labor unions in general. I have flown with Claude, but I have no comment on about him, management, or how his union acted in this case.You know, I'm guilty of thinking that too, but if you look at the lawsuit I posted a link to on the preceding page, as well as this nearly identical one, both pilots accusing the carrier of racial/ethnic discrimination had ALPA reps sit in on their final upgrade checkrides. And in both cases, the ALPA rep agreed with the examiner's failure of the upgrade candidate.
Rajabi v. PSA Airlines, Inc., Case No. 3:11-cv-271 | Casetext Search + Citator
Read Rajabi v. PSA Airlines, Inc., Case No. 3:11-cv-271, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal databasecasetext.com
I'm not a pro pilot, let alone a union represented one, just posting legal facts available to myself and other Joe Publics.
But if I ever interview with PSA, I'll be sure to mention that I've been around enough to know not to make someone's ethnicity a conversation piece. I mean seriously.